Jump to content

100 Most Damaging Wikileaks Emails of Hillary


Hagar

Recommended Posts

This is the most disturbing thing I've seen.  Most of you know I'm conservative, and thus have an extreme dislike, and distrust of Hillary.  I now find that my opinion of her, though very low, was way to high.  Some of these, such as #23, is downright despicable.  And these emails not only show Hillary for what she is, but the collusion with other areas of our Govt does nothing but add distrust to that institution.

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, REBgp said:

This is the most disturbing thing I've seen.  Most of you know I'm conservative, and thus have an extreme dislike, and distrust of Hillary.  I now find that my opinion of her, though very low, was way to high.  Some of these, such as #23, is downright despicable.  And these emails not only show Hillary for what she is, but the collusion with other areas of our Govt does nothing but add distrust to that institution.

This is the hidden content, please

The president said that Hillary has been through enough and that he would not prosecute her! What a piece of work!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, six burg said:

The president said that Hillary has been through enough and that he would not prosecute her! What a piece of work!

Probably gor him a bunch of fence riding votes. Oh those politicians.

I hope I get to see Hillary in bracelets. She will probably threaten and curse the officers the whole time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, six burg said:

The president said that Hillary has been through enough and that he would not prosecute her! What a piece of work!

Not Trumps finest hour.  Based on the evidence in these emails, she and several of her staff need a cigarette and blindfolds, and placed against a wall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, REBgp said:

Not Trumps finest hour.  Based on the evidence in these emails, she and several of her staff need a cigarette and blindfolds, and placed against a wall.

I agree but blindfold only. Cigarettes are bad for you and may cause lung cancer. Kinda like making sure the needle is sterile before inserting it into the vein of an inmate about to be executed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LumRaiderFan said:

LOL...so Trump is the piece of work for saying he will let her off, not Hillary for the emails?

If she is guilty of a crime she shouldn't be let off. Somebody in trumps admin. is guilty of a crime right now. We just don't know which ones yet. jeff sessions has lied to the feds, Michael Flynn is hiding something. Paul ryan is just one crooked bast...d.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, six burg said:

If she is guilty of a crime she shouldn't be let off. Somebody in trumps admin. is guilty of a crime right now. We just don't know which ones yet. jeff sessions has lied to the feds, Michael Flynn is hiding something. Paul ryan is just one crooked bast...d.

Do you have evidence? (Oops, what a silly question.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Reagan said:

Uh -- no she wasn't!  Comey said she was guilty as sin.  That's when he broke FBI rules and made a decision that was left up to the Attorney General.

You beat me to it.

Liberals always seem to conveniently forget that part. Or perhaps they just don't understand it. I'm leaning towards the latter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, six burg said:

Hillary has been investigated and found innocent, so what evidence do you have.

My response was not about Hillary. And your statement is absolutely false. My question referred to your accusations of Trump's administration. It is a very simple question, but somehow you don't seem capable of an answer...thus my "Ooops, what a silly question" caveat. And to no one's surprise, it was spot on.

56 minutes ago, six burg said:

do you? (Oops, stupid arse question)

And this one explicitly illustrates how childish you are. You made a few accusations, I asked you to back up your accusations, and you respond with this quote that even a 1st grader would be embarrassed in making. Just because you try to jab then run doesn't mean we are not all laughing at you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, six burg said:

If she is guilty of a crime she shouldn't be let off. Somebody in trumps admin. is guilty of a crime right now. We just don't know which ones yet. jeff sessions has lied to the feds, Michael Flynn is hiding something. Paul ryan is just one crooked bast...d.

LOL...Trump just HAS to be guilty...we just don't have any proof yet.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

LOL...Trump just HAS to be guilty...we just don't have any proof yet.

 

Yep, I asked him for proof of his accusations, he avoided the question then ran as fast as he could. Seems to be a pattern (which he laughably tries to deny). I'm sure we will get the proverbial "I have a life" or "I don't have time for this" excuse sometime in the near future. What's puzzling is how someone can get embarrassed so many times but continue to exhibit the same embarrassing behavior over and over. I don't know if it's lack of self-awareness or lack of self-worth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, six burg said:

Hillary has been investigated and found innocent, so what evidence do you have.

