Ken Paxton Would Crush RINO Cornyn in Texas Senate Primary, Data Confirms.

[mat]

 

[Reagan]

 

 

[Reagan]

 

This is fairly spot on.  Like i said before -- Cornyn lost the run-off when he barely won the primary.  Usually bad for incumbents when this happens!

[DCT]

On 3/4/2026 at 6:16 PM, Porter said:

Yeah….. the Angelic Democrat Party can’t even define what a woman is. Come on CB!

At least Paxton knows the difference between a taco and hot dog.

You still believe Paxton will win?

[Reagan]

1 hour ago, DCT said:

You still believe Paxton will win?

By an incumbent barely winning a primary, he’s already lost the run-off.  And Paxton will beat Talirico.  The more I learn about Talirico the more creepy it gets!

[Porter]

1 hour ago, DCT said:

You still believe Paxton will win?

IMO yes 

[DCT]

1 hour ago, Porter said:

IMO yes 

What do you like about his policies?

[Porter]

1 hour ago, DCT said:

What do you like about his policies?

He’s big on eliminating election fraud, illegal immigration and holding big Pharma accountable. 

[UT alum]

6 hours ago, Reagan said:

By an incumbent barely winning a primary, he’s already lost the run-off.  And Paxton will beat Talirico.  The more I learn about Talirico the more creepy it gets!

But, what are you learning, and more importantly from whom are you learning it from?

[UT alum]

Just now, UT alum said:

But, what are you learning, and more importantly from whom are you learning it from?

Butchered that sentence.

[Reagan]

1 hour ago, UT alum said:

But, what are you learning, and more importantly from whom are you learning it from?

From different sources.  I posted quite a few.

[Porter]

On 3/10/2026 at 8:57 AM, DCT said:

You still believe Paxton will win?

 

[tvc184]

On 3/10/2026 at 10:16 AM, Reagan said:

By an incumbent barely winning a primary, he’s already lost the run-off.  And Paxton will beat Talirico.  The more I learn about Talirico the more creepy it gets!

You started this thread almost a year ago. The article that you led off with has one poll showing Paxton up as much as 40% and crushing Cornyn. A day later I said not so fast.  It is hard to beat an incumbent. As an example I gave the gubernatorial race between Kay, Bailey Hutchison and Rick Perry. I think she was up about 25 points a year out, was a very popular US senator and had all the big names pushing for her. Perry beat her in the primary. Hutchison went from a 20+% point lead to a loss. 

A month later, you posted an article that said “Texas sized trouble for Cornyn”as a headlines and Paxton with a double digit lead  

A month later the article was Cornyn trounced by Paxton.

We could go on but I believe the point has been made.

All of the double digit leads completely went away and in truth, Cornyn beat Paxton in the primary. It was by only 1% but Paxton’s double digit lead (as much as 40%) evaporated and he edged into second place behind Cornyn. 

Now apparently, Paxton has already won.

Yesterday you posted a poll that showed Cornyn lost support (42% to 41%) from the primary so none of the undecided and all of the  votes for Hunt went to Paxton.

 The article that you posted now has Paxton with a 1% advantage if Cornyn got the Trump endorsement. The rumors are that Trump is about to endorse Cornyn. If that happens, by your article, it shows the race well within the margin of error.

 So for now, Cornyn has “already lost the run-off”. The bottom line is that nothing that you have posted for a year has been correct. Not only did Paxton not crush Cornyn, he lost to him in the primary. 

Yes it was by a mere percentage point but that’s a far cry from a 15% to 40% crushing loss by Cornyn.

Paxton may very well gain the needed votes to win. I doubt that Cornyn will lose votes as the article you posted suggests however. 

 Oddly, Paxton’s biggest ace in the hole could be the Democrat supporters not wishing to face Cornyn.

 

[AggiesAreWe]

5 minutes ago, tvc184 said:

You started this thread almost a year ago. The article that you led off with has one poll showing Paxton up as much as 40% and crushing Cornyn. A day later I said not so fast.  It is hard to beat an incumbent. As an example I gave the gubernatorial race between Kay, Bailey Hutchison and Rick Perry. I think she was up about 25 points a year out, was a very popular US senator and had all the big names pushing for her. Perry beat her in the primary. Hutchison went from a 20+% point lead to a loss. 

