5GallonBucket
-
Posts
6,551 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
21
Posts posted by 5GallonBucket
-
-
27 minutes ago, bullets13 said:
If the republican voter base insists on backing a candidate that has a very good chance of losing when they could've nominated just about anyone else and cakewalked to victory, it might be time for the right to stop with the "uninformed voter" schtick. "We're not stupid for nominating a guy most people hate, they're just stupid for not voting for him anyway" is a dumb argument that I hear far too often.
who says they would’ve cake walked to victory…some poll🙄, some media pundits🙄 come on now
Trump has already proven himself 16-20(and against everyone, media, gop, dems ) This is why he wins the conservative vote. Pretty simple. And most believe that there was cheating taking place in 2020. So that plays in their decision as well.Not that there isn’t any uniformed gop voters cause there is.
What have the dems proved
open borders
boys can be girls and girls can be boys
MAPs🤦♂️
defunding the police
sanctuary cities
homeless take over
free drugs and needles
baby murders
porno books for kids
could keep going but what’s the use
fence riders are upset oh well What moderates and fringe dems wantf is for conservatives to sacrifice principles and most I know have dug in.
if dems win again then maybe we have a bigger deeper issue then trump
-
Good gracious that’s embarrassing And hard to watch
-
1 hour ago, tvc184 said:
I do find it rather ludicrous that the Texas GOP has to ask whether they should enact laws such as relieving property tax, securing the border, etc.
Same.
-
3 hours ago, Boyz N Da Hood said:
DeSantis would've been a lock for 2024, hell I possibly would've voted for him
policies wouldn’t be any different under him. So now you have answered in which I assumed
it like battered woman syndrome
3 hours ago, Boyz N Da Hood said:You expect me to answer for others? Okayyy
Look at the last election, mid terms etc.... keep gambling
I did see that I put “people” so fair enough but givin the state of the country and even more so since midterms do you think the country still vote the same way only because it’s TRUMP. To me I look at that as a voter problem.
-
14 hours ago, tvc184 said:
They are not important because they are meaningless. They are discussion points… as if the Republican legislators don’t know what is popular.
2 and 6 are almost certainly unconstitutional.
8 is likely unconstitutional in parts.
13 is probably unconstitutional
though I agree in bold
So are you saying “don’t vote” on these
I agree with most of the props “meaningless” or not, but it’s a way for my voice to be heard even if they chose not to take action upon the votes on such props.
Either way I’m going to vote on officials and while I’m there I’m voting on such props.
-
12 hours ago, Boyz N Da Hood said:
I'm just calling it how I see it...
so no answer to the question
should I assume that it’s “orange man bad” no matter how good the policies are…..
therefore whose to blame🤔
too many softies in this country who vote based on feelings.
maybe our country needs another beat down. We need more hard times for the majority of Americans to wake up. If people still voting based on feelings then this country will get what’s coming and you can still blame the conservatives if it makes ya FEEL better
-
28 minutes ago, Boyz N Da Hood said:
Another epic beat down coming with only yourselves to blame!
So no blame goes to the uniformed voter who votes for what we have now.
🤔
is it the policies or the man behind the policies that people take issue with?
-
-
I lean covey
-
-
This reminds me. Vote. Prop 13
-
56 minutes ago, bullets13 said:
Was Shenk any good? I teach his daughter. We talk from time to time, and I never knew he was a basketball guy.
Fast and Shifty quick and could get up. He made his impact on defense. Stole the ball a lot in full court press and in half court trap.
his best sport was football. RB. He only played his senior year.
-
14 minutes ago, Unknown Fan said:
I spoke to Coach Kenebrew before the interview, he said by looking at the UiL brackets HF has never in the playoffs 1st as far as the records show. If they were Co-Camps, they must have lost the flip or seeding game. This year is the 1st year that they are out right champs and are going in as the 1st seed. In '99 HF went into the playoff as the 2 seed. And got beat by Kirbyville in the 1st round.
the above is true but
Your article never used the phrase “out right champs”your article is based on 1st district championship in HF History which is false
from the article
“One team here in Southeast Texas is not only doing that, but has made history on the court in the process; Hamshire-Fannett High School boys' basketball earned their first district title in program history.”
-
-
3 minutes ago, Bobcat1 said:
Maybe they meant outright champs?
Did u read the article?
"They came out, and they played," head coach for Hamshire-Fannett boys' hoops Adrien Kenebrew said. "We started going back through the UIL archives for their brackets and we didn't see Hamshire-Fannett winning anything. They went in second, third, and fourth place a couple of times, but they did not win district. That's when we got the idea of saying hey we're going to be the first team in history to bring a district championship back to Hamshire-Fannett.
-
And their reasoning for coming up with this is a lil surprising. Even if a team goes in as the 2 seed doesn’t mean they didn’t share the district title. Coaches should know this.
sorry to bust your bubble.
-
-
You can thank lbj and Ted Kennedy for the infiltration into USA
-
“I support the murder of babies”
“I support sex changes so individuals can take advantage”
“I support others teaching my kids sex acts”
”I support changing the truth”
”I support lazy people”
“I support taking $ from those that worked for it”
“I support racism”
etc
etc
etc
ohhhhhh I also quote scripture
🤣😂🤣😂🤣🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️
-
6 hours ago, Bobcat1 said:
Playing devil's advocate here - Cita' had nothing to gain or lose in this game - Still going into the playoffs as the #1 seed.
Flip side - WB can use that momentum and make some noise in the playoffs!
I hope so but they ll more likely see shadow creek 2nd round. They re really good
-
2 hours ago, Cu Chulainn said:
It seems Evadale would've made more sense. EC is pretty far for both teams.
That’s what I was hoping for. I ll just keep up with updates from the comfort of home
-
-
This is disturbing. They are better than previous years but this not winning on the road is pathetic especially to a team you handled very easily from start to finish the 1st time.
where is the mental preparation? They have no business losing to IW
i don’t know the specifics to the game but several players must ve not played due to injury or illness.
Something’s gotta change in the road prep pre game schedulecome tourney time your not playing at home.
-
Of course this is my opinion but I see the right for lethal force. attacking officers
We re talking about migrants who come from unstable countries where law and order is uncommon. I ve lived in one of these countries….i ve seen it first hand.
stop with the soft approach
Trump Running in 2024
in Political Forum
Posted
When would it end then….
Exactly right. Some stand others waver
in the end no one wins appeasing to such horrid policies of the left.
it amazes me that ya ll want to blame conservatives for voting for a better America but don’t want to blame liberals for for voting in liberals that weaken America.
kool aide anyone