Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, BobcatDad said:

Might be worst than last year score. If that is possibleĀ 

It want. One he is looking for depth and second they will get a big lead and start just playing to get out of there bcz they are cold lol.Ā 

Posted
1 hour ago, dj said:

It want. One he is looking for depth and second they will get a big lead and start just playing to get out of there bcz they are cold lol.Ā 

Cold... You are predicting SETX weather 6 days out? ā„ļøā„ļø lol

Posted
34 minutes ago, monknuk said:

What type of offense does Huntington run?

The one that won’t score vs WOS lol jk

Posted
52 minutes ago, CCRed said:

That’s just ridiculous that a team gets into the playoffs with a one win season.Ā 

There are some 4 team district you don't even have to win a game and your in.District 16 in d2 and there are at least 3 in D1.

Posted

Greg TepperĀ made a valid point on Twitter earlier. Because he brought up how playoff season is here but it’s also ā€œ4 teams making playoffs is too manyā€ season as well. His answer was Why do those people care so much? How does it impact your life if more kids get to play a meaningful game. Look guys I get it from a competition stand point for almost every #4 vs #1 game. But I get what he is saying. It does give a kid a opportunity to do something special and play in a playoff game. That’s my stance on it

Posted
9 hours ago, aTmfan06 said:

Greg TepperĀ made a valid point on Twitter earlier. Because he brought up how playoff season is here but it’s also ā€œ4 teams making playoffs is too manyā€ season as well. His answer was Why do those people care so much? How does it impact your life if more kids get to play a meaningful game. Look guys I get it from a competition stand point for almost every #4 vs #1 game. But I get what he is saying. It doegive a kid a opportunity to do something special and play in a playoff games . That’s my stance on it

Agree and disagree.3 teams are enough.4th place is just a practice game in most cases.Need to teach you have to earn what your striving for.JMO.

Posted
11 hours ago, aTmfan06 said:

Greg TepperĀ made a valid point on Twitter earlier. Because he brought up how playoff season is here but it’s also ā€œ4 teams making playoffs is too manyā€ season as well. His answer was Why do those people care so much? How does it impact your life if more kids get to play a meaningful game. Look guys I get it from a competition stand point for almost every #4 vs #1 game. But I get what he is saying. It does give a kid a opportunity to do something special and play in a playoff game. That’s my stance on it

And I answered his tweet with this comment:

I guess my issue would be 0-10, 1-9 teams getting in while 6-4, 7-3 teams stay home. I think all districts should have a minimum of 7 teams if you're going to have 4 teams qualify. Right now the current playoff system is more about geography and not about success.

Here's another way to look at it:

Coach A is coach of a team in a district with 7 teams. He has compiled a record of 37 wins and 16 losses over the last 5 years, making the playoffs 1 time, advancing to the 3rd round.

Coach B is a coach in a nearby district (less than 50 miles) that has 4 teams in the district. He has compiled a record of 11 wins and 44 losses, making the playoffs all 5 years, not winning a single playoff game. Coach A has beat Coach B's team soundly all 4 times in non district play. Yet Coach B resume can state he has been to the playoffs 5 times more than Coach A.

I really don't have that big of an issue with 4 teams going as long as every district has a minimum 7 teams. A playoff system (any and every playoff system) should never have 0-10, 1-9 teams qualifying.

I am old school for sure. I don't like this "participation ribbon" society that we have become.

Posted
31 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:

And I answered his tweet with this comment:

I guess my issue would be 0-10, 1-9 teams getting in while 6-4, 7-3 teams stay home. I think all districts should have a minimum of 7 teams if you're going to have 4 teams qualify. Right now the current playoff system is more about geography and not about success.

Here's another way to look at it:

Coach A is coach of a team in a district with 7 teams. He has compiled a record of 37 wins and 16 losses over the last 5 years, making the playoffs 1 time, advancing to the 3rd round.

Coach B is a coach in a nearby district (less than 50 miles) that has 4 teams in the district. He has compiled a record of 11 wins and 44 losses, making the playoffs all 5 years, not winning a single playoff game. Coach A has beat Coach B's team soundly all 4 times in non district play. Yet Coach B resume can state he has been to the playoffs 5 times more than Coach A.

I really don't have that big of an issue with 4 teams going as long as every district has a minimum 7 teams. A playoff system (any and every playoff system) should never have 0-10, 1-9 teams qualifying.

I am old school for sure. I don't like this "participation ribbon" society that we have become.

I agree with you. Ā 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,952
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    H John
    Newest Member
    H John
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...