A month later, you posted an article that said “Texas sized trouble for Cornyn”as a headlines and Paxton with a double digit lead  

A month later the article was Cornyn trounced by Paxton.

We could go on but I believe the point has been made.

All of the double digit leads completely went away and in truth, Cornyn beat Paxton in the primary. It was by only 1% but Paxton’s double digit lead (as much as 40%) evaporated and he edged into second place behind Cornyn. 

Now apparently, Paxton has already won.

Yesterday you posted a poll that showed Cornyn lost support (42% to 41%) from the primary so none of the undecided and all of the  votes for Hunt went to Paxton.

 The article that you posted now has Paxton with a 1% advantage if Cornyn got the Trump endorsement. The rumors are that Trump is about to endorse Cornyn. If that happens, by your article, it shows the race well within the margin of error.

 So for now, Cornyn has “already lost the run-off”. The bottom line is that nothing that you have posted for a year has been correct. Not only did Paxton not crush Cornyn, he lost to him in the primary. 

Yes it was by a mere percentage point but that’s a far cry from a 15% to 40% crushing loss by Cornyn.

Paxton may very well gain the needed votes to win. I doubt that Cornyn will lose votes as the article you posted suggests however. 

 Oddly, Paxton’s biggest ace in the hole could be the Democrat supporters not wishing to face Cornyn.

 

Thanks for posting facts tvc.

[Reagan]

3 hours ago, tvc184 said:

You started this thread almost a year ago. The article that you led off with has one poll showing Paxton up as much as 40% and crushing Cornyn. A day later I said not so fast.  It is hard to beat an incumbent. As an example I gave the gubernatorial race between Kay, Bailey Hutchison and Rick Perry. I think she was up about 25 points a year out, was a very popular US senator and had all the big names pushing for her. Perry beat her in the primary. Hutchison went from a 20+% point lead to a loss. 

A month later, you posted an article that said “Texas sized trouble for Cornyn”as a headlines and Paxton with a double digit lead  

A month later the article was Cornyn trounced by Paxton.

We could go on but I believe the point has been made.

All of the double digit leads completely went away and in truth, Cornyn beat Paxton in the primary. It was by only 1% but Paxton’s double digit lead (as much as 40%) evaporated and he edged into second place behind Cornyn. 

Now apparently, Paxton has already won.

Yesterday you posted a poll that showed Cornyn lost support (42% to 41%) from the primary so none of the undecided and all of the  votes for Hunt went to Paxton.

 The article that you posted now has Paxton with a 1% advantage if Cornyn got the Trump endorsement. The rumors are that Trump is about to endorse Cornyn. If that happens, by your article, it shows the race well within the margin of error.

 So for now, Cornyn has “already lost the run-off”. The bottom line is that nothing that you have posted for a year has been correct. Not only did Paxton not crush Cornyn, he lost to him in the primary. 

Yes it was by a mere percentage point but that’s a far cry from a 15% to 40% crushing loss by Cornyn.

Paxton may very well gain the needed votes to win. I doubt that Cornyn will lose votes as the article you posted suggests however. 

 Oddly, Paxton’s biggest ace in the hole could be the Democrat supporters not wishing to face Cornyn.

 

As I see it, Cornyn lost when he barely beat Paxton in the primary.  Historically speaking, when this happens the incumbent usually loses the run-off!  I know you’re hoping Cornyn wins so don’t be too disappointed when he doesn’t!  😏

[Reagan]

2 hours ago, tvc184 said:

You started this thread almost a year ago. The article that you led off with has one poll showing Paxton up as much as 40% and crushing Cornyn. A day later I said not so fast.  It is hard to beat an incumbent. As an example I gave the gubernatorial race between Kay, Bailey Hutchison and Rick Perry. I think she was up about 25 points a year out, was a very popular US senator and had all the big names pushing for her. Perry beat her in the primary. Hutchison went from a 20+% point lead to a loss. 

A month later, you posted an article that said “Texas sized trouble for Cornyn”as a headlines and Paxton with a double digit lead  

A month later the article was Cornyn trounced by Paxton.

We could go on but I believe the point has been made.

All of the double digit leads completely went away and in truth, Cornyn beat Paxton in the primary. It was by only 1% but Paxton’s double digit lead (as much as 40%) evaporated and he edged into second place behind Cornyn. 

Now apparently, Paxton has already won.

