Englebert

Blah, blah, blah...you got nothing. It really is pathetic and embarrassing for you. You can't back up anything you say. When I refute your claims, which are lifted straight from Left wing sites, your only response is I parrot Conservative blogs. That is just childish. You are a textbook Liberal (which is not a compliment, in fact, is paramount to the ultimate derogatory comment) and you can't see it. Would you like to have a go at saving what little dignity you have left and try to refute any part of my response? I'll play your little gutter snipe game as long as you can back up your contentions. So far you can't. Let's start with the first one. You said the Republicans have no plan. Here's an article from that bastion of wing-nut Liberal ideology Politifact from 2013 in which they agree Republicans have over 20 health care proposals: [Hidden Content] And also: [Hidden Content] Since 2013 many others have been proposed: [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content] Shall I continue. These links are from just the first page of a Bing search. Now don't you feel silly. Would you like to move to Point 2 or should you just concede you are just a sheeple for the wing-nut Liberal Party formerly known as the Democrat Party.

They added a rider of replace to the repeal bill. That's the difference and that's why it failed, and thankfully so. They need to just repeal the thing.

1. Republicans have multiple plans, just not one consensus plan that the members will go along to get along. Can't say that about the other party who voted on a bill they didn't even read, or even had a chance to read. The fact that Democrats voted on a bill they didn't read has to be one of the most embarrassing acts in the history of the United States. 2. Yes the RINOs are spouting they have to replace at the same time as repeal so that the 11 million on Obamacare can keep relying on the taxpayer to foot their bill. What they don't realize is that repeal of Obamacare does not kick off or prevent anyone from obtaining health insurance, but instead shifts the burden of payment back to each individual. 3. Agreed 4. You know nothing about White people. (I had to throw that in for giggles.) You've had every chance to backup your assertion of massive protests at the town hall meetings, more chances than you have given Trump before pinning the liar moniker. So is it time you admit you are a liar? 5. - 9. You are spouting a whole lot of nothing. 10. Those tea party politicians are not worried about how upset snowflakes will get about the repeal of Obamacare. Those wing-nut Liberals that are crying wouldn't vote for a Republican anyway. You might want to pull you head out of your safe space and expand your horizons on sources of information, because if you think any Republican will upset their base by repealing Obamacare, then you might be just too brainwashed by the Liberal media for any hope. If Republicans replace Obamacare with another monstrosity of a governmental ran entitlement fiasco, then they will upset many, many of their voters. That is what they are worried about, and rightly so.

Trump has done more positive things in his first few months than Obama did in 8 years. And who is being ugly? Do you have a clue? After all, you think protecting Americans is somehow a racist act towards Muslims. So your judgment of "ugly" is not to be trusted.

The RINOs are the ones that want to replace Obamacare. The truer Republicans are the ones that want to repeal Obamacare only. Repeal of Obamacare could happen tomorrow except for the RINOs who are adamant about replacing Obamacare at the same time as repeal. I think Rand Paul's plan would pass in short order without the obstruction of those pushing Ryancare.

Mass demonstrations....of what? When any of the demonstrators are asked why they are out here, they get that blank, scared, stupid look on their face (the ones that dare show their face) and just say something on the verge of retardation (if they say anything at all) like "uh, uh, uh, Fox lies". How about you step up and explain to us what these demonstrations are about. We sure can't find out by questioning the ones out there. And you keep claiming of mass demonstrations of town halls, but still can't provide a link. Didn't you accuse Trump of lying because he didn't back up a statement? Now that a congressman has backed up his statement, questions have emerged on his truthfulness, not so much on yours. Ratings at an all time low...this coming from the same polls that said Hillary would win in a landslide, the Democrats would take back the Senate and probably take back the House. How did those polls work out for you? And you can't go on and on. This is all you got...which is nothing. And at least you got the ending qualifier describing your post correct. You could have ended with "embarrassing", which would have been more appropriate.

