Ken Paxton Would Crush RINO Cornyn in Texas Senate Primary, Data Confirms.

[mat]

 

[Reagan]

 

 

[Reagan]

 

This is fairly spot on.  Like i said before -- Cornyn lost the run-off when he barely won the primary.  Usually bad for incumbents when this happens!

[DCT]

On 3/4/2026 at 6:16 PM, Porter said:

Yeah….. the Angelic Democrat Party can’t even define what a woman is. Come on CB!

At least Paxton knows the difference between a taco and hot dog.

You still believe Paxton will win?

[Reagan]

1 hour ago, DCT said:

You still believe Paxton will win?

By an incumbent barely winning a primary, he’s already lost the run-off.  And Paxton will beat Talirico.  The more I learn about Talirico the more creepy it gets!

[Porter]

1 hour ago, DCT said:

You still believe Paxton will win?

IMO yes 

[DCT]

1 hour ago, Porter said:

IMO yes 

What do you like about his policies?

[Porter]

1 hour ago, DCT said:

What do you like about his policies?

He’s big on eliminating election fraud, illegal immigration and holding big Pharma accountable. 

[UT alum]

6 hours ago, Reagan said:

By an incumbent barely winning a primary, he’s already lost the run-off.  And Paxton will beat Talirico.  The more I learn about Talirico the more creepy it gets!

But, what are you learning, and more importantly from whom are you learning it from?

[UT alum]

Just now, UT alum said:

But, what are you learning, and more importantly from whom are you learning it from?

Butchered that sentence.

[Reagan]

1 hour ago, UT alum said:

But, what are you learning, and more importantly from whom are you learning it from?

From different sources.  I posted quite a few.

[Porter]

On 3/10/2026 at 8:57 AM, DCT said:

You still believe Paxton will win?

 

[tvc184]

On 3/10/2026 at 10:16 AM, Reagan said:

By an incumbent barely winning a primary, he’s already lost the run-off.  And Paxton will beat Talirico.  The more I learn about Talirico the more creepy it gets!

You started this thread almost a year ago. The article that you led off with has one poll showing Paxton up as much as 40% and crushing Cornyn. A day later I said not so fast.  It is hard to beat an incumbent. As an example I gave the gubernatorial race between Kay, Bailey Hutchison and Rick Perry. I think she was up about 25 points a year out, was a very popular US senator and had all the big names pushing for her. Perry beat her in the primary. Hutchison went from a 20+% point lead to a loss. 

A month later, you posted an article that said “Texas sized trouble for Cornyn”as a headlines and Paxton with a double digit lead  

A month later the article was Cornyn trounced by Paxton.

We could go on but I believe the point has been made.

All of the double digit leads completely went away and in truth, Cornyn beat Paxton in the primary. It was by only 1% but Paxton’s double digit lead (as much as 40%) evaporated and he edged into second place behind Cornyn. 

Now apparently, Paxton has already won.

Yesterday you posted a poll that showed Cornyn lost support (42% to 41%) from the primary so none of the undecided and all of the  votes for Hunt went to Paxton.

 The article that you posted now has Paxton with a 1% advantage if Cornyn got the Trump endorsement. The rumors are that Trump is about to endorse Cornyn. If that happens, by your article, it shows the race well within the margin of error.

 So for now, Cornyn has “already lost the run-off”. The bottom line is that nothing that you have posted for a year has been correct. Not only did Paxton not crush Cornyn, he lost to him in the primary. 

Yes it was by a mere percentage point but that’s a far cry from a 15% to 40% crushing loss by Cornyn.

Paxton may very well gain the needed votes to win. I doubt that Cornyn will lose votes as the article you posted suggests however. 

 Oddly, Paxton’s biggest ace in the hole could be the Democrat supporters not wishing to face Cornyn.

 

[AggiesAreWe]

5 minutes ago, tvc184 said:

You started this thread almost a year ago. The article that you led off with has one poll showing Paxton up as much as 40% and crushing Cornyn. A day later I said not so fast.  It is hard to beat an incumbent. As an example I gave the gubernatorial race between Kay, Bailey Hutchison and Rick Perry. I think she was up about 25 points a year out, was a very popular US senator and had all the big names pushing for her. Perry beat her in the primary. Hutchison went from a 20+% point lead to a loss. 

A month later, you posted an article that said “Texas sized trouble for Cornyn”as a headlines and Paxton with a double digit lead  

A month later the article was Cornyn trounced by Paxton.

We could go on but I believe the point has been made.

All of the double digit leads completely went away and in truth, Cornyn beat Paxton in the primary. It was by only 1% but Paxton’s double digit lead (as much as 40%) evaporated and he edged into second place behind Cornyn. 

Now apparently, Paxton has already won.

Yesterday you posted a poll that showed Cornyn lost support (42% to 41%) from the primary so none of the undecided and all of the  votes for Hunt went to Paxton.

 The article that you posted now has Paxton with a 1% advantage if Cornyn got the Trump endorsement. The rumors are that Trump is about to endorse Cornyn. If that happens, by your article, it shows the race well within the margin of error.

 So for now, Cornyn has “already lost the run-off”. The bottom line is that nothing that you have posted for a year has been correct. Not only did Paxton not crush Cornyn, he lost to him in the primary. 

