Jump to content

89Falcon

Members
  • Posts

    1,493
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Everything posted by 89Falcon

  1. I anticipate they will unless the new HC can work some serious magic.
  2. Hardin does return a lot. They probably have the best player in the district at RB/LB. I dont believe Anahuac looks good with the loss of Barrier. I dont know what replacement options Anahuac may have but the kid they put in when Barrier was hurt does not look the part.
  3. Hardin will give them a challenge.
  4. Agree 100%. Lot going on this week for many families. Also, sometimes kids just need a mental break.
  5. It appears that Silsbee and Shepherd have the most returning starters in the district.
  6. Would like to hear from the HF folks. HF seems to have lost the most starters to graduation of all the teams in the district.
  7. Another brilliant analogy: multiple complaints = multiple to the ER. Keep them coming.
  8. Was it several girls at Caldwell (like WV)? Also, whether the turf is hotter or the same is irrelevant. Enjoy your irrelevant analogies. Can’t wait to see what you come up with next.
  9. What would the biggest question mark be for Silsbee? I know they don’t have a void like they faced last year with Miller leaving.
  10. What is everyone thinking about the upcoming football season? WOS seems to be a solid pick to finally get back to a District Championship. Silsbee is hard to count out. Will HF reload? Will Jasper rebound after taking a drop back in 2024? Can Shepherd pick off one of the top 4? Does Tarkington have a chance to be competitive?
  11. Left out "burning hot track". Coach causes many (not one) kids to seek medical treatment and excuses because the wounds will "eventually heal". Compares to cheerleading. Astonishing degree of incomprehension.
  12. Incredible logic: you can "injure kids and as long as the injuries eventually heal", everything is fine.
  13. He is available to the industry.
  14. If several of them seek medical treatment due to multiple degree burns on their hands it might indicate “negligence”. Most folks do not expect a group of kids to head to the ER after PE due to the day’s activity. I am fully aware that you have no concept of negligence even though another poster listed the legal definition.
  15. Where do you come up with this stuff? Do you understand what negligence and omission mean? In this case the kids were presented with do something that was supposedly fun from TikTok or something not fun. That is pressure. Allegedly, the coach also pressured them verbally after some were wanting to stop. This has nothing to do with me. Why are law enforcement and the DA investigating? With no potential for an offense? BTW, you struggle with making up stuff on all of these threads.
  16. Mr Falcon has done nothing more than address your questions. The question was asked previously was “what could he potentially be charged with”. The answer was “child endangerment”. You are somehow stuck on the fact that the incident is “unintentional”, intention is not required for child endangerment to be applied. There is a criminal investigation going and is not being conducted by “Mr Falcon” but instead by law enforcement and the DA. He may or may not face charges but myself and many others will not be surprised if he does.
  17. Because the "opt out" would include a "workout". Choices were 1. "Do the challenge" or 2. "Do a workout". The obvious inference is that to avoid the "workout" you have to "do the challenge". That is "applying pressure". Afterwards, many kids sought medical treatment. *** For reference: 6th graders are not routinely capable of rendering adult judgement as to what is in their best interest. The point that the "challenge was optional" is utterly irrelevant. The kids were under the care and influence of an adult caregiver.
  18. So, they were pressured to do the challenge. That will make it worse.
  19. 1. Were the victims children? 2. Were they under the supervision of the coach? 3. Were they injured? 4. Was the activity introduced by the coach?
  20. We will soon find out. What will make the situation criminal is the statute and the DAs reconciliation of the facts with the statute. We do know for certain that the coach came up with the drill and then instructed the kids and the kids went to the ER. Whether that fits the statute remains to be determined. I am nearly 100% certain that the parents will be scoring a considerable law suit.
  21. Got it, so this is a unique situation. Doesn’t look good for the coach. Pretty low hanging fruit for lawsuits as well.
  22. You saw incidents from a single 6th grade workout where several kids went to the ER? That is common?
×
×
  • Create New...