Jump to content

NHSBulldogFan

Members
  • Posts

    2,001
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by NHSBulldogFan

  1. 23 minutes ago, KF89 said:

    NHS409 is speaking facts. Whoever takes the Nederland job has to rebuild the program from the ground up, that will take a few years to get back to competing for district titles & making decent playoff runs.

    The district Ned gets put in will be a factor also

    I don't think we're that far off we have several 3 year starters back for 2024 just need consistency...my question with the impressive names applying are can Nederland close the deal we've been here before will this time be different 

  2. 2 hours ago, Separation Scientist said:

    And I clearly stated "SETX or even Houston coaches" in my post.  Did you purposely ignore that to try make a point?

    Now you and Stepp both have made inaccurate statements about me. What is the problem? These misquotes need to stop.    

      

    On 1/4/2024 at 8:52 PM, Separation Scientist said:

    Shocker. 

    The post is about DFW and SETX not Houston 

  3. 3 hours ago, Reagan said:

    OK, opinion time:  During the above mentioned time frame, at Nederland, even Neuman couldn't bring a team to the big dance.  Why do you suppose that is?!  

    Two of those years (1999, and 2000) we played the best team in the state and still to this day two of the best defenses I've seen in Texas City (1999) and Bay City 2000 both those teams were big physical fast and well coached...the 2001 team was not near as talented but played with a ton of heart and once again ran into a team that was more physical than us (Smithson Valley) looking back on it now our best shot at state was really the 1998 team but we fell apart in the 2nd half vs. Bay City that year...fact is Larry Neumann changed the mentality of Nederland when he came in 1993 that mentality has now reverted back to the Pre-Neumann era and I don't see things getting better anytime soon with the current system in place 

     

  4. 50 minutes ago, PN-G bamatex said:

    We keep having this debate over talent versus coaching. I personally think the right coaching is the most important factor in the success of any program, but I also think we shouldn't ignore the interplay between the two. As I stated in another thread, the best coaches find a way to get the most out of their kids, whether they've got a ton of talent or none. To be clear, I'm not just referring to motivation, or discipline, or execution, or community support and program culture, or adapting a system and a playbook around the personnel. I'm also referring to player development.

    A strong strength and conditioning regimen is an important part of any successful football program. Some programs are much better at developing their talent than others. If we're being honest, that's Nick Saban's secret sauce. When Saban brought in Scott Cochran to revolutionize the Alabama weight room shortly after Saban arrived in Tuscaloosa, Alabama became a championship contender in two seasons. Kirby Smart lured Cochran to Georgia to do the same thing plus coach special teams, and then Georgia won back-to-back national championships in Cochran's second and third seasons in Athens. Many Alabama fans, myself included, felt Cochran's absence in Tuscaloosa was the missing factor during the last few seasons when we seemed to lose some of our intensity. Coach Joseph will be the first person to tell you PN-G's success under his tenure started in the Indians' weight room during spring training.

    My point is, good coaching will develop talent to realize its full athletic potential. Granted, that relies upon some stock level of talent at the start of the process. Without that development, however, the potential is never reached, and that is almost entirely a factor of coaching.

    There is no comparison between PN-G and Nederland when it comes to strength and conditioning...one of these is not like the other😄

  5. 7 hours ago, Reagan said:

    So, Nederland has the same type athlete available.  One can't be so silly to think otherwise.  Like, what, there's a wall between the two cities and the good kids can only stay on one side?  It's easy to complain.  So, what has been Nederland's problem over these years and what is the answers?  And on the other hand, during these years, why has PNG been so successful?  

    I've got alot of thoughts on this

    There's not a drastic difference at QB, RB, or WR between the two schools IMO here's where the difference is...

    PN-Gs offensive line this past year was the biggest I have ever seen at PN-G they are big and they can MOVE there is no comparison when you compare the offensive line of PN-G to Nederland PN-Gs offensive line can move mountains Nederland's offensive line could get blown over by a small win

    PN-G-both offensive and defensive coordinators as well as the offensive line coach won state BEFORE arriving at PN-G

    Nederland-not a single coach had ever won state 

    PN-G is making the run that it is because of coaching the greater emphasis on defense and technique and the size of the offensive line all of those things Nederland has none of.

    I also don't think it's a facility issue nor is it a community support issue

    I'll close with this when Brandon Faircloth left PN-G the schoolboard made a decision we're going to go out and get the best coaches we can and it has paid off in spades...Nederland schoolboard doesn't care about being the best instead the priority is on what your last name is and if you're a good ol' boy or not...it's actually reached the point of complacency and contentment with 4 win seasons or less which after Larry Neumann had coached us I thought we would never get back to but here we are

     

  6. 39 minutes ago, pine curtain said:

    does anybody have the game stats?

    FULL GAME SOC Port N

    FIRST DOWNS 11 19

    Rushing 8 7

    Passing 3 9

    Penalty 0 3

    NET YARDS RUSHING 108 102

    Rushing Attempts 29 32

    Average Per Rush 3.7 3.2

    Rushing Touchdowns 2 1

    Yards Gained Rushing 152 120

    Yards Lost Rushing 44 18

    NET YARDS PASSING 54 179

    Completions-Attempts-Int 5-12-0 14-24-0

    Average Per Attempt 4.5 7.5

    Average Per Completion 10.8 12.8

    Passing Touchdowns 0 0

    TOTAL OFFENSE YARDS 162 281

    Total offense plays 41 56

    Average Gain Per Play 4.0 5.0

    Fumbles: Number-Lost 3-1 0-0

    Penalties: Number-Yards 7-65 4-20

    PUNTS-YARDS 2-109 2-49

    Average Yards Per Punt 54.5 24.5

    Net Yards Per Punt 54.5 24.5

    Inside 20 0 1

    50+ Yards 2 0

    Touchbacks 0 0

    Faircatch 0 0

    KICKOFF-YARDS 4-211 5-198

    Average Yards Per Kickoff 52.8 39.6

    Net Yards Per Kickoff 36.2 23.2

    Touchbacks 1 0

    Fair Catch Yards 24 0

    Punt returns: Number-Yards-TD 0-0-0 0-0-0

    Average Per Return 0.0 0.0

    Kickoffreturns: Number-Yds-TD 5-82-0 2-17-0

    Average Per Return 16.4 8.5

    Interceptions: Number-Yds-TD 0-0-0 0-0-0

    Fumble Returns: Number-Yds-TD 0-0-0 0-0-0

    Miscellaneous Yards 0 0

    Possession Time 18:58 29:02

    1st Quarter 02:59 09:01

    2ndQuarter 07:06 04:54

    3rdQuarter 05:43 06:17

    4thQuarter 03:10 08:50

    Third-Down Conversions 2-9 2-10

    Fourth-Down Conversions 2-3 3-3

    Red-Zone Scores-Chances 2-2 5-6

    Touchdowns 1-2 1-6

    Field goals 1-2 4-6

    Sacks By: Number-Yards 2-5 4-22

    PAT Kicks 2-2 0-0

    2Pts Conversions 0-0 1-1

    Field Goals 1-1 4-4

    Points off Turnover 0 3

×
×
  • Create New...