Jump to content

Muenster 50 Dallardsville Big Sandy 43/Final


Recommended Posts

Just now, oldschool2 said:

Probably not used to playing games this close.

all those 4a playoff teams they beat this year was close games for the most part. even the two losses were close until the end. La marqque game wast lost in the 4th quarter.

Big Sandy will pull away here in the 2nd half. Muenster has ALOT of size. See: Rosebud Lott 2001

But Angel, Benson and Dickens will be too much for Muenster's monsters. LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MOSSHILL said:

all those 4a playoff teams they beat this year was close games for the most part. even the two losses were close until the end. La marqque game wast lost in the 4th quarter.

Big Sandy will pull away here in the 2nd half. Muenster has ALOT of size. See: Rosebud Lott 2001

But Angel, Benson and Dickens will be too much for Muenster's monsters. LOL

No they don't. Muenster has the one '6"6 kid. The rest are same size as Big Sandy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, AggiesAreWe said:

No they don't. Muenster has the one '6"6 kid. The rest are same size as Big Sandy.

Mike,

They are getting beat in the paint and their size is a definite advantage in this game.

I don't know what game you are watching but you need to put your glasses on. I'm watching the game Mike,

I don't think u want to argue basketball with me, jack.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, MOSSHILL said:

all those 4a playoff teams they beat this year was close games for the most part. even the two losses were close until the end. La marqque game wast lost in the 4th quarter.

Big Sandy will pull away here in the 2nd half. Muenster has ALOT of size. See: Rosebud Lott 2001

But Angel, Benson and Dickens will be too much for Muenster's monsters. LOL

That was a long time ago relative to a basketball season.  They've been involved in a lot of blowouts since then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MOSSHILL said:

Mike,

They are getting beat in the paint and their size is a definite advantage in this game.

I don't know what game you are watching but you need to put your glasses on. I'm watching the game Mike,

I don't think u want to argue basketball with me, jack.

 

I am sitting 6 feet right behind the Muenster bench courtside. I see very clearly how big Muenster is.

I'll argue all day with you about basketball, JACK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Sure.  You reassign an employee and they leave voluntarily instead of being fired and being open to litigation.  The outcome is the same, but you are making my point.  The superintendent and AD and principal are all empowered to make personnel decisions.  Instead of accepting the decision made, you talk about lawyering up, no one else was reprimanded, railroad job.  I am old enough to remember when high school sports taught life lessons...accountability being chief among them.
    • I know absolutely nothing about the situation, but I do know head coaches of sports other than the AD have actual teaching assignments, and I know from my wife having worked in the sped department of multiple schools that it’s not uncommon at all for coaches to shirk those duties.  It could very well be that this was the case at BC.  Or not, I don’t know.  Just bringing this up to point out the fact that, although many coaches only want to worry about coaching, they generally have several other responsibilities at the school.  some of them neglect or ignore these duties entirely.  If he’s been written up for other issues before, it’s a dumb argument to say “he was punished for this and others were not”.  If he had a pile of write ups in his file and they did not then it makes sense that the punishments were different.  
    • He wasn’t fired, he was reassigned and people get reassigned all the time. If he was actually fired, then you would have a point, but he wasn’t fired. Based on the information presented here no way this would stand if they fired him and he lawyered up. 
    • I heard the assistant was going to get this job and assume it was referring to the old Vidor coach, Nate Smith.  I always thought he did more with less at Vidor and can't help but think he shares some responsibility in Vidor's recent success. 
    • Classic Bridge City.  Always someone else's fault, refs/umpires cheated, AD with an agenda, yada, yada, yada.  As far as I can tell it's damn near impossible to get fired at these schools so when someone does get fired, it's usually something.  Drama at Bridge City is a constant.  The guy did a good job coaching basketball and I'm sure he'll continue that somewhere else.  Time to move on.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...