Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. Fix our country’s election fraud or nothing changes.
  3. Shocking!! An oil millionaire gives money to governor of largest oil state in the nation. First time for everything!! 🤣
  4. What does Vance stand for? I don’t know. I can’t name a single thing. I at least know where Paul is on issues, and most align with my thoughts. Rand Paul on the issues: [Hidden Content]
  5. From this X post: "After it was revealed 50 Mosques have opened in the Dallas Fort Worth area in the last 24 months , a woman has uncovered that Texas Gov. Greg Abbott‘s largest donor is a Muslim Pakistani who has given him more than $14 million , including $2 million this year alone..."
  6. Except for Brookeland I was really wrong in our district. But they just may do it who knows.
  7. Republicans need to play this ad nonstop through the midterms!
  8. Of course. I want to be wrong and hope I am wrong. But just like my sports betting, I don't make picks on emotion.
  9. To big to rig. Even CBS has to tell the truth. Again, like I said before, when NBC stopped talking about it you know it was a home run speech!
  10. It would be nice if you are wrong. Just saying
  11. It is what it is, democrats have no positive talking points in relation to their policies, simply anti Trump.
  12. I'm thinking Vance/Rubio. Then after 8 years Rubio/Gabbard.
  13. Definitely most likely.
  14. That is AMAZING.....lol
  15. Not a Paul fan in some things. I believe we are going to see a Vance/Rubio ticket.
  16. Sad to see. This team was just in the state championship less than 10 years ago. Sucks to see how far down this program has came.
  17. Today
  18. I would much prefer this over Vance/Rubio. Paul would provide some good balance to reign in government overreach.
  19. We are borrowing money to fight other countries wars. We are about to hit 40 trillion in debt. That to me is more a National Security risk. Just wondering what happened to America First. There better be solid intel that we don’t know about.
  20. Agree 100%. Sometimes we think we have the knowledge to make a call on how a situation should be handled, which is naive. And this applies to much more than just Iran. It comes down to hoping the folks in power are making the right calls. Thank God Harris and Waltz aren’t making the call.
  21. That is not at all the same thing. You seem to know all about how the FBI works and what goes into tapping phone lines? Please explain why they are innocent and did not break policy......I even gave you some help of how it all works in my last post....explain away
  22. I wouldn’t have any major issues with a Rubio/Paul ticket. Sort of a complementary ticket of strength & global experience along with restraint of government & civil liberties. If they’d work together well, it could be a very good pairing for the country.
  23. I'm not happy with Trump's approach to Iran or any other conflict he may be medaling in. However, I realize there may be much more intel of happenings going on the world that we know nothing about. I just hope he knows what he's doing because it can be a powder keg.
  24. and you do? The FBI recording of a conversation between Susie Wiles and her attorney when her attorney was aware. In the FBI files there will be multiple forms of documentation about this. This is called "consensual monitoring" -- where one party to the conversation is aware the FBI is listening and recording but the other does not, and the party that is aware agrees to that. The FBI cannot do this on its own. It must seek and obtain approval from a DOJ prosecutor to do so. Some states have laws against one-party consent -- called "Two Party" states -- and require both parties to be aware and agree that the call is going to be monitored and recorded. Others are what is called "One-Party" states. Florida is a Two-Party state -- meaning the call as described was a violation of state law. The FBI is allowed to violate state law while conducting an investigation -- same principle as undercover work. But the attorney involved, if also in Florida and a member of the Florida State Bar, likely is not protected in all respects. The FBI could authorize him to violate Florida law -- but there will be another FBI document showing that as well. That document does not protect him for violations of his ethical obligations that apply to his license. And lets not forget that the FBI only investigates crimes. To get to the point of having a recorded call between a "subject" and that persons attorney, whatever this investigation was has proceeded well down the tracks. Finally, there are a host of DOJ Regulations about the manner in which attorneys can be investigated with regard to allegations of criminal conduct against their clients or others. Finally, you don't just hook up an attorney in a consensually monitored call without having a detailed history recorded in the case file about how you got to that point. It is highly likely this call was going to happen according to a "script" -- the FBI/DOJ had specific issues they wanted the attorney to discuss or ask about. _ShipwreckedCrew Lets see what happens.......
  25. Silsbee vs. Houston ISD teams over the last 13 seasons (2013-present) Overall record 26-8 Playoff record 19-6 Since the 2016 season, Silsbee is 15-3 vs. Houston ISD in the playoffs. The three losses were to Yates in 2019 regional final, Washington in 2023 regional final, Wheatley in 2025 2nd round. Wheatley ended up in state championship game. One could say that Silsbee has owned Houston ISD over the last dozen years. I see the overall going to 26-9, playoff record to 19-7.
  1. Load more activity


×
×
  • Create New...