Jump to content

My rankings for Jan. 31


Recommended Posts

Here are my rankings for Jan. 31

6A/5A/4A

1. Beaumont United

2. Atascocita

3. Humble Summer Creek

4. Hardin-Jefferson

5. Huffman-Hargrave

6. Goose Creek Memorial

7. Crosby

8. Manvel

9. Kingwood Park

10. Lumberton

11. Silsbee

12. Beaumont West Brook

13. Carthage

14. Nederland

15. Hamshire-Fannett

others: Montgomery Lake Creek, Bridge City, New Caney, La Porte, Lufkin Hudson, CE King, Barbers Hill, Shepherd

 

3A/2A/1A/Private

1. East Chambers

2. New Waverly

3. Diboll

4. Tenaha

5. Gary

6. Coldspring-Oakhurst

7. Buna

8. Nacogdoches Central Heights

9. Pineland West Sabine

10. Dallardsville Big Sandy

11. Huntington

12. Deweyville

13. Anahuac

14. Zavalla

15. Timpson

others: Chireno, Beaumont Legacy, Shelbyville, Tarkington, Newton, Sabine Pass

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • WOSgrad changed the title to My rankings for Jan. 31
58 minutes ago, Gtj007 said:

I’m curious what criteria you use for your rankings.  I see Nederland at 14 but they have beat 4 teams raked ahead of them. (HJ, Lumberton, Crosby and West Brook)

It's a very complicated mathematical equation. I could explain it to you, but then I would have to kill you.

On a serious note, I probably should have them higher. That loss at home to BH looks bad but I wouldn't have a problem with Ned being 11 or so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m not curious enough to die...lol.  But, Nederland has 3 total losses with 2 of them being to #2 state ranked United!!   I get that Nederland lost to BH at home...but Crosby and Lumberton (both ranked higher) lost to Nederland at home.  And Silsbee, they’re 10-10 😲

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Gtj007 said:

I’m not curious enough to die...lol.  But, Nederland has 3 total losses with 2 of them being to #2 state ranked United!!   I get that Nederland lost to BH at home...but Crosby and Lumberton (both ranked higher) lost to Nederland at home.  And Silsbee, they’re 10-10 😲

Wins and losses early in the season (particularly when some don't have a full squad due to football, and in Silsbee's case, 2 losses because the whole varsity was quarantined) doesn't necessarily play into rankings in the next to last week of the regular season.

Again, I probably should have Nederland higher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Gtj007 said:

I’m not curious enough to die...lol.  But, Nederland has 3 total losses with 2 of them being to #2 state ranked United!!   I get that Nederland lost to BH at home...but Crosby and Lumberton (both ranked higher) lost to Nederland at home.  And Silsbee, they’re 10-10 😲

Isn’t Nederland a higher classification than Lumberton?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Sure.  You reassign an employee and they leave voluntarily instead of being fired and being open to litigation.  The outcome is the same, but you are making my point.  The superintendent and AD and principal are all empowered to make personnel decisions.  Instead of accepting the decision made, you talk about lawyering up, no one else was reprimanded, railroad job.  I am old enough to remember when high school sports taught life lessons...accountability being chief among them.
    • I know absolutely nothing about the situation, but I do know head coaches of sports other than the AD have actual teaching assignments, and I know from my wife having worked in the sped department of multiple schools that it’s not uncommon at all for coaches to shirk those duties.  It could very well be that this was the case at BC.  Or not, I don’t know.  Just bringing this up to point out the fact that, although many coaches only want to worry about coaching, they generally have several other responsibilities at the school.  some of them neglect or ignore these duties entirely.  If he’s been written up for other issues before, it’s a dumb argument to say “he was punished for this and others were not”.  If he had a pile of write ups in his file and they did not then it makes sense that the punishments were different.  
    • He wasn’t fired, he was reassigned and people get reassigned all the time. If he was actually fired, then you would have a point, but he wasn’t fired. Based on the information presented here no way this would stand if they fired him and he lawyered up. 
    • I heard the assistant was going to get this job and assume it was referring to the old Vidor coach, Nate Smith.  I always thought he did more with less at Vidor and can't help but think he shares some responsibility in Vidor's recent success. 
    • Classic Bridge City.  Always someone else's fault, refs/umpires cheated, AD with an agenda, yada, yada, yada.  As far as I can tell it's damn near impossible to get fired at these schools so when someone does get fired, it's usually something.  Drama at Bridge City is a constant.  The guy did a good job coaching basketball and I'm sure he'll continue that somewhere else.  Time to move on.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...