Jump to content

AggiesAreWe

SETXsports Director/Manager
  • Posts

    84,418
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    553

Everything posted by AggiesAreWe

  1. [quote name="scooter!" post="822375" timestamp="1280677501"] He'll eventually start. Isn't pat white lil bro there also? [/quote] Yes, plays reciever. Through the summer workouts, JJ is the strongest of all the QB's, doing the most reps in the bench press than any of the QB's. Jeremy is also the 4th fastest player on the whole team, only the starting RB, 1 reciever and a DB turned in the fastest 40 and 60 times. JJ is having a good summer and is looking forward to the start of the season. He will get every opportunity to win the starting QB position this season.
  2. [quote name="82 5A State Champs" post="822287" timestamp="1280597845"] [b]Thats probably the most accurate poll I've seen[/b]. We'll see what the AP poll looks like. [/quote] I agree.
  3. [quote name="BMTSoulja1" post="822034" timestamp="1280503162"] All I'll say is that the three teams that are above us, we've beaten last year.. Are of those wins were blowouts and the other team just lost their blue chipper Mr. Everything QB...  Other than that, my lips are sealed... :-X :-X :-X :-X [/quote] Three teams?? Isn't more like 40 teams since Central did not make the rankings at all?
  4. [quote name="sleepy" post="822011" timestamp="1280501057"] [quote author=SFAJACK02 link=topic=71272.msg821989#msg821989 date=1280496713] He will be there in a few years I bet you!! If he acts right and stays in school. [/quote] Please tell me you are serious!!!!!!!! I will make whatever bet you want!!!!! [/quote] I want some of that action!!
  5. Unbelievable!!! No Central! ::) Soulja, what say you?
  6. Hmmmm.... Kirbyville #10, WOS #20. I don't think so. Reverse them would be better. (I also think Jasper and Silsbee should be higher)
  7. But College Sporting News doesn't say which philosophy is better in the recruiting angle. Just states that Lamar has a lot of transfers and Texas St. doesn't. So what does that prove? Absolutely nothing. TT, you are the only one saying it's a bad decision. Only time will tell if it is or not.
  8. [quote name="LUFAN" post="821833" timestamp="1280429569"] Well here is the things I know terror did not agree with. 1) We did not hire a big name coach 2) We are going to play in the SLC in 2011 3) We brought in to many transfers 4) We did not do a good enough job marketing our start up [/quote] So let me get this straight. Because TT did not agree with these decisions, that makes them bad decisions. Okay.... ::) (and people thought electing Obama as President was a good decision) ;)
  9. [quote name="WOSgrad" post="821818" timestamp="1280427814"] [quote author=FriendswoodFan link=topic=71184.msg821806#msg821806 date=1280426221] [quote author=skipper link=topic=71184.msg821409#msg821409 date=1280326084] if you like to talk about speed and BIG FAST linemen and backs,wo-s will tell you to take a look at silsbee,kirbyville and jasper [/quote] No offense intended (although I am certain it will be taken), but you are kind of making my point.  You think of teams like Silsbee, Kirbyville and Jasper when someone mentions that Friendswood is a big, fast team.  Ask your friends from Dayton -- which has been the most accomplished SETX team over the last 5 years if not longer -- whether those types of teams are comparable to what the typical Friendswood teams brings to the field.      [/quote] None taken, here.  Although WO-S does match up with Friendswood speed wise (team speed has never been a problem at WO-S), there is no doubt that Friendswood will be the biggest team WO-S faces (both in number of players and size on the field).  I fully accept the fact that very few outside of the cities of Orange, West Orange and Pinehurst actually expect WO-S to win this one.  For anyone to think different would be foolish.  Which is one of the things that makes it a dangerous one for Friendswood.  WO-S really doesn't have anything to lose.  If Friendswood wins! Hey! They were supposed to!  If they lose, you start talking about a huge upset going which provides that much extra of a confidence boost for the Mustangs along the Sabine. [/quote] All so very true, Grad. But I bet there will still be one or two WOS fans(you know who they are) that will come up with some excuses if WOS loses this game. ;)
  10. [quote name="utfan06" post="821820" timestamp="1280427998"] AAW you said earlier that the two Seniors helped out Kountze in the second day of pool play?? LOL Zay is the only senior on the team this year:) [b]Lynn is a Jr.[/b] :) [/quote] Maybe so, but his last year to play. Heard he was opting out of his senior year to go pro. ;)
  11. SLC teams: Lamar      2971 SFA          2419 Texas St.  1654 UTSA        1553 A&M CC    1543 SHSU        1434 Northwestern  1268 C. Ark.        1134 UTA            756 Southeastern  746 McNeese        550 Nicholls          328