You want to know how innocent she is, you read those 100 emails and come back on here and tell me how innocent she is.  Matter of fact, if you read them, you'll see just how corrupt many in the Democratic Party are.  No doubt, some Repubs aren't much better, we just don't have evidence comparable to this exposure by Wikileaks.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 6/6/2017 at 10:09 PM, REBgp said:

You want to know how innocent she is, you read those 100 emails and come back on here and tell me how innocent she is.  Matter of fact, if you read them, you'll see just how corrupt many in the Democratic Party are.  No doubt, some Repubs aren't much better, we just don't have evidence comparable to this exposure by Wikileaks.  

When the cops have killed folks, you say let the court decide the outcome. You say don't riot, respect the courts outcome. With Hillary you say she is guilty no matter what the courts are investigating says. With the cops you say, wait on the evidence, yet you accuse the Clintons of murdering folks ,with no evidence . Don't want to accuse the cops with no evidence. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,977
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined


  • Posts

    • No offense, but both sides do it.  The Rs in Texas want to do away with decades of precedent and demand that Dems are no longer given chair positions on any committees in the Tx House. It sounds reasonable enough, until you arrive at a point when the Ds enjoy a single seat majority in the house, select the most leftist speaker of all times, and the refuse to give Rs any say in the legislative process by refusing to give them any committee chairs.     Experience has shown me that any time a party seeks to consolidate power in a legislative body, it backfires.    What I don’t like is a world where we cheer for Manchin for doing his own thing, but also re-elect guys like Paxton and Patrick when they make threats to R Legislators if they don’t do exactly what the Radical Right demands. Our Rep here in Hardin County lost his spot for voting against private school vouchers-his wife is a teacher. He also voted his conscience on the Paxton impeachment.  It cost him his seat…. Not because of the will of the voters in his district, but because if millions of outside dollars pumped into the race from outside the district and even an endorsement of his unknown challenger by Donald Trump himself.    Why do people like you applaud Manchin for being his own man and then vote against Phelan for doing the same thing?
    • We'll see. I don't trust us. 
    • Starting pitching has been shaky the last few weeks due to some injuries outside of Hagen Smith.  He goes tomorrow, so y’all should be fine 
    • Manchin may get it but any mention of the radical left that wanted to get rid of the filibuster and end almost 220 years of history because the Democrats are mad?  The House and Senate are obviously different legislative bodies with entirely different election processes and rules for a reason. The House can vote on laws with a simple majority vote. The Senate put rules in place that it would make it much tougher to pass laws. Laws should be difficult to pass. The Senate is often the holdup of the right and left. It takes 60 votes to break the filibuster so any law will almost certainly require agreement at least in part, from opposing sides of an issue. Because they can’t get laws passed, the radical left is like a baby having a tantrum and wants to change over 200 years of history and make it potentially ridiculously easy to pass laws. I have seen current poll maps and it is possible for the Republicans to sweep into complete power in November but by the tiniest margin. That would possibly mean that a single vote margin in both houses could enact what you might call the radical right laws. There would be nothing that the Democrats could do to stop any legislation whatsoever if the left (they are all radical, minus Manchin) got their filibuster rule changed.  That is where the current filibuster comes into play as any new law would require several Democrats to agree with the majority Republicans and vice versa.  Do you want the potential for your radical right to have free rein as the radical left wants by killing the filibuster or is the radical left just as (if not more) dangerous? Let’s see if we have a history in this area? Oh yeah, the Democrats changed the rules in the Senate to allow federal judges to not have to overcome the filibuster. Obama was not getting his federal judge nominations passed and being angry, they changed the rules instead of nominating more moderate justices. They were warned that it would come back to bite them. They didn’t care and chose the nuclear option to change the rules. Oops! Any guess how Trump got all of his Supreme Court nominees passed against strong Democrat opposition? The Democrats got rid of the filibuster for federal judges after another tantrum   So when you are so worried about the radical right, are you equally concerned in what the radical left is always doing by changing rules and history which were put into place just for situations like we are in? So while Manchin gets it, what about his other 50 colleagues (49 + Harris)?  What concerns you more, Abbott and Paxton or the Democrats who want to make it to where if the Republicans do take over, they can go wild… at least in your mind? 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...