Yesterday you posted a poll that showed Cornyn lost support (42% to 41%) from the primary so none of the undecided and all of the  votes for Hunt went to Paxton.

 The article that you posted now has Paxton with a 1% advantage if Cornyn got the Trump endorsement. The rumors are that Trump is about to endorse Cornyn. If that happens, by your article, it shows the race well within the margin of error.

 So for now, Cornyn has “already lost the run-off”. The bottom line is that nothing that you have posted for a year has been correct. Not only did Paxton not crush Cornyn, he lost to him in the primary. 

Yes it was by a mere percentage point but that’s a far cry from a 15% to 40% crushing loss by Cornyn.

Paxton may very well gain the needed votes to win. I doubt that Cornyn will lose votes as the article you posted suggests however. 

 Oddly, Paxton’s biggest ace in the hole could be the Democrat supporters not wishing to face Cornyn.

 

With or without Trump’s endorsement Paxton still leads.  It’s all about the end result, my friend!  

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

[TheMissingBand]

If there’s one thing I can’t stand, it’s posters making predictions that turn out to be wrong. 

[Porter]

11 minutes ago, TheMissingBand said:

If there’s one thing I can’t stand, it’s posters making predictions that turn out to be wrong. 

Yeah… CB you really missed BIG on Trump getting re elected. 😂

Remember….he was a unelectable candidate.😂

[Reagan]

58 minutes ago, Reagan said:

With or without Trump’s endorsement Paxton still leads.  It’s all about the end result, my friend!  

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

I can see Trump not endorsing anyone after seeing this poll that shows Paxton winning!  I’m fairly confident this is the win Trump wants!

[Reagan]

56 minutes ago, TheMissingBand said:

If there’s one thing I can’t stand, it’s posters making predictions that turn out to be wrong. 

Just a little detour, my friend!  

[tvc184]

2 hours ago, Reagan said:

As I see it, Cornyn lost when he barely beat Paxton in the primary.  Historically speaking, when this happens the incumbent usually loses the run-off!  I know you’re hoping Cornyn wins so don’t be too disappointed when he doesn’t!  😏

 

2 hours ago, Reagan said:

With or without Trump’s endorsement Paxton still leads.  It’s all about the end result, my friend!  

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Neither of your follow ups addressed my comment.

I made no prediction nor refuted any of the current polls posted this thread.

I only noted that you apparently scour the internet trying to find another person’s comment that agrees with your own. You can post whatever but none of the claimed blowout of Cornyn has happened. Zero…..

So yet again you are referring to someone else’s opinion or poll to back up your beliefs. It is having an opinion and then trying to find a comment that backs up your pre-determined beliefs. That’s okay.

I will refer back to my comment a year ago that said it is tough to beat an incumbent no matter what the polls say. To date I have been correct…. you haven’t, not even once. Don’t count your chickens before they hatch.

It is like a guy who predicts who will be in the Super Bowl and for 20 years has been wrong every time. Then after two decades of failure, his prediction is correct and he says, “See, I told you!!”.

My only prediction to date is that it is tough to beat an incumbent. I gave the example of KBH whose early poll showed that she would annihilate Perry. I am fairly certain that anyone reading this thread would agree that Cornyn to date has been a tough opponent.

Let me guess, you will again search the internet high and low to find another poll that has nothing to do with this comment. 
😎

And for a side note, I voted early and for Paxton. I don’t think he will be the best choice to beat the Democrats. He carries too much baggage. I don’t believe politically slanted polls however.

 I also believe that the Democrats might come out to support Paxton in order to eliminate Cornyn. Anyone who didn’t vote in the Democrat primary is eligible to vote in the runoff. 

[AggiesAreWe]

51 minutes ago, tvc184 said:

 

Neither of your follow ups addressed my comment.

I made no prediction nor refuted any of the current polls posted this thread.

I only noted that you apparently scour the internet trying to find another person’s comment that agrees with your own. You can post whatever but none of the claimed blowout of Cornyn has happened. Zero…..

So yet again you are referring to someone else’s opinion or poll to back up your beliefs. It is having an opinion and then trying to find a comment that backs up your pre-determined beliefs. That’s okay.

I will refer back to my comment a year ago that said it is tough to beat an incumbent no matter what the polls say. To date I have been correct…. you haven’t, not even once. Don’t count your chickens before they hatch.

