UT alum

Yeah, there’s no difference between a Wendy’s and the country’s seat of government. A bunch of parrots in here. Either that, or Trump’s one heck of a ventriloquist.

Speaker Mike Johnson wants to blur the faces of January 6th insurrectionists so that they can’t be further identified and charged with any criminal acts. Soeaker Johnson is also an election denier. If Antifa, BLM and Capitol police conspired with the FBI to either stage or instigate the invasion of our Capitol, wouldn’t it make sense to not blur but magnify the faces so that the “truth” would be known? The real actors caught? Darned conspiracies!

You know, for a guy so hung up on sources, every one of the “lies” was disputed by the “reporter” without citing a single source verifying it. Legit news sources don’t ask for donations on their websites (including FOX). Zero credibility.

[Hidden Content] I think 100% of scientists thought the earth was flat 500 YEARS AGO. Since knowledge is now doubling approximately annually [Hidden Content] your comment about the flat earth scientists from half a millennium ago was hopefully made in jest.

That’s pretty sanctimonious.

Thank you for your honesty.

Mighty lot of words. Boy, you must feel smart. I’ve never claimed that the earth is geologically unstable. I have made no absolute comments. If you aren’t aware of fires, floods, droughts, record deluges and never before recorded high temperatures, not to mention the thinning of the Arctic ice sheet and the thawing accelerating at the South Pole, I can’t help that. [Hidden Content] Even if 80% of climate scientists agree, that’s enough to convince me. I still believe in science: physics, math, chemistry, stuff like that that we depend on to advance.

I’m not confused.

Don’t see anything illegal. Rather see that than a bunch of skinheads chanting “Jews will not replace us”. Both are forms of free speech. Which group you prefer?

Did you leave the top half of those uniforms out on purpose? Looks a lot like Nazi colors and goose step. I think the Right has left its mind.

You got any credentials to be drawing such absolute conclusions, or is it all based on knowledge accumulated from gateway pundit?

The climate swings predicted by the warming models are happening. Unprecedented records both ways. “It’s hot today. Must be global warming. Now it’s cold, must be an ice age coming”. Idiotic thinking.

Ever hear of a guy named Pinochet? Argentina’s not a good analogy.

Dr. Demento and his Mini-me.

Where’s the relevance? Only Clinton’s administration didn’t pile debt like crazy since WWII. Trump’s was the champ in debt creation. Just because the ratio to GDP got outside the lines during Biden’s term is basically irrelevant.

I never thought I’d see a substantial group of Americans back Russia over democracy. What’s your point?

I take it you didn’t watch. At least we don’t believe and embrace dangerous lies.

Watch “An Uncomfortable Truth” if you have Amazon Prime. I would like to read your reaction.

I mean, terrorism hits fast and hard, racism slowly grinds away. They are equally damaging to a CIVIL SOCIETY, democratic or not.

What’s the difference?

Did you pass American history?

Nobody’s scared of a second rate two bit criminal. That kind of a morally bankrupt individual should not be leading or anywhere near any leadership position in the greatest democracy on earth. Go ahead and give the stock reply, trumpers. NO ONE NEEDS IMMUNITY IF NOTHING WRONG HAS BEEN DONE OR WITNESSED. Can that just not penetrate your mind?

I don’t know that it’s been reported he’s explicitly flipped, but why would he need immunity if he wasn’t going to talk about things done with the defendant’s knowledge or consent if it was all legal? That’s a pretty strong indicator that he’s cooperating with the prosecution. I have no idea what evidence Meadows has, but a couple of other witnesses have said he was closely involved in the activities described in the indictments filed in both investigations.

Meadows was offered immunity for testimony in documents case and January 6 case. Are you saying that is fake reporting? Meadows was held in contempt of Congress for ignoring a supbpoena to testify in the second impeachment trial. Are you saying that is a lie? If there was nothing to turn on, why would he, or any other witness but especially he - the closest person to him on a day to day basis by job description - need immunity? That’s not fake news. That’s what they call logic. I’m not relying on anyone else’s opinion. I’m taking facts recorded in the public record and drawing my own conclusions. You oughtta try it. It’s a lot more productive than listening to someone else tell me whatvthey think about it. I can think for myself. At the end of the day, I’ll be proved either right or wrong.