Jump to content

DISTRICT 32 LITTLE LEAGUE TOURNAMENT (12 year old) - CHAMPION, BRIDGE CITY


Recommended Posts

[quote name="Stretch" post="1023191" timestamp="1310146689"]
It should have been dealt with at the affadavit meeting.........the ADA should have paid attention to what was going on..........PN should have read the rule book..............sounds like you all are part of the problem.

BC is just catching alot of heat because the ADA is from there and this all looks fishy. Im sorry but everyone from the area knows the favortism that goes on with that League. Its pretty sad during several games I witnessed the umps and BC coaches butt grabbing in between innings and also cutting up with folks in the stands. Its getting pretty old! Why cause BC has nice fields and some good food at the concession stands....lol!! Cause talent wise.........there is tough competition in this whole district from every city.......and its just gonna get tougher.

If folks are going to resign cause of this situation, so be it it will only help the rest of the District! And honestly I hope the next time a question comes up and is brought to our ADA he opens that green book and gives the correct answer, this would never be the case if that would have happened......sorry kid you got screwed cause Im Mr No It All!!

Good luck GNLL!!! Yall Got This!!!


[/quote]Sorry to be the barrier of bad news but the ADA IS NOT from Bridge City..the DA is. And who cares if our coaches "grab" butts? LOL I do believe all coaches do the same  ;) Bridge City has an awesome program IMO, not only because of the "nice fields/good food" as you say, but the people in general!

This pointing fingers towards Bridge City is just an easy way out for the people involved, not wanting to take the blame. Mistakes are made daily. LEARN from it and dont make the same mistake next year, or ever for that matter!



GO BCLL!!! WE got this!!!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 103
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

kf89 as long as you have continious participation in the league, in other words my 2 year old will be able to play as long as my other sons stay involved. If for any reason they take a year off then the grandfather clause is void. Also on this note, if my sons play out (in other words reach the age of 12) and have remained in WELL then any sibling following them may join once they reach playing age.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Porkchop, the Dist 32 DA can't be blamed for this mistake. The affidavit used by little league to verify eligible players are filled out by the Manager of the team. It is then checked by the player agent of the league and finally the League President. Once these three people sign off on the affidavit (stating these are eligible players) then the DA signs off on it. He is checking for Birth Cert.-Proof of Residence-league boundaries. I would find it hard to blame the DA in this matter. This should be a lesson to all that manager an All Star teams.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Porkchop
Good luck to both Groves and BCLL tonight.. No blame on Dist 32 DA.. Just hope everyone that was involved learned a lesson. There is to much he said she said to know the complete truth. The right call was made not doubt, a rule was violated so you must except the penalty and move on. I think it just took some time to set in for some of the folks from PN cause they had no idea something was wrong. They just knew that all the boys playing on the all start team were the proper age and from PN and played at PNLL. (just didnt know that one of the boys played up with the 13 & 14 yr olds). Either way good luck to Dist 32 in the next round! Either team (GNLL & BCLL) will make everyone from Dist 32 proud......
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    45,968
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    yielder
    Newest Member
    yielder
    Joined



×
×
  • Create New...