UT alum

The Weasel has accomplished his task with you. Liberal = un-American. I made my claim based on the way you interpret law enforcement authority. You make your assumption based solely on my affiliation. That’s the kind of the kind of thinking authoritarians want their subjects to have.

I’m thanking you now. Keep me grounded, Boyz.

Back that garbage up, Dog, if you want to debate.

There is no national emergency. States have rights. That used to be a bedrock of the Republican Party. Federalizing local law enforcement is called martial law. If that’s what you want without emergency, you’re un-American.

Trump is a liar. Talk about ostriches!

Yes. He is a lapdog to a liar. Why trust anything he says?

But is it true?

Yes. Use the traditional Republican response. “Local control until we don’t like it”. Federalize it! The small government party goes large.

Yeah, boy. Let’s federalize all local law enforcement. Put the Guard to writing traffic tickets and responding to domestic violence calls. Head ‘em up, move’em out. Whomever Dear Leader says to pick up.

I dispute the numbers. Trump is a lying liar. He only uses numbers HE likes. To hades with accuracy.

Who know?

I am interested in your thoughts on Trump using import taxes for non-economic reasons

I’ve been there a dozen or so times over the last 25 years and never felt unsafe anytime anywhere. And I go off the beaten track when I travel. To call in the national guard is a stunt to make Trump either feel or look like a strongman. Again, I pity the fool.

Trump is a lying liar. He’ll have his little dictatorship now. I pity the fool who believes anything that man says.

Yeah, my guess is that the import tax monies will go to debt service just like lottery money went to fund public education in Texas. Not.

Infusing cash before having an idea of how tariffs affect demand could be risky. Lowering rates to help finance an import tax is injecting money that will have zero productivity value. Again, don’t see how taxing U S citizens to further international political agendas will end well. India because we want to two them where to buy oil, Brazil because Trump doesn’t like the way they’re treating Bolsonaro. That is not an economic plan.

You are one bloviating dude. Aggies said let the voters decide. I said that would take a constitutional amendment. The Constitution says either the Legislature or a 5 member board do it. You get it, now?

I’m talking emigration, not this blog.

What do you think civil disobedience is?

Maybe it’s the data collection system. Can you think in a non political way about anything pertaining to the federal government and its internal workings?

She released the 818,000 downward revision in August, 2024 in the heat of a presidential election, numb****. That hurt her own party badly. Not a partisan move. If you did your own research you’d know that BLS numbers are revised mainly due to slow or delayed reporting by employers. It is not a matter of politics. It’s the NUMBers.

And I will say Trump had no problem jumping all over the 818,000 downward revision the same person (McEntarfer, appointed by Biden) released in August, 2024 - in the heat of a presidential election battle. It did not help the Democrats position so the Weasel ate it up. His posts on his Truth Social network roasted the dems over that report. Go on defending the indefensible.

Can you cite those “Texas rules”, please?

We can respectfully agree to disagree, I hope. Redistricting is not a bill. It is a separate function of the legislature. We’d have to have a state constitutional amendment to change how it’s done. [Hidden Content]

The Weasel in an interview today with CNBC: ”I got the highest vote total in the history of Texas, as you probably know. And we are entitled to five more seats.” Entitled? Really? Republican- the party of entitlement. Who’s driving our Texas legislature?