From the New York Times: [Hidden Content] Do you think Clinton had any persuasive influence over anyone making the decision? Frankly, I don't know. But it is sure highly coincidental that the cash flowed into the Clinton Foundation from the Russians during this oversight decision. I would also like to know if any of the other department heads received "charitable" contributions during this time, either from the Russians or from the Clinton Foundation.

A few things this "study" failed to mention: Who are all of the world class doctors emanating from these countries? What are all of the new breakthrough miracle drugs and medicines coming from this list? What are the new and innovative medical devices being rolled out? How much money do these countries spend on R&D? Do you think the cost per person for medical care and healthcare would rise if those countries spent that R&D money? Do you think the best and brightest from these countries go into medicine if they know the government will control their earnings forcing them to live on an average working wage, or do they come to America to get their education and open their practices here to pursue the American dream?

So you are saying the Democrats need to treat Trump with kid gloves. We've went from the most coddled president in history to the most mistreated, which is very obvious to anyone that is not confined in a safe space eating up the Liberal news like comfort food.

Just some more of your fake outrage? I understand perfectly what I'm writing, but I have no clue as to what you are writing.

Trump brought it out of the Liberals by playing their own childish games. The Liberals are on full display showing their hate. The peacock feathers are in full plumage, and man is it a sight to see.

The quote means to "give the ability to each to help themselves". If you just help them, you will have to help them for the rest of your life, and creates a dependent society. You don't give a damn about it because you don't understand it.

Baddog's quote went way over your head...even though it is as straightforward as you can get.

Keep trying to profile me. It's reveals you acceptance of one-way bigotry. And I love O'Reilly and Hannity. Disagree with them some, agree some, but have stopped short of hanging their posters above my bed. Can we same the same about you?

Not for everything. And I definitely don't trust the Southern Poverty Law Center. They are a hate group themselves. So if the KKK is so big and powerful, why did they allow Affirmative Action laws to be passed. Why do they allow trillions of dollars to be spent on minority outreach programs. Why do the allow Black and Jewish politicians to be elected. Sounds to me like they don't wield as much power as you believe.

We all know which party corners the market on hate. You don't like Trump supporters because a few of them are copying the Liberal tactics of intimidation.

I asked you to give your personal opinions of the subject. I knew you didn't want to debate this issue. You will run and hide as usual.

I don't know. If it hasn't, why do you harp on the subject so much? Do you really think I am suppose to feel guilty because some people I've never met, are not kin to, and have no association with committed an egregious act around a hundred years ago...an act that has been duplicated by other people also. Are you trying to use what happened nearly a hundred years ago as an example of what is going on today? This just shows you have nothing, and revealing of your true hatred. It is readily apparent to everyone except you.

Let's talk about the government's favors for drug companies. Please spell them out. I'm anxious to hear you well thought out take on the situation. I bet you won't dare give your personal opinion. The most we can hope for is you will post some link from the Huffington Post or some other Liberal rag.

That statement just epitomizes your lack of understanding.

Do you think its time? After all, it's been around a hundred years since we burnt one down. Can't say that about all people though can we.

You have stated on many occasions that Congress is inept, in it for themselves and don't care about the people. Since you hold this stance, why do you continually advocate for bigger and bigger government? Do you think if the government gets big enough and has enough power, they will somehow magically convert to good up-standing people?

I would put my judgment up against any one on that list. What about you? Do you think you would make a better Congressman than anyone on that list, including Nunes?

Maybe the Republicans can recruit a couple of Harry Reids, Nancy Pelosis, Joe Bidens, Chuck Schumers, Diane Feinsteins, Al Frankens, Shelia Jackson Lees,...oh my, this list is just so sad, and just the tip of the iceberg in ineptness.

How hard would it be for the government to pass a law on this one subject? They could have it done by tomorrow. Why do we need a whole monstrosity of a doomed government program just for this one issue?