Yes it was by a mere percentage point but that’s a far cry from a 15% to 40% crushing loss by Cornyn.

Paxton may very well gain the needed votes to win. I doubt that Cornyn will lose votes as the article you posted suggests however. 

 Oddly, Paxton’s biggest ace in the hole could be the Democrat supporters not wishing to face Cornyn.

 

Thanks for posting facts tvc.

[Reagan]

3 hours ago, tvc184 said:

You started this thread almost a year ago. The article that you led off with has one poll showing Paxton up as much as 40% and crushing Cornyn. A day later I said not so fast.  It is hard to beat an incumbent. As an example I gave the gubernatorial race between Kay, Bailey Hutchison and Rick Perry. I think she was up about 25 points a year out, was a very popular US senator and had all the big names pushing for her. Perry beat her in the primary. Hutchison went from a 20+% point lead to a loss. 

A month later, you posted an article that said “Texas sized trouble for Cornyn”as a headlines and Paxton with a double digit lead  

A month later the article was Cornyn trounced by Paxton.

We could go on but I believe the point has been made.

All of the double digit leads completely went away and in truth, Cornyn beat Paxton in the primary. It was by only 1% but Paxton’s double digit lead (as much as 40%) evaporated and he edged into second place behind Cornyn. 

Now apparently, Paxton has already won.

Yesterday you posted a poll that showed Cornyn lost support (42% to 41%) from the primary so none of the undecided and all of the  votes for Hunt went to Paxton.

 The article that you posted now has Paxton with a 1% advantage if Cornyn got the Trump endorsement. The rumors are that Trump is about to endorse Cornyn. If that happens, by your article, it shows the race well within the margin of error.

 So for now, Cornyn has “already lost the run-off”. The bottom line is that nothing that you have posted for a year has been correct. Not only did Paxton not crush Cornyn, he lost to him in the primary. 

Yes it was by a mere percentage point but that’s a far cry from a 15% to 40% crushing loss by Cornyn.

Paxton may very well gain the needed votes to win. I doubt that Cornyn will lose votes as the article you posted suggests however. 

 Oddly, Paxton’s biggest ace in the hole could be the Democrat supporters not wishing to face Cornyn.

 

As I see it, Cornyn lost when he barely beat Paxton in the primary.  Historically speaking, when this happens the incumbent usually loses the run-off!  I know you’re hoping Cornyn wins so don’t be too disappointed when he doesn’t!  😏

[Reagan]

2 hours ago, tvc184 said:

You started this thread almost a year ago. The article that you led off with has one poll showing Paxton up as much as 40% and crushing Cornyn. A day later I said not so fast.  It is hard to beat an incumbent. As an example I gave the gubernatorial race between Kay, Bailey Hutchison and Rick Perry. I think she was up about 25 points a year out, was a very popular US senator and had all the big names pushing for her. Perry beat her in the primary. Hutchison went from a 20+% point lead to a loss. 

A month later, you posted an article that said “Texas sized trouble for Cornyn”as a headlines and Paxton with a double digit lead  

A month later the article was Cornyn trounced by Paxton.

We could go on but I believe the point has been made.

All of the double digit leads completely went away and in truth, Cornyn beat Paxton in the primary. It was by only 1% but Paxton’s double digit lead (as much as 40%) evaporated and he edged into second place behind Cornyn. 

Now apparently, Paxton has already won.

Yesterday you posted a poll that showed Cornyn lost support (42% to 41%) from the primary so none of the undecided and all of the  votes for Hunt went to Paxton.

 The article that you posted now has Paxton with a 1% advantage if Cornyn got the Trump endorsement. The rumors are that Trump is about to endorse Cornyn. If that happens, by your article, it shows the race well within the margin of error.

 So for now, Cornyn has “already lost the run-off”. The bottom line is that nothing that you have posted for a year has been correct. Not only did Paxton not crush Cornyn, he lost to him in the primary. 

Yes it was by a mere percentage point but that’s a far cry from a 15% to 40% crushing loss by Cornyn.

Paxton may very well gain the needed votes to win. I doubt that Cornyn will lose votes as the article you posted suggests however. 

 Oddly, Paxton’s biggest ace in the hole could be the Democrat supporters not wishing to face Cornyn.

 

With or without Trump’s endorsement Paxton still leads.  It’s all about the end result, my friend!  

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

[TheMissingBand]

If there’s one thing I can’t stand, it’s posters making predictions that turn out to be wrong. 

[Porter]

11 minutes ago, TheMissingBand said:

If there’s one thing I can’t stand, it’s posters making predictions that turn out to be wrong. 

Yeah… CB you really missed BIG on Trump getting re elected. 😂

Remember….he was a unelectable candidate.😂

[Reagan]

58 minutes ago, Reagan said:

With or without Trump’s endorsement Paxton still leads.  It’s all about the end result, my friend!  

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

I can see Trump not endorsing anyone after seeing this poll that shows Paxton winning!  I’m fairly confident this is the win Trump wants!

[Reagan]

56 minutes ago, TheMissingBand said:

If there’s one thing I can’t stand, it’s posters making predictions that turn out to be wrong. 

Just a little detour, my friend!