  12. [b]Among Woodard's goals when he made the schedule was to play as many Southland teams as possible. Woodard scheduled games against those schools for early in the season because the league locks them into playing conference games late in the season[/b] The reason these are early season games. ;) [b]Lamar's fifth game this season will be against a fourth Southland team, Sam Houston State, picked to finish in the lower half of the eight-team league[/b] Maybe this is a winable game for the Cards. ;) ;D
  13. [quote name="the sports guy" post="821748" timestamp="1280417586"] District 19-4A Jasper 770 Silsbee 853 Livingston 1148 Huffman 924 Cleveland 886 Splendora 910 I wouldnt mind the drive at all if this was district play.  [/quote] I do agree, it is a little spread out, isn't it? ;D
  14. Why is everybody behind? Silsbee started 2 a days three weeks ago. oops ;D
  15. This thread....... ::)
  16. Having Jasper, Silsbee, Livingston and Cleveland in the same district would bring back some old 4A memories from way back. These schools used to be in the same 4A district many years ago.
  17. Can't wait to see how Matt has our local 3A's and 2A's. Great stuff, Matt. Keep it coming.
  18. Our local 5A: District 19-5A Baytown Lee 1860 Baytown Memorial 1646 Bmt. Central 1624 Crosby 1448 Nederland 1459 Dayton 1434
  19. Our local 6A: District 22-6A Baytown Sterling 2338 Beaumont West Brook 2467 Pt Arthur Memorial 2460 Channelview 2285 LaPorte 2278 Galena Park North Shore 4416
  20. Good stuff, Matt. This is what our local 4A districts could look like: District 19-4A Jasper 770 Silsbee 853 Livingston 1148 Huffman 924 Cleveland 886 Splendora 910 District 20-4A Bmt. Ozen 1227 Barbers Hill 1181 LCM 1125 Lumberton 1063.5 PNG 1401 Vidor 1416
  21. [quote name="Tigers9" post="821488" timestamp="1280342083"] [quote author=AggiesAreWe link=topic=71234.msg821474#msg821474 date=1280339703] I know that one of those "softball" girls that is playing volleyball at Silsbee is playing select softball at a high level. She was accomendated for her missing some time and she was allowed to get her practice pitching in during volleyball season, I know this as fact. There is no "all or nothing" rule pertaining to Silsbee volleyball. Players and coaches are and have been working things out. It is not what you are trying to make it out to be or how you are spinning it for folks here on the site. Years ago when Silsbee had another volleyball coach, that may have been the case, but it is not that way now. You might want to do some checking. [/quote] Apparently you arent up to the "facts" Mike........AND, I dont need a spin! I dealt with the current coach and assistant coach badgering my kid about playing VB just last year. I did all I could to convince her to play.......she was not willing to take the consequnces for missing, so she decided to just not play. Now if you are saying they have "changed" their policy since then.........GREAT! Still doesnt mean Ive exaggerated or added a spin! But then again when you coach the first team to NOT make the playoffs in 20 years.......maybe you should "change" something! "at a high level" well, we will just have to agree to disagree on the definition of that! I did notice you didnt even touch the other examples I stated.........cant wait to see if certain football players who were arrested for breaking into a school building OR for being arrested for drugs.....show up and participate in 2 a days! [/quote] There was no need to speak about those "other" examples. The point I was making was in regards to the volleyball/softball issue. I spoke to the volleyball coaches and they told me how it is. BTW, your other examples said nothing about football players breaking into schools and getting arrested for drugs. ;) (I know you have a personal vendetta with the football team and it's coaches, I'm cool with that) Carry on.
  22. I know that one of those "softball" girls that is playing volleyball at Silsbee is playing select softball at a high level. She was accomendated for her missing some time and she was allowed to get her practice pitching in during volleyball season, I know this as fact. There is no "all or nothing" rule pertaining to Silsbee volleyball. Players and coaches are and have been working things out. It is not what you are trying to make it out to be or how you are spinning it for folks here on the site. Years ago when Silsbee had another volleyball coach, that may have been the case, but it is not that way now. You might want to do some checking.
  23. [quote name="Buddy09" post="821437" timestamp="1280332126"] This has been a good thread to read but am I correct in saying we are talking about "Southern Nationals",  "Southern Nationals"  come on  "Southern Nationals". Is this not the tournament for all the teams that did not qualify for the REAL Nationals. Anyone who plays ASA can attend this one. Will not be any coaches watching this one. May be time to start Volleyball practice. [/quote] WOW!!!! Now this sheds new light on the subject. ;) So anyone can play this tourney, hmmmmm..... So this team did not qualify, hmmmmmm.... No college scouts will be attending, hmmmmmmm..... This isn't the "year long trying to qualify" tourney, like it was mentioned before, hmmmmmmmm...... Interesting ;) ;D ::)
×
×
  • Create New...