Jump to content

Turf Fields in SETX


jdawg03

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

well dont get me wrong I love the turf fields, but its obvious to me when all these schools in east and northeast texas can spend millions of dollars on turf fields and there is not one here, that there is something big time wrong with the school finance system.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest JoesBros

It would be nice to have those kind of fields, but I think the grass fields are too classic to mess with. In other words growing up going to PNG games there was nothing like going to a game and smell the grass and everything in the air that let you know you were at a high school game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh it would be nice if at least one stadium would have field turf. No one seems to be willing to bite the financial bullet to do what needs to be done.

Oh yes you hear those complaining about taxes and the rest of the moaning, but the bottom line is that we're getting further behind the standard which teams, coaches, and fans expect.

Honestly the Golden Triangle is quickly slipping below silver to bronze.

Our stadiums in the GT are not that good. Just travel across the state and see for yourself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

your right...I live in Tyler while im at school, and there are 2a fields over there better than our fields here......

If it ever happens, I think Silsbee will be the first school to get turf...Westbrook is a program on the rise and I could possibly see them getting it down the road also if they continue to do well

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well dont get me wrong I love the turf fields' date=' but its obvious to me when all these schools in east and northeast texas can spend millions of dollars on turf fields and there is not one here, that there is something big time wrong with the school finance system.....[/quote']

The average cost for one of these fields is $250-300K. That does not include the prep work and concrete needed to support the field. I could see an additional $350-400K needed for prep work and for concrete. Total you are looking at $500-600K for one of these fields.

If you could get concrete donated or buy it at cost that could save $150K easily.

Here is a link to the company that does Texas Stadium. http://www.sportfield.com/sportfield_content.html

I continue to say it but Jefferson county is one of three counties in the state with declining population from the last census. You ask why there is no investment, I say that first you need people to stay here and show that people want to live here and make a future.

I have the ability to travel weekly for my job and I see these areas like SLC and even ones in East Texas and Houston. We do not have the land nor do we have the $ in developement to create a need for growth like this. To much politics and tort to allow any real business growth in MC, PA, and BMT for that matter. How would you like to invest millions of $ here and the first year have to face any number of handouts and lawsuits from