89Falcon

Another brilliant analogy: multiple complaints = multiple to the ER. Keep them coming.

Was it several girls at Caldwell (like WV)? Also, whether the turf is hotter or the same is irrelevant. Enjoy your irrelevant analogies. Can’t wait to see what you come up with next.

What would the biggest question mark be for Silsbee? I know they don’t have a void like they faced last year with Miller leaving.

What is everyone thinking about the upcoming football season? WOS seems to be a solid pick to finally get back to a District Championship. Silsbee is hard to count out. Will HF reload? Will Jasper rebound after taking a drop back in 2024? Can Shepherd pick off one of the top 4? Does Tarkington have a chance to be competitive?

Left out "burning hot track". Coach causes many (not one) kids to seek medical treatment and excuses because the wounds will "eventually heal". Compares to cheerleading. Astonishing degree of incomprehension.

Incredible logic: you can "injure kids and as long as the injuries eventually heal", everything is fine.

He is available to the industry.

If several of them seek medical treatment due to multiple degree burns on their hands it might indicate “negligence”. Most folks do not expect a group of kids to head to the ER after PE due to the day’s activity. I am fully aware that you have no concept of negligence even though another poster listed the legal definition.

Where do you come up with this stuff? Do you understand what negligence and omission mean? In this case the kids were presented with do something that was supposedly fun from TikTok or something not fun. That is pressure. Allegedly, the coach also pressured them verbally after some were wanting to stop. This has nothing to do with me. Why are law enforcement and the DA investigating? With no potential for an offense? BTW, you struggle with making up stuff on all of these threads.

Mr Falcon has done nothing more than address your questions. The question was asked previously was “what could he potentially be charged with”. The answer was “child endangerment”. You are somehow stuck on the fact that the incident is “unintentional”, intention is not required for child endangerment to be applied. There is a criminal investigation going and is not being conducted by “Mr Falcon” but instead by law enforcement and the DA. He may or may not face charges but myself and many others will not be surprised if he does.

Because the "opt out" would include a "workout". Choices were 1. "Do the challenge" or 2. "Do a workout". The obvious inference is that to avoid the "workout" you have to "do the challenge". That is "applying pressure". Afterwards, many kids sought medical treatment. *** For reference: 6th graders are not routinely capable of rendering adult judgement as to what is in their best interest. The point that the "challenge was optional" is utterly irrelevant. The kids were under the care and influence of an adult caregiver.

Exactly.

So, they were pressured to do the challenge. That will make it worse.

1. Were the victims children? 2. Were they under the supervision of the coach? 3. Were they injured? 4. Was the activity introduced by the coach?

Texas 22.041

We will soon find out. What will make the situation criminal is the statute and the DAs reconciliation of the facts with the statute. We do know for certain that the coach came up with the drill and then instructed the kids and the kids went to the ER. Whether that fits the statute remains to be determined. I am nearly 100% certain that the parents will be scoring a considerable law suit.

Got it, so this is a unique situation. Doesn’t look good for the coach. Pretty low hanging fruit for lawsuits as well.

You saw incidents from a single 6th grade workout where several kids went to the ER? That is common?

Also, there are not many incidents where a single drill sends many 6th graders to the medical facility.

I have not said he is a criminal. It appears he has an issue based upon the statute. There is nothing in the statute about “years of experience” or “where your mentor is”. We will soon know what the DA thinks.

In reading the statute the coach appears to have some exposure. There is a clause regarding athletic activities that can release liability but it appears the coach mishandled that part as well, particularly since he initiated the drill. I think I read somewhere that another coach advised to not do the activity.

“Negligence” and “omission” are also qualifiers. The big factor is that the coach instructed kids. Whether or not the 6th graders had an option to participate in the drill is irrelevant. The coach is in the position of authority and the kids are 6th graders. As a result of the drill that the Coach led there were multiple kids injured and had to seek medical treatment.

Who instructed the kids to do the activity? That will be key to the charges. Placing the child in a place of danger knowingly, through negligence or omission would qualify. I don’t have direct details and don’t want to try the case here. Will have to let the officials determine the facts.

“Child Endangerment” would be one potential charge.

Never want to be in the news. Especially with injuries to young kids. Going to be difficult to recover professionally (at least in education).