Jump to content

Who wins?  

110 members have voted

  1. 1. Who wins?

    • Port Neches-Groves
    • South Oak Cliff

This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 12/16/2023 at 05:00 PM

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 12/18/2023 at 10:38 PM, Matthew328 said:

I'm not the world's biggest fan of open enrollment myself, but we can thank the Texas legislature for that along with charter schools et al..it is what it is and the UIL does the best they can with the resources alloted. The kids that play for SOC are all eligible under UIL rules, the open enrollment/recruiting conversation to me is just as moot IMO as SOC people complaining about some close calls that didnt go their way

Expand  

I’m not arguing they aren’t eligible. I’d just like to understand why we don’t recruit as openly as they do. Why can’t png just declare itself and open enrollment school and build a super team? 

Posted
  On 12/17/2023 at 8:02 PM, Rez Ipsa said:

I think there should be a rule on that. It’s evidencing an intention to interfere with the referee’s administration of the game. It’s saying, “We intend to cheat and we are taking action to obstruct the referees’ ability to observe and punish our cheating.” 

Expand  

I mean you cant really do that because what if the other team wears white or has the same team colors as you? Refs dont need to be fashion police IMO

Posted
  On 12/18/2023 at 10:49 PM, Matthew328 said:

Because thats an ISD decision, PNG could tomorrow go open enrollment if they choose to. 

Expand  

There are a lot more open enrollment ISDs than you think that are out there as well....Dallas ISD is far from unique in that regard

I do believe TX should consider doing like Louisiana and creating classifications and seperating out open enrollment ISD's vs non-open enrollment ISD's 

Posted
  On 12/18/2023 at 10:48 PM, Matthew328 said:

I mean you cant really do that because what if the other team wears white or has the same team colors as you? Refs dont need to be fashion police IMO

Expand  

I’d be ok with it happening because of the incidental fact that two teams have similar or same colors. It’s more fishy when it’s obviously not your colors and the deliberate choice is based on what the other team is wearing. It’s purposeful interference with the referees. The only reason to do it is if you’re planning to hold AND to obstruct the refs’ view of the penalty. If that’s ok, why not also shine a light in the refs’ eyes so they can’t see? (An admittedly more extreme example, but both are in the same spirit of interference with the administration of the game). 

Posted
  On 12/18/2023 at 10:54 PM, Matthew328 said:

There are a lot more open enrollment ISDs than you think that are out there as well....Dallas ISD is far from unique in that regard

I do believe TX should consider doing like Louisiana and creating classifications and seperating out open enrollment ISD's vs non-open enrollment ISD's 

Expand  

I think Vidor is open enrollment , proving it’s not a magic button for being world beaters. 

Posted

For what it's worth, PN-GISD briefly considered becoming an open enrollment district circa 2010 for financial reasons. The community adamantly opposed the idea, and I believe it still would. Personally, I'm not a fan of the idea, either.

Posted
  On 12/18/2023 at 10:54 PM, Matthew328 said:

There are a lot more open enrollment ISDs than you think that are out there as well....Dallas ISD is far from unique in that regard

I do believe TX should consider doing like Louisiana and creating classifications and seperating out open enrollment ISD's vs non-open enrollment ISD's 

Expand  

I guess refresh my memory on the term it’s been a while…. But A “Magnet” School wasn’t there a rule on that they have to compete a higher level or something? Is that still a thing or no? I’m trying to refresh my memory on it all

Posted
  On 12/19/2023 at 12:02 AM, navydawg31 said:

I guess refresh my memory on the term it’s been a while…. But A “Magnet” School wasn’t there a rule on that they have to compete a higher level or something? Is that still a thing or no? I’m trying to refresh my memory on it all

Expand  

Beaumont Central was a magnet school FWIW. I think Ozen was too. 🤷🏾‍♂️

Posted
  On 12/19/2023 at 12:43 AM, navydawg31 said:

Yeah I remember they was, but some loophole where they didn’t have to go up or something. There was a long thread on that years ago about it on here… willing to bet it hit over 30 pages. 

Expand  

Probably before a couple server crashes that deleted some threads, wish we could get those back. 

Posted
  On 12/18/2023 at 10:55 PM, Rez Ipsa said:

I’d be ok with it happening because of the incidental fact that two teams have similar or same colors. It’s more fishy when it’s obviously not your colors and the deliberate choice is based on what the other team is wearing. It’s purposeful interference with the referees. The only reason to do it is if you’re planning to hold AND to obstruct the refs’ view of the penalty. If that’s ok, why not also shine a light in the refs’ eyes so they can’t see? (An admittedly more extreme example, but both are in the same spirit of interference with the administration of the game). 

Expand  

Kids do it for instagram etc....its not a competitive thing its a fashion/disrespect thing that started in peewee ball and made its way to HS

Posted
  On 12/19/2023 at 12:02 AM, navydawg31 said:

I guess refresh my memory on the term it’s been a while…. But A “Magnet” School wasn’t there a rule on that they have to compete a higher level or something? Is that still a thing or no? I’m trying to refresh my memory on it all

Expand  

That used to be a rule but I dont believe it is any longer

Posted
  On 12/19/2023 at 4:04 AM, PhatMack19 said:

 

This is the hidden content, please

Expand  

This is incredible. They had every opportunity to look at who was on the ref crew, and approved that crew anyway. How can there have been a lack of transparency when the ref bios were public information?
 

Also, that ref only even threw one flag the whole game, and that wasn’t the call they’re complaining about. That ref has no children attending PNG, which is the only violation possible. Wasn’t the ref crew from the Dallas area last year?
 

Not to mention, this sends the worst possible message to the students : That there’s no such thing as graceful defeat, that every disappointment must be appealed, that every failure is a robbery instead of just a failure.  

Posted
  On 12/19/2023 at 4:23 AM, Rez Ipsa said:

This is incredible. They had every opportunity to look at who was on the ref crew, and approved that crew anyway. How can there have been a lack of transparency when the ref bios were public information?
 

Also, that ref only even threw one flag the whole game, and that wasn’t the call they’re complaining about. That ref has no children attending PNG, which is the only violation possible. Wasn’t the ref crew from the Dallas area last year?
 

Not to mention, this sends the worst possible message to the students : That there’s no such thing as graceful defeat, that every disappointment must be appealed, that every failure is a robbery instead of just a failure.  

Expand  

The referee crew last year was a Fort Worth crew...SOC uses Dallas

Contrary to popular belief Fort Worth is its own thing

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Member Statistics

    46,278
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ted Lasso
    Newest Member
    Ted Lasso
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...