Jump to content

Two Articles Of Impeachment Is All The Dims Could Come Up With?!


Reagan

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, stevenash said:

Nice try, but old sayings have zero meaning.  If I hear from several people that don't like you that you are a pedophile, should I accept that because more than one made the claim and because they "heard it from a friend of a friend" or from a "confidential" whistleblower?

He speaks lies that I hear. How can that be more direct?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, UT alum said:

He speaks lies that I hear. How can that be more direct?

And these lies that you hear, please give me two or three of the most consequential lies you have heard personally that need absolutely no interpretation but the statements themselves.  Yes, I am interested in CONSEQUENTIAL IRREFUTABLE OUTRIGHT INTENTIONAL  lies..  Additionally, if you have heard them, every other person in this country heard them as well.   Is half the country wrong and you are definitely right?  Or are these "lies" subject to interpretation, conclusions, and judgement of same that are colored by personal like/dislike?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, stevenash said:

And these lies that you hear, please give me two or three of the most consequential lies you have heard personally that need absolutely no interpretation but the statements themselves.  Yes, I am interested in CONSEQUENTIAL IRREFUTABLE OUTRIGHT INTENTIONAL  lies..  Additionally, if you have heard them, every other person in this country heard them as well.   Is half the country wrong and you are definitely right?  Or are these "lies" subject to interpretation, conclusions, and judgement of same that are colored by personal like/dislike?  

You know how it is, Nash, make America great again actually means we’re returning to Jim Crow laws.

That state Democrats put in place, by the way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, stevenash said:

And these lies that you hear, please give me two or three of the most consequential lies you have heard personally that need absolutely no interpretation but the statements themselves.  Yes, I am interested in CONSEQUENTIAL IRREFUTABLE OUTRIGHT INTENTIONAL  lies..  Additionally, if you have heard them, every other person in this country heard them as well.   Is half the country wrong and you are definitely right?  Or are these "lies" subject to interpretation, conclusions, and judgement of same that are colored by personal like/dislike?  

Mexico will pay for the wall. North Korea just announced plans to denuclearize. US steel just announced they are building six new steel mills. Kurds are much safer now. China will pay tariffs, not us. Democrats oppose any effort to secure our borders. I will repeal and replace Obamacare. You will have the most beautiful healthcare, you won’t believe. I alone can fix it. There is substantial evidence of voter fraud.

I got at least a thousand more, but I got better things to do with my time.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, UT alum said:

Mexico will pay for the wall. North Korea just announced plans to denuclearize. US steel just announced they are building six new steel mills. Kurds are much safer now. China will pay tariffs, not us. Democrats oppose any effort to secure our borders. I will repeal and replace Obamacare. You will have the most beautiful healthcare, you won’t believe. I alone can fix it. There is substantial evidence of voter fraud.

I got at least a thousand more, but I got better things to do with my time.

 

 

 

I can trade Obama statements for Trump statements just as long as you wish.  Name the last President you know that did any different

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, stevenash said:

I can trade Obama statements for Trump statements just as long as you wish.  Name the last President you know that did any different

Here comes ‘ol whatabout.

I meant to ask before my previous post - is there such a thing as an inconsequential lie? I thought any lie damaged ones reputation for honesty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, stevenash said:

And these lies that you hear, please give me two or three of the most consequential lies you have heard personally that need absolutely no interpretation but the statements themselves.  Yes, I am interested in CONSEQUENTIAL IRREFUTABLE OUTRIGHT INTENTIONAL  lies..  Additionally, if you have heard them, every other person in this country heard them as well.   Is half the country wrong and you are definitely right?  Or are these "lies" subject to interpretation, conclusions, and judgement of same that are colored by personal like/dislike?  

Oh, I left out this doozy: “Then I have Article 2, where I can do anything I want.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, UT alum said:

Here comes ‘ol whatabout.

I meant to ask before my previous post - is there such a thing as an inconsequential lie? I thought any lie damaged ones reputation for honesty.

If that thought/contention is correct, you must hate EVERYONE who ever occupied an elected office regardless of party affiliation, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, UT alum said:

Mexico will pay for the wall. (They are but not In a monetary sense) North Korea just announced plans to denuclearize. (They did, just that they backed out) US steel just announced they are building six new steel mills. (Don’t recall this one )Kurds are much safer now. (How could anyone foresee them not being safer? Dims cry about war but when the troops are pulled and all hell breaks loose, then the dims cry about the carnage) China will pay tariffs, not us. (Not decided yet) Democrats oppose any effort to secure our borders. (Totally true) I will repeal and replace Obamacare. (He did) You will have the most beautiful healthcare, you won’t believe. I alone can fix it. (Don’t recall this one) There is substantial evidence of voter fraud. (There is)

I got at least a thousand more, but I got better things to do with my time.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bottom line is simply compare the job the two have done.  The economy is roaring and unemployment is at record lows, something that Obama said would never be possible and we should accept high unemployment as the new norm.

Liberals are more interested in what is said and intentions, conservatives are interested in what is done and results.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, stevenash said:

It seems as though whatabouts are acceptable for you but for nobody else if my memory is correct

I try my best not to use the whatabout argument. It didn’t work at all when I was young, and that’s because it’s a bad argument, but one that’s easy to slip into.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,945
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • So you are saying a star baseball SHOULD be doing full contact football drills during the baseball season as his Baseball team prepares for the playoffs?
    • Roger.  I misread your comment. Perhaps the other sports will turn the corner sometime soon.
    • I'm going to agree with this. Individual drills would be fine, but a varsity baseball player should not be involved in full pad practices during the baseball season. Especially, if he is a contributing player on a playoff bound baseball team. This is irresponsible and selfish of the AD/HFC.
    • If there's a specific situation that started this thread, I don't know the details.  Nor do I care.  But I do have an opinion about what I'm gathering from some of the comments. My opinion: I do believe that an AD should leave the players of a particular sport to their respective head coach during that season.  The varsity players of that sport anyway.  I believe it's a little different concerning the sub varsity players of that sport.  If an AD/HFC decides to grab some JV baseball players for some offseason football stuff during the athletics period, I don't have AS MUCH of a problem with it.  I would still consider it a common courtesy to discuss with the head coach of that particular sport to consider their thoughts on it. I also believe that ALL athletes should be lifting and running all year.  When in a particular season, I believe that the head coach of that sport should control the reigns on that topic to implement some sport specific lifting/running during their season.  But all athletes should be in the weight room year round. As far as playing multiple sports?  I'm an advocate.  I know that the popular idea is for potentially good/great players in a specific sport to "focus" on that sport.  And I agree.. but focusing on one sport doesn't mean stopping the others.  It just means prioritizing time in a way that extra work is put into that specific sport.  After hours, weekends, holidays/summer, etc..  Just because you plan on making a push into college baseball (for example) doesn't mean you can't work on baseball during other sports seasons.  That's exactly what I did.. and countless others.  Plus, it's important to maybe learn how to be a role player in a sport that you're not the best at.  Because that's coming. That's my opinion.  And I come from an era where kids played multiple sports if they knew it would be helping.  Helping their classmates.. or just contributing to school pride.  I hate knowing that there are schools that could be much more competitive if their kids would just come out.  It's hard for me to understand if I'm being honest. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...