Jump to content

West Brook's Flanigan reinstated


AggiesAreWe

Recommended Posts

43 minutes ago, Tigers2010 said:

and(B) with intent to arouse or gratify the sexual desire of any person;

(ii) arouse or gratify the sexual desire of any person;  or

Look, the people who investigated the action know the law better than we do. They can interpret the law better than we can. They concluded no law was broken. Ya'll can post all the links to the penal code you want. They looked at it and found no law violate. So what is the point of posting a link to a law that was not broken?

You can "break the law" and not be relieved of your duties. It's not cut and dry.

There was an issue, it was investigated, and the outcome has been determined. As a person with no dog in this hunt, I am happy with the outcome.

I am willing to bet that there will not be any cameras in the locker-rooms. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Bandwagon Ranger said:

You can "break the law" and not be relieved of your duties. It's not cut and dry.

There was an issue, it was investigated, and the outcome has been determined. As a person with no dog in this hunt, I am happy with the outcome.

I am willing to bet that there will not be any cameras in the locker-rooms. 

Yes you can, but that isn't the case here. It was determined he didn't break the law.

And I am with you, I am glad he was not terminated, and I doubt the camera he put up is still there. For one, he caught the thief so there is no point, and two, I am sure he doesn't want to deal with this again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/11/2017 at 7:46 PM, BMTSoulja1 said:

Casual observation.  Most of the people th ata glad that he's reinstated is only because they want little Johnny to keep his starting spot and not have to compete for it next year.... At least that's word around town.  

Maybe that's the case for some. I, on the other hand have heard nothing but good things about the Coach from not only a coaching perspective but a character perception as well. It may be only my opinion, but I believe Beaumont ISD is lucky to have a guy like that at the helm of it's largest ISD concerning all things athletics. Perhaps, there are many who are unappreciative. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,949
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • I don't completely disagree. Individual drills, running, lifting, etc. I agree are perfectly fine. This incident involved a padded practice where a kid was injured. I just think it would be best for an AD to have the Varsity athletes currently participating in another sport just sit out. It's an activity with a much higher risk of injury. We don't see basketball kids practicing/playing while football season is going on do we? No, because no AD would allow that. Let's have the same common courtesy for the other sports too.
    • Too many people haven’t heard “Dirty Old Egg Sucking Dog” by Johnnie Cash.  Way too many flakey people in this world. Was she fighting dogs to death across state lines? Lots of the people who would condemn Noem  had absolutely no problem with Vick. I guess politics is a whole nother animal. 
    • I have some friends whose “fur baby” bit somebody in the face because “she wasn’t feeling good and he was “in her face.”” The young man needed three stitches on his chin. She still growls and snaps at people all of the time… she’s a cocker spaniel with a bad attitude and she bites.    Those same friends are expediting their first actual skin baby this summer… they’re not worried at all, and I’m certain that they’ll be shocked when the dog maims their baby.     God gave us dominion over the animals for instances like this. 
    • No argument in your rationale however politics isn’t rational. Said people vote. Those votes don’t have to be approved by a jury deciding if a voter has a valid reason for his beliefs. There are things that I firmly believe but I would never say them, even in private (what is private anymore?) if I ever intended to run for office. It doesn’t matter if my private thoughts could be proven 100% as correct, it still might very likely lose voters and an election.  Maybe you missed the Trump presidency……  
    • Well at least she didn't eat the dog. Then again, she might have become president.   I can't believe this went to page 2 without anyone mentioning Obama eating dog meat.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...