Jump to content

2012 Lamar Football Schedule


Recommended Posts

http://www.beaumontenterprise.com/sports/lamar/article/Lamar-announces-2012-football-schedule-3196800.php?cmpid=twitter



Here's the schedule:

Sept. 1: at Louisiana-Lafayette

Sept. 8: vs. Prairie View A&M

Sept. 15: at Hawaii

Sept. 22: vs. Langston

Sept. 29: vs. Southeastern Louisiana*

Oct. 6: at Northwestern State*

Oct. 13: vs. McMurry University

Oct. 20: at Central Arkansas*

Oct. 27: vs. Sam Houston St.*

Nov. 3: at Stephen F. Austin*

Nov. 10: vs. Nicholls St.*

Nov. 17: at McNeese St.*

Nov. 24:

* - Southland Conference game

Times TBA.

Read more: http://www.beaumontenterprise.com/sports/lamar/article/Lamar-announces-2012-football-schedule-3196800.php#ixzz1luauZaeP
Link to comment
Share on other sites


[i]Woodard said he knew to call ULL because the school had asked about scheduling a 2012 game against Lamar several months earlier.

But because Lamar already had two FBS schools on the schedule, Lamar declined the offer[/i].

gimme a break Ray--ULL has had one good season since the advent of electricity ---and we were gonna pass em by????



Link to comment
Share on other sites

dont be hating to much on langston

here's Prairie View
[i]The team lost 80 consecutive games in 1989-98, almost doubling Columbia University's 44 straight losses between 1983-1988.[10]

On November 10, 2007, it clinched its first winning season since 1976 with a 30-27 victory over traditional power Jackson State University under coach Henry Frazier, III.[/i][/i]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    45,968
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    yielder
    Newest Member
    yielder
    Joined


  • Posts

    • I haven’t been watching closely, but even the liberal sources even tell the story as “the defense really took apart Cohen’s testimony on Thursday.” It sounds like sloppy work from the prosecution to point out a specific call as being “the one,” when it was easily concluded that this particular call could not have occurred the way that Cohen (and the prosecution) claim it to have happened.    The bad news is that I doubt that it matters much-I suspect that most jurors minds were closed before testimony started.   I don’t see Trump leaving with anything less than a conviction based on the venue (NYC).
    • Tough case all the way around.  The guy had a lot of online activity come out where he made racist statements and statements about killing BLM protesters and looters.  So when he then goes out and does it, it looks really bad.  I've seen a lot of videos where people have driven through protestors, defended themselves against them, etc., and didn't bat an eye.  This feels different, but that doesn't necessarily make it murder, either.  His account of the events that happened vs. the witness accounts were both very different, but I'd also expect both sides' accounts to be self-serving and inaccurate to fit their narrative.  Not really sure what to think on this one.  
    • @CardinalBacker   Wanted to get your thoughts on how Cohen did as Bragg's star witness..... My Take: The State spent two days acknowledging that Cohen lied all the time but now he has come clean,,,,,,,it took the defense (having same evidence state had), just a few hours to confirm Cohen lied to the current jury a couple days ago......  While I thought initially Trump would be found guilty due to venue, with best case a hung jury, there is now a pretty good chance he will be acquitted...... Thoughts anyone??   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • I can only imagine what you over heard. With most of that group there’s no telling. 
    • If I recall at that time you had protestors all all over the country jumping on cars while people were in them......While I agree it was stupid shooting him, how do you know what a guy is going to do walking up to you with an exposed gun? At the time I thought it was justified simply because you can't know the drivers level of fear......  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...