Englebert

Everything you said helps the working class. His Cabinet is comprised of successful businessmen who know how the business world operates, versus academia who have never ventured out of their safe space at public institutions...institutions that rely on government funding and are not beholden to the consumer. He did not try to strip health insurance from millions of people...that is an absolute lie. Name one person who is not allowed to have health insurance under his plan. He has stated publically on many occasions he will not cut Social Security...another absolute lie. And you have the nerve to say that Trump lies.

Here you go Bluedove. I didn't read all of the article, it was way, way too long. But here is a list on some of the things Trump has done since inauguration. Compare this to what Obama did in his first two months. [Hidden Content]

I disagree though with your assessment on "ultra conservatives want it gone and screw anyone without". Conservatives are not out to screw anyone, and feel the free market is the best driver of lowering costs. They also know the government has a long history of making things worse when involved. And before Obamacare my healthcare insurance was a lot lower than it is with Obamacare.

I agree, they should repeal Obamacare then work on a replacement later, which hopefully will never materialize. Too many GOP politicians feel they will receive an overwhelming amount of bad publicity for "kicking off millions of people currently on Obamacare"...and leaving them out to die in the streets. That's why some are adamant on replace at the same time. Real Republicans don't want socialized medicine, and will not support a government replacement. Even though the Republicans are united in repeal, some want replacement not because they think their constituents like it, but because of the fear of the inevitable backlash and false narrative that will come from the biased media. Personally, I think the backlash will be worse for those politicians advocating replacement.

Many GOP politicians want to replace Obamacare at the same time as repeal. Many GOP politicians want to repeal only without replacement. So the common theme is they all want to repeal. The disagreements come with the replace. So far, the only vote included replace...which too many GOP members will not vote for to have it pass. If you polled every GOP House and Senate member about repealing Obamacare, the vote would be unanimous to repeal.

I'm shocked you keep pushing the narrative that many Republicans like Obamacare. Republicans are in the most lock-step agreement to repeal Obamacare than any other issue I've seen in my lifetime. Many of the GOP politicians want to replace Obamacare...that is where the disagreements are.

Wow, you really think he hasn't passed anything? You need to get out of your safe space and gander over to some real news sources, in which you will see a litany of items already passed. I guess "lack of information" is expected when worshipping the Fake News sources only. And thank God for the GOP blocking Obama's ridiculous platform. Even with the GOP's opposition Obama managed to get us 20 trillion dollars in debt. Can you imagine what the debt would be if it wasn't for the "obstructionists"?

That's way more than we should have given Obama.

But you want to give them more control over our lives. Why is that?

I would be willing to bet the university would fire him in a second if he reversed roles and tweeted "All I want for Christmas is a minority genocide". Not only would he be fired seconds after he hit send, but the FBI would probably be paying him a visit also. I thought Tucker Carlson handled him nicely last night. Tucker was way more restrained than I could have been to that arrogant condescending...I'll just stop right there.

Breitbart, the website that brings out the vibrant and vivid true colors of the party of hate.

He has a long, long way to go before he can even be nominated for that title, especially when the undisputed title-holder just left office.

It is illegal to shoot someone without cause. Are you implying that no one is ever shot without cause? I'm pretty sure we can deduce who is having problems understanding how wiretapping...and the real world works.

This brings flashbacks of when Joe Biden said that Supreme Court nominees shouldn't receive a vote during the last year of a presidential term, then spouts that Merrick Garland should have received a vote. It is pretty funny when a past comment comes back to bite you. My question is, which of these two men evolved and which one flip-flopped?

What does this have to do with anything in my post...that you quoted?

Oh I do. I was just giving a different possible angle on why he is asking for immunity. I have no idea who knows what and when, but I've seen that a few Liberal commentators have already convicted him just because he is seeking immunity. I think one of them uttered [paraphrased] "If he's seeking immunity, he must be guilty of something", as to definitively state there was no other possible reasoning for the immunity request.

Are you implying he's guilty of something...without a trial? Could it possibly be he's seen up close and personal the underhandedness of the previous administration, and Liberals in general, and wants to ensure he will not be railroaded by corruptness?

I would rather see his grades for myself...which I can't. So answer your own question...what does Obama have to hide? And who are these people "with any sense about that"? Are they the mainstream media that fawned over Obama for 8 years? The same ones that refused to write anything negative about him? Are these the ones you are suggesting I ask for an opinion? Now that deserves the obligatory LOL.

I'm just going to have to reiterate your question...what did Obama have to hide? After all, you did imply that Trump might be trying to hide something by not releasing the White House visitor records. In that same token, what did Obama have to hide by sealing his school records? Did Obama actually get a special rate or special acceptance for claiming to be a foreign student? Did Obama's grades not confirm that he was the scholar the media made him out to be? Did Obama have some secret ties to Communist professors? Did Obama have any class reports that don't conform to American values? These questions seem to be as relevant as questioning the White House visitor logs. And when you say "your grasping for straws"...my response will be "ditto".

Just following your lead. I would call you an idiot but I don't want to plagiarize Big Girl. And your attitude is just symptomatic of someone that can't muster an intelligent retort. The childishness is exposed by like childishness. Who would have guessed. It explains the phenomenon of the emergence of the snowflakes after the Trump election win. Thanks for the validation.

So creating two new jobs somehow equates to cutting thousands of jobs. You actually want to focus on two new ones? Really? And you didn't say a peep about all of the Federal jobs Obama created just to fund his cronies and campaign contributors. No, you want to disparagingly focus on Trump creating two, yes two, jobs. (And I'm not even sure if they're new positions.) And why is Meals On Wheels being funded at all by the Federal government, you know, by those people that don't give a damn about anyone but themselves. Now get back on topic. How do you feel about companies selling your browsing history? Do you even have an opinion or will you write some other rant about how corrupt politicians are but want to give them more control over our lives?

Too easy. Exposing your flawed rationale is enough.

So to clarify your answer...you have no answer.

And you are at the very top of the list.

Is there a reason you quoted my post to make this response? Are you trying to refute anything I posted? And I'm finding it more and more odd on why you constantly complain about how corrupt the government has become, but yet advocate for bigger and bigger government with more control. Can you please explain that rationale? Do you think if the government gets big enough the politicians will suddenly turn into moral, wholesome, caring people, or would a bigger government just involve more dirtbag government officials? And is more dirtbag government officials better or worse for the country?