It Was Only A Matter Of Time

[bullets13]

19 hours ago, baddog said:

It was rhetorical. Chuckie will be at the top of the list. Him and his cronies will forget all about unarmed Ashli Babbitt.

I defended the shooting of Ashli Babbitt. I defend the ICE officer in this shooting. We can't expect the officer to interpret intent in a split second. 

[OlDawg]

10 minutes ago, bullets13 said:

there's articles from legitimate sources where Good's wife is quoted as blaming herself for making her go to the protests. Her mother is straight up lying.

Yep. Of course, she’s being called a ‘legal observer’ now. Apparently, that’s the new name for someone interfering in law enforcement operations.

I do feel sorry for her 6 year old son. Apparently, his father has passed away already also.

[thetragichippy]

47 minutes ago, OlDawg said:

I do feel sorry for her 6 year old son. Apparently, his father has passed away already also.

I do to, and apparently she didn't have someone that could help her from being stupid. 

When my Son was less than 2 years old, I was invited to race a car on a dirt track in the bomber class off Hwy 90.  I invited family and friends because I was so excited. I came in second to qualify and ended up 8th overall in the Novice division and even won $150.00..... Being super excited and having an absolute blast, after the race I told my Father I wanted to start racing, and eventually move to the modified class. He took me off to the side and told me I had a kid to raise, and I should not get into any hobby that could leave me crimple or dead......I took raising my Son serious and never gave racing a second thought. Moral of story, I think I've read she had 3 kids.....now orphans because of a stupid decision she made, and with just a tiny bit of thought, she could have came to the conclusion it may end in death or a minimum jail.....

[Big girl]

5 hours ago, OlDawg said:

It’s a shame, and a waste of life. I don’t understand why people think ICE operations are any different than FBI operations. I seriously doubt if protestors would be blocking an FBI raid.

I dont think that FBI agents cover their faces. Some agent is going to get killed because they approached someone who didnt know who they were

[OlDawg]

1 hour ago, thetragichippy said:

I do to, and apparently she didn't have someone that could help her from being stupid. 

When my Son was less than 2 years old, I was invited to race a car on a dirt track in the bomber class off Hwy 90.  I invited family and friends because I was so excited. I came in second to qualify and ended up 8th overall in the Novice division and even won $150.00..... Being super excited and having an absolute blast, after the race I told my Father I wanted to start racing, and eventually move to the modified class. He took me off to the side and told me I had a kid to raise, and I should not get into any hobby that could leave me crimple or dead......I took raising my Son serious and never gave racing a second thought. Moral of story, I think I've read she had 3 kids.....now orphans because of a stupid decision she made, and with just a tiny bit of thought, she could have came to the conclusion it may end in death or a minimum jail.....

TDS. According to this article, they moved to Canada when Trump was elected in 2024. Had just recently moved back. Apparently they decided the best use of their time was this stupidity.

Not sure how well her mother actually knew her daughter...

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

[Slim Charles]

20 minutes ago, Big girl said:

I dont think that FBI agents cover their faces. Some agent is going to get killed because they approached someone who didnt know who they were

I guess the big badge, handcuffs, gun and vest with huge ICE or HSE across it is not enough for someone to know who they are LOL. That's a clown take. If your ilk weren't out there doxxing and threatening them, they wouldn't have to wear a mask.

[Slim Charles]

She's a mother. Maybe instead of cosplaying some commie revolutionary protestor, she should have been focused on being a good parent to her child. Or you know....get a job. Or maybe this was her job courtesy of George Soros or some commie NGO, 

[LumRaiderFan]

36 minutes ago, Big girl said:

I dont think that FBI agents cover their faces. Some agent is going to get killed because they approached someone who didnt know who they were

They seem to have figured out who to throw stuff at, maybe if the left wasn’t doxxing ICE agents, they wouldn’t have to cover their face.

ICE is doing nothing wrong, simply doing their job.

[baddog]

 

[tvc184]

6 hours ago, Big girl said:

I dont think that FBI agents cover their faces. Some agent is going to get killed because they approached someone who didnt know who they were

It’s claimed logic that I don’t understand.

Let’s see, he is in a patrol vehicle with lights, he is wearing police gear, he has a badge and patches that say police but I can’t see his face so it might not be the police. 

Oh wait, I can clearly see his eyes and nose now, yep, that’s a cop because I can see his eyes and nose!!

