Jump to content

Question about a rule


WOSdrummer99

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, WOSdrummer99 said:

Fg attempt blocked but caught by kicking team. Then ran into end zone by kicking team. No TD. Is this correct?

At first i thought not. But why can the other team advance the ball and possibly score? Maybe it's that a kicked ball cannot be advanced by the kicking team. Is that also true on a kickoff?

I believe that’s correct. The kicking team can’t advance the ball on FGs or kickoff 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it is blocked and never crosses the line of scrimmage either team can advance the ball. 
 

now if it is blocked but passes the line of scrimmage only the defense can advance the ball, if it’s an extra point the offense can pick the ball up but it’s then a dead ball and the extra point is no good, if it is a field goal attempt and it is blocked but passes the line of scrimmage it is then considered a punt and the kicking team can down the ball wherever they touch it at. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, EAGLEFOREVER said:

Kicking team can’t advance an onside kick

If the receiving team catches the onside kick and starts and runs and fumble the ball it can be advanced. Muff rule, just like a dropped punt cannot be advanced neither can a onside kick unless the receiving team run and control the ball then fumbles.   
A few years back I think it was Central playing PN-G and Central scored and went up by 2points and PN-G blocked the xtra point and run it back for 2points and tied the game. PN-G won in OT.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, purpleeagle said:

If the receiving team catches the onside kick and starts and runs and fumble the ball it can be advanced. Muff rule, just like a dropped punt cannot be advanced neither can a onside kick unless the receiving team run and control the ball then fumbles.   
A few years back I think it was Central playing PN-G and Central scored and went up by 2points and PN-G blocked the xtra point and run it back for 2points and tied the game. PN-G won in OT.

 

I remember with in the late 80's or early 90's Lumberton set up to kick a pat to go 1 point ahead of WOS for our first ever win against them. Needless to say they blocked the PAT and ran it back for 2 points with no time left. That sucked....😒

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, raideroldtimer said:

I remember with in the late 80's or early 90's Lumberton set up to kick a pat to go 1 point ahead of WOS for our first ever win against them. Needless to say they blocked the PAT and ran it back for 2 points with no time left. That sucked....😒

Looking at our history. Maybe that was the last time we played in 2003. WOS 14-7 Probably a blocked FG we ran back for a TD. Heartbreak

Also the last time we missed the playoffs. We lost to Nederland and Central.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m under the impression that once it leaves the kickers foot, it’s a change of possession.   Kicking team can’t recover, and retain possession, or advance the ball.

Once it crosses the LOS, and if the defensive team touches, and muffs the ball, it can be recovered by the kicking team, but not advanced.

If the defensive team recovers the ball, advances the ball, then fumbles, then the kicking team could recover and advance the ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,978
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined


  • Posts

    • What the writer stated wrt crossover votes in the primary/runoff: "Covey and his supporters Paxton and Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick said Phelan only won because Democrats crossed over to vote in the Republican Primary for him. Paxton said Covey’s campaign identified “at least” 1,442 Democrats who voted early in Jefferson County in the primary runoff. Texas does not have party registration, but a voter’s primary voting history is public. The Covey campaign has not released its methodology behind its claim, but  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  by The Texan news website found that 9% of Republican voters in the March District 21 primary had voted in one of the previous four Democratic primaries. However, only 5% of that group had voted in all four previous Democratic primaries. What Phelan’s opponents did not mention is historically Democratic Jefferson County is undergoing a political transition towards the Republican party — the county judge switched his affiliation to the GOP in 2017 — so many residents have a mixed primary voting history. And Phelan’s allies in the House dismissed the idea that liberals swung the election. "I knocked on doors, hundreds and hundreds of doors, made calls for Dade,” Republican Rep. Jeff Leach, R-Plano, said on Mark Davis’ radio program Wednesday. “I did not speak to a single Democrat down here in HD21. Not a single one." "  
    • He's with it enough to do what he's told, beginning day 1 when he signed the order to revoke the Keystone Pipeline project.  But more recently, he's protecting the DOJ, as well as himself ...  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • Most 75-80 year Olds have some type of cognitive impairment. If you are asking if Biden has dementia then my answer is no. That is a Republican talking point. If you all think he has dementia what type do you think he has?
    • A lot better showing from the Ags tonight!   Bring on Oregon 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...