Jump to content

Hardin-Jefferson 51 vs. Silsbee 62/FINAL


Recommended Posts

Just now, TrojanWarrior08 said:

Tigers were shooting unnecessary 3s in the last few seconds of the half but I'm not surprised that this one is close so far.

I’m surprised…. I just feel like these teams shouldn’t be in a close game… May not after the second half

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BBfan061 said:

I’m surprised…. I just feel like these teams shouldn’t be in a close game… May not after the second half

I’m not surprised.  I will be surprised if the tigers don’t wear them down in the second half and pull away some.  It takes a lot of energy breaking the press every possession, and the tigers are so deep and can keep throwing in fresh talent 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TrojanWarrior08 said:

Tigers were shooting unnecessary 3's in the last few seconds of the half but I'm not surprised that this one is close so far.

It's the Silsbee way. It'll drive you nuts sometimes though. Less so when a few of them start falling.

If you're HJ, you'd better do everything you can to keep Silsbee from going up 10+ in the 3rd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tigers94 said:

It's the Silsbee way. It'll drive you nuts sometimes though. Less so when a few of them start falling.

If you're HJ, you'd better do everything you can to keep Silsbee from going up 10+ in the 3rd.

They just need to get their feet set and not rush the process of shooting it especially if you're shooting from that range.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Tigers94 said:

It's the Silsbee way. It'll drive you nuts sometimes though. Less so when a few of them start falling.

If you're HJ, you'd better do everything you can to keep Silsbee from going up 10+ in the 3rd.

Yup.  Keep it at 4-6 and give yourself a chance in the 4th

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • WOSdrummer99 changed the title to Hardin-Jefferson 51 vs. Silsbee 62/FINAL

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,935
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Diboll - 1  Central Heights- 0
    • Just to expound a little further, so you are not confused...I, along with so many others, are laughing at your desperation. You are working overtime, nay, double even triple time, trying to convince normal people Trump was bad for the country. His policies provided for peace all over the world, low gas prices, low food prices, energy independence, closed border, low inflation, record low unemployment, and on and on and on. You try to counter this narrative by saying unemployment skyrocketed on his watch. You said this knowing full well the unemployment rate went up due to Covid. Your narrative is just so laughable, to the point of side-splitting hilarity. Who would even attempt this asinine narrative? Now, even if you get past the utter stupidity of that MSNBC talking point, you provide another side-splitting hilarious tidbit of evidence to back your claim of Trump being bad for the country. You actually tried to tie the stock market going down to Trump...after Covid. You, I, and everybody else knows the stock market was flourishing under Trump...until Covid hit. This argument is just as bad as the other one. Again, who would even attempt this narrative? The only thing you could remotely muster that had any sliver of truthfulness, is that spending increased. Sure, Trump rebuilt the military and gave them a deserved raise. But he also had to shut down the government due to Democrats demanding an even more, and very detrimental, increase in spending. And in a true extremely exaggerated fashion, you proclaim that spending "skyrocketed". Again, who would even attempt this narrative? I think I can smell the desperation. Do you have any other whoppers to contribute?
    • He was injured but has returned and he decided not to play baseball this year.
    • There's some truth to that.......some.
    • The AD's job is to win in football. Everything else is window dressing. If the football team is winning the rest can go up in smoke. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...