Because you can tell by a person’s profession by his face? That would be like me walking through the mall and pointing at someone and saying, that’s a firefighter, that’s a nurse, that’s a secretary……

[OlDawg]

In related news, there was a mostly peaceful shooting of TDA gang members in Portland as they attempted to run down Federal officers. Liberals are outraged and telling ICE to get out of Portland.

Seems to be a common refrain, regardless of the status of the victim or their actions. Only the actions of the officers are being criticized.

[OlDawg]

In a quirky—but true—twist of fate, the street where protesters were interfering with Federal Law Enforcement and Mrs. Good was fatally shot in Minneapolis?

Portland Ave.

[OlDawg]

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

[Reagan]

I can say with 100% certitude that if she was killed by an illegal alien you would not hear a word about it from the left!

[baddog]

21 minutes ago, Reagan said:

I can say with 100% certitude that if she was killed by an illegal alien you would not hear a word about it from the left!

To continue with those type sentiments….

 

[baddog]

 

[baddog]

Strong language warning. Viewer discretion. This is body cam footage of the officer who was hit.

 

[baddog]

Well, I guess that video tells the tale……except for the mayor. He dismissed it saying the agent limped away. What a POS. People like him are the reason she’s dead.

[tvc184]

In Plumhoff v. Rickard, the Supreme Court issued a ruling on a police vehicle chase that ended up in a parking lot with the suspect vehicle stopped briefly and surrounded by police cars or officers. The driver backed up in a U-turn and took off again, almost striking officers. The vehicle was then past all officers so none were in direct danger. Officers opened fire into the back of the fleeing vehicle, killing the driver and passenger. The ruling was unanimous that the use of force was lawful. Even though no officers were in direct line of the vehicle at that time, to continue the chase would endanger the public and officers.

In Graham v. Connor the police mistakenly thought that Graham might have been involved in an armed robbery. When they stopped him, he was acting irrationally and jumping around outside of the car. The officers used force on Graham and I believe broke his foot. It turns out that Graham was having a diabetic crisis and was completely innocent. So the officers mistakenly stopped the vehicle that he was riding in and then mistook his serious medical crisis as resistance. Graham sued all the way to the Supreme Court. A unanimous Supreme Court ruling said that the officers’ use the force was reasonable under the circumstances as they appeared to be to the officers actually at the scene. In their writing, the Supreme Court said that the officers had to make split second decisions and it was not something that could be decided calmly months later in a judge’s chambers.

It’s not difficult. If you use force against officers or if you are told to stop and you don’t, you might be opening yourself up to having lawful force or deadly force used against you. The Supreme Court does not appear to be sympathetic to people who resist because they believe in a cause. 

The First Amendment guarantees the right of the people peaceably to assemble.  Blocking or obstructing the police or using force against them is not a peaceable assembly. 

Just sayin’…..

[baddog]

7 hours ago, tvc184 said:

In Plumhoff v. Rickard, the Supreme Court issued a ruling on a police vehicle chase that ended up in a parking lot with the suspect vehicle stopped briefly and surrounded by police cars or officers. The driver backed up in a U-turn and took off again, almost striking officers. The vehicle was then past all officers so none were in direct danger. Officers opened fire into the back of the fleeing vehicle, killing the driver and passenger. The ruling was unanimous that the use of force was lawful. Even though no officers were in direct line of the vehicle at that time, to continue the chase would endanger the public and officers.

In Graham v. Connor the police mistakenly thought that Graham might have been involved in an armed robbery. When they stopped him, he was acting irrationally and jumping around outside of the car. The officers used force on Graham and I believe broke his foot. It turns out that Graham was having a diabetic crisis and was completely innocent. So the officers mistakenly stopped the vehicle that he was riding in and then mistook his serious medical crisis as resistance. Graham sued all the way to the Supreme Court. A unanimous Supreme Court ruling said that the officers’ use the force was reasonable under the circumstances as they appeared to be to the officers actually at the scene. In their writing, the Supreme Court said that the officers had to make split second decisions and it was not something that could be decided calmly months later in a judge’s chambers.

It’s not difficult. If you use force against officers or if you are told to stop and you don’t, you might be opening yourself up to having lawful force or deadly force used against you. The Supreme Court does not appear to be sympathetic to people who resist because they believe in a cause. 

The First Amendment guarantees the right of the people peaceably to assemble.  Blocking or obstructing the police or using force against them is not a peaceable assembly. 

Just sayin’…..

Out of likes….I’m sure you remember the Beaumont gang banger who was shot and killed by police at Jack-in-the-Box on MLK a few years back. He lunged his car at the officer and he opened fire. The perp’s bullet-proof vest didn’t save him. I believe the officer who killed him was somehow related to a female officer who was hit on the Delaware overpass, while on a traffic stop, and fell to her death a few weeks earlier. The gang banger’s death was ruled justified.

