Jump to content

Beaumont Central 35 Lumberton 34/FINAL


WOSgrad

Recommended Posts

Jags are down this year but are very much in the playoff hunt. Livingston and NED and Jags will probably battle it out for 4th. This will probably be the first time in the Foreman Era that the jags finish worse than 3rd. However Central is 18-7 in district games in that time span. I guess coaching could be the problem but if the jags make the playoffs it will the first any head coach has ever gotten central to the playoffs four total times, much less four consecutive times. Face it Central, you don't have much in your history when it comes to tradition and consistancy. Be careful what you wish for cuz you may get it. Just my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hindsight is always 20-20. If we get the 2pt, everyone is happy. When you don't get it, all the arm-chair qb parents question the decision. I always say, instead of questioning the call, go watch the film and see which players didn't execute the play correctly. If the players block who they are supposed to block, we win the game. You don't help prepare these kids for life when you don't teach kids to take ownership for their mistakes and shortcomings. We still love them and they are still great kids, bus let's not cripple them for life by teaching them to blame others when they fail.  And oh by the way, if we don't lose the turnover battle, we win. Coaches don't fumble. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, AthleticSupporter - Jock said:

Hindsight is always 20-20. If we get the 2pt, everyone is happy. When you don't get it, all the arm-chair qb parents question the decision. I always say, instead of questioning the call, go watch the film and see which players didn't execute the play correctly. If the players block who they are supposed to block, we win the game. You don't help prepare these kids for life when you don't teach kids to take ownership for their mistakes and shortcomings. We still love them and they are still great kids, bus let's not cripple them for life by teaching them to blame others when they fail.  And oh by the way, if we don't lose the turnover battle, we win. Coaches don't fumble. 

All around great post.

Every play is designed to score a touchdown, and it always comes down to missed blocks or blown assignments.

And yes fumbles hurt!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Sure.  You reassign an employee and they leave voluntarily instead of being fired and being open to litigation.  The outcome is the same, but you are making my point.  The superintendent and AD and principal are all empowered to make personnel decisions.  Instead of accepting the decision made, you talk about lawyering up, no one else was reprimanded, railroad job.  I am old enough to remember when high school sports taught life lessons...accountability being chief among them.
    • I know absolutely nothing about the situation, but I do know head coaches of sports other than the AD have actual teaching assignments, and I know from my wife having worked in the sped department of multiple schools that it’s not uncommon at all for coaches to shirk those duties.  It could very well be that this was the case at BC.  Or not, I don’t know.  Just bringing this up to point out the fact that, although many coaches only want to worry about coaching, they generally have several other responsibilities at the school.  some of them neglect or ignore these duties entirely.  If he’s been written up for other issues before, it’s a dumb argument to say “he was punished for this and others were not”.  If he had a pile of write ups in his file and they did not then it makes sense that the punishments were different.  
    • He wasn’t fired, he was reassigned and people get reassigned all the time. If he was actually fired, then you would have a point, but he wasn’t fired. Based on the information presented here no way this would stand if they fired him and he lawyered up. 
    • I heard the assistant was going to get this job and assume it was referring to the old Vidor coach, Nate Smith.  I always thought he did more with less at Vidor and can't help but think he shares some responsibility in Vidor's recent success. 
    • Classic Bridge City.  Always someone else's fault, refs/umpires cheated, AD with an agenda, yada, yada, yada.  As far as I can tell it's damn near impossible to get fired at these schools so when someone does get fired, it's usually something.  Drama at Bridge City is a constant.  The guy did a good job coaching basketball and I'm sure he'll continue that somewhere else.  Time to move on.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...