It is like a guy who predicts who will be in the Super Bowl and for 20 years has been wrong every time. Then after two decades of failure, his prediction is correct and he says, “See, I told you!!”.

My only prediction to date is that it is tough to beat an incumbent. I gave the example of KBH whose early poll showed that she would annihilate Perry. I am fairly certain that anyone reading this thread would agree that Cornyn to date has been a tough opponent.

Let me guess, you will again search the internet high and low to find another poll that has nothing to do with this comment. 
😎

And for a side note, I voted early and for Paxton. I don’t think he will be the best choice to beat the Democrats. He carries too much baggage. I don’t believe politically slanted polls however.

 I also believe that the Democrats might come out to support Paxton in order to eliminate Cornyn. Anyone who didn’t vote in the Democrat primary is eligible to vote in the runoff. 

Be careful tvc, you may come off sounding too reasonable.

Also, Reagan may claim he is being harassed by a moderator.

[TheMissingBand]

6 hours ago, tvc184 said:

 I also believe that the Democrats might come out to support Paxton in order to eliminate Cornyn. Anyone who didn’t vote in the Democrat primary is eligible to vote in the runoff. 

 

 

I thought that the crossover could be a big deal, except the Dem turnout was so great in their primary. The type of voter who would be willing to crossover during the runoff definitely voted in the D primary, so I don’t think crossover votes will “taint” the runoff. 
 

I also think that Hunt voters wanted change, but didn’t want it badly enough to vote for Paxton in the primary, even though he stood a much better chance of beating Cornyn.  I think the Hunt voters will likely stay home or go Cornyn.  
 

My position has changed on this one, somewhat.  I thought it would go Paxton, then Paxton in a runoff.  I like Cornyn’s chances a lot better since he finished decisively first in the primary.  But there’s no doubt that a Trump endorsement could really motivate the less sophisticated of our MAGA brethren to vote either way.  Until then, I think it’s Cornyn’s race to lose.  
 

I’ve read enough articles to decide that Paxton is likely as corrupt as they come.  It’s time to stop nominating the biggest jerks simply because they’re the biggest jerk. 

[Porter]

32 minutes ago, TheMissingBand said:

I thought that the crossover could be a big deal, except the Dem turnout was so great in their primary. The type of voter who would be willing to crossover during the runoff definitely voted in the D primary, so I don’t think crossover votes will “taint” the runoff. 
 

I also think that Hunt voters wanted change, but didn’t want it badly enough to vote for Paxton in the primary, even though he stood a much better chance of beating Cornyn.  I think the Hunt voters will likely stay home or go Cornyn.  
 

My position has changed on this one, somewhat.  I thought it would go Paxton, then Paxton in a runoff.  I like Cornyn’s chances a lot better since he finished decisively first in the primary.  But there’s no doubt that a Trump endorsement could really motivate the less sophisticated of our MAGA brethren to vote either way.  Until then, I think it’s Cornyn’s race to lose.  
 

I’ve read enough articles to decide that Paxton is likely as corrupt as they come.  It’s time to stop nominating the biggest jerks simply because they’re the biggest jerk. 

This is one of the main reasons they’ve been trying to take out Paxton. I know you believe we have the most secure elections in the world. 😂

Fix our corrupt elections or our country goes down the toilet. It’s that simple. 
 

And CB says…..Lol

 

[TheMissingBand]

Simply put, our elections aren’t rigged.  That’s the reason that no one can ever find evidence of widespread election fraud. Never. Not even once.  
 

Now, the losing side likes to cry out “they cheated” whenever they lose.  You have to look no further than the SOTU when the Crybaby-in-Chief stated “The democrats can’t win an election unless they cheat” and all of the lesser-understanding voters didn’t disagree.  
 

Same thing from Jasmine Crockett earlier this month. “I was cheated.” No, you lost. 
 

I get it you-believe that out elections aren’t fair… they’re rigged. Does that mean that Donald Trump legitimately won in 16? “YES!!!”  Do you believe that he legitimately lost in 20? “No, they CHEATED!” Ok, so did Donald Trump actually win in 2024? “Yes! The People have Spoken!” So the system works, right? “No! It’s broken! We need people like Ken Paxton to save us from a broken election system!” Losers cry “cheating,” and they known what’s about to happen in November.

 

Whenever somebody is trying to stop people  from voting, you can be assured that person will be a white republican, without fail.  ALWAYS.