People know they can’t use their vehicle as a weapon, but they do it anyway. Liberal mentality clogs the mind.

[thetragichippy]

9 hours ago, tvc184 said:

In Plumhoff v. Rickard, the Supreme Court issued a ruling on a police vehicle chase that ended up in a parking lot with the suspect vehicle stopped briefly and surrounded by police cars or officers. The driver backed up in a U-turn and took off again, almost striking officers. The vehicle was then past all officers so none were in direct danger. Officers opened fire into the back of the fleeing vehicle, killing the driver and passenger. The ruling was unanimous that the use of force was lawful. Even though no officers were in direct line of the vehicle at that time, to continue the chase would endanger the public and officers.

In Graham v. Connor the police mistakenly thought that Graham might have been involved in an armed robbery. When they stopped him, he was acting irrationally and jumping around outside of the car. The officers used force on Graham and I believe broke his foot. It turns out that Graham was having a diabetic crisis and was completely innocent. So the officers mistakenly stopped the vehicle that he was riding in and then mistook his serious medical crisis as resistance. Graham sued all the way to the Supreme Court. A unanimous Supreme Court ruling said that the officers’ use the force was reasonable under the circumstances as they appeared to be to the officers actually at the scene. In their writing, the Supreme Court said that the officers had to make split second decisions and it was not something that could be decided calmly months later in a judge’s chambers.

It’s not difficult. If you use force against officers or if you are told to stop and you don’t, you might be opening yourself up to having lawful force or deadly force used against you. The Supreme Court does not appear to be sympathetic to people who resist because they believe in a cause. 

The First Amendment guarantees the right of the people peaceably to assemble.  Blocking or obstructing the police or using force against them is not a peaceable assembly. 

Just sayin’…..

They REALLY need to teach "common sense 101" in grade school. It is mind boggling to read on social media the bogus legal theories on why the ice agent it guilty of murder and why the protestor was just trying to peacefully leave the scene.....The sad part it is not just idiot random posters, it is State Representatives and Government officials .....

[OlDawg]

As one of the more independent posters, the below quotes from the article ring true to me.

"This isn't 2020 anymore, and a lot of Americans' eyes have opened during 2020 from the COVID shutdowns, the mandates, the censorship, the nightly riots, the election fraud, and it's just not going to work anymore," said Ries. "People can see what's really happening and decide for themselves, not just take mainstream media's word for it or mainstream media omission of facts as the truth."

"The left has built their political house of cards on mass migration, immigration fraud. Now it seems welfare fraud for political kickbacks, for votes, for headcount, for the census, which determines congressional districts, which in turn determines electoral college votes for the presidency. This is all about politics and if we had valid elections and valid censuses that only counted U.S. citizens for congressional apportionment, how different would the political map look right now? That's the question."

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

[OlDawg]

33 minutes ago, thetragichippy said:

They REALLY need to teach "common sense 101" in grade school. It is mind boggling to read on social media the bogus legal theories on why the ice agent it guilty of murder and why the protestor was just trying to peacefully leave the scene.....The sad part it is not just idiot random posters, it is State Representatives and Government officials .....

Public school and common sense don't really go together anymore. Not sure they ever did. That's why we called it 'life skills', and we learned as we went. Now, it's called critical thinking. Had to rename it since it's not common.

You won't hear a peep from the Hollywood crowd that jumped all over this either. The only thing I've seen is them slamming the training of the officer because he shouldn't have been recording with his cell phone. Had to flip the narrative after the last video make them look foolish again.

[thetragichippy]

1 hour ago, OlDawg said:

Public school and common sense don't really go together anymore. Not sure they ever did. That's why we called it 'life skills', and we learned as we went. Now, it's called critical thinking. Had to rename it since it's not common.

You won't hear a peep from the Hollywood crowd that jumped all over this either. The only thing I've seen is them slamming the training of the officer because he shouldn't have been recording with his cell phone. Had to flip the narrative after the last video make them look foolish again.

Yup, and the other thing is folks confusing policy with law. 

They say he walked in front of her car.....He did, kinda. The video from afar I watched, he starts walking up to the car as it is in reverse. My guess is he thought she was actually complying by backing up off the road.  So he did not get Infront of a vehicle moving towards him, he actually got in "front" of the vehicle as it was moving away from him. Then she throws it in drive and spins her tires and basically side swipes him.