Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
8 minutes ago, gogo173489 said:

 

You can laugh all you want to. This has happened with OF for the last 2 realignments. I can see being just a few under once. Then it happened twice. A third time in my opinion would warrant an investigation. Getting lucky happens. Twice can be a coincidence. Three times there's something more to it.

Posted
9 hours ago, gogo173489 said:

You can laugh all you want to. This has happened with OF for the last 2 realignments. I can see being just a few under once. Then it happened twice. A third time in my opinion would warrant an investigation. Getting lucky happens. Twice can be a coincidence. Three times there's something more to it.

You should volunteer to audit the numbers. Put in a request with UIL and TEA. 

Posted
12 hours ago, gogo173489 said:

You can laugh all you want to. This has happened with OF for the last 2 realignments. I can see being just a few under once. Then it happened twice. A third time in my opinion would warrant an investigation. Getting lucky happens. Twice can be a coincidence. Three times there's something more to it.

Did you really quote yourself and say laugh all you want…wow lol

Posted
On 9/17/2025 at 4:01 PM, 89Falcon said:

Hearing Tarkington is a likely drop down. 

I think the 3A numbers are going to go up this year.  Since it didn’t move last time I see it going up by 15 or 20 

Posted
10 hours ago, 89Falcon said:

You should volunteer to audit the numbers. Put in a request with UIL and TEA. 

I should, or maybe people could just play by the rules? Like I said 3-5 kids under for 2 consecutive counts, ok, it's close. If it happens again for a 3rd consecutive count something is going on.

Posted
27 minutes ago, gogo173489 said:

I should, or maybe people could just play by the rules? Like I said 3-5 kids under for 2 consecutive counts, ok, it's close. If it happens again for a 3rd consecutive count something is going on.

If you have some evidence of OF doing something illegal you should report it to UIL. Sounds like you have some serious information.

Posted
25 minutes ago, 89Falcon said:

If you have some evidence of OF doing something illegal you should report it to UIL. Sounds like you have some serious information.

It's clear in my comments I'm giving my opinion. It won't change if the same results happen this time around.

Posted
3 minutes ago, 89Falcon said:

Understood, you are just making things up that you want to be true.

No, nothing I said was made up. It's 100% true OF has barely been under the last 2 counts. It's my opinion if that happens for a 3rd time it's not a coincidence. 

Posted
10 minutes ago, Drew Peacock said:

Sounds like someone's team that they root for hasn't beaten OF in the past 6 years and wants them out of 3a. I personally have their numbers down from this last alignment, but who knows

I don't think it's only OF does this kind of thing. I think it happens all over the state. I'm only using OF because of the "coincidences" of being one of the largest 3A schools in the state for the last 2 alignments, and they are in setx. 541 last time and 544 was the cutoff. In my opinion it would be difficult for them to decrease in numbers with everything going on for industry in that area of setx. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, gogo173489 said:

I don't think it's only OF does this kind of thing. I think it happens all over the state. I'm only using OF because of the "coincidences" of being one of the largest 3A schools in the state for the last 2 alignments, and they are in setx. 541 last time and 544 was the cutoff. In my opinion it would be difficult for them to decrease in numbers with everything going on for industry in that area of setx. 

If they aren't an open enrollment school then they can pretty much control their own numbers by choosing to accept or deny transfers. Which means they would be able to be just under the cut off every time. Nothing wrong with it. And lets not just act like OF is dominating in every sport. Are they good? Of course. But they aren't making regional runs and further in every sport. I am not sure why OF is rubbing you the wrong way.

Posted
1 hour ago, gogo173489 said:

No, nothing I said was made up. It's 100% true OF has barely been under the last 2 counts. It's my opinion if that happens for a 3rd time it's not a coincidence. 

It is 100% true that you have no evidence that OF has done anything nefarious. It is also 100% true that your accusations are “made up” and based solely on your “imagination”.

Unless you have some proof?

Posted
1 hour ago, gogo173489 said:

I don't think it's only OF does this kind of thing. I think it happens all over the state. I'm only using OF because of the "coincidences" of being one of the largest 3A schools in the state for the last 2 alignments, and they are in setx. 541 last time and 544 was the cutoff. In my opinion it would be difficult for them to decrease in numbers with everything going on for industry in that area of setx. 

There are also instances all over the state of schools who regularly fall just a few students over the cutoff for the classification. With the way the snapshot works it would be hard to cheat the system consistently because they set the enrollment for alignment based off the data from snapshot numbers if I understand it correctly.

Posted
1 hour ago, 89Falcon said:

It is 100% true that you have no evidence that OF has done anything nefarious. It is also 100% true that your accusations are “made up” and based solely on your “imagination”.

Unless you have some proof?

The numbers are the numbers. I didn't make those up. They're facts. Don't ignore them. My accusations are not "imaginary" because they have the basis of previous enrollment numbers. (If it happens) 3 consecutive times just short of moving up to 4A is most certainly worthy of asking the question: What are they doing and how are they doing it? Especially with that particular area of setx growing. 

Posted
37 minutes ago, HarryDoyle said:

There are also instances all over the state of schools who regularly fall just a few students over the cutoff for the classification. With the way the snapshot works it would be hard to cheat the system consistently because they set the enrollment for alignment based off the data from snapshot numbers if I understand it correctly.

I agree. Falling just a few short happens. I'm not talking about it happening once.

Posted
2 minutes ago, gogo173489 said:

I agree. Falling just a few short happens. I'm not talking about it happening once.

I am aware, I am saying it happens more than once a lot. On both sides of being above or below the line, because the UIL needs to keep a certain number of schools in each classification/division. 

Posted

Stop with the rumor chatter/accusing OF on doing something illegal or not. Or any school at that matter. If you have proof send it in to UIL if not. Then this needs to stop immediately and get back on the subject…

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,351
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    maasss
    Newest Member
    maasss
    Joined


×
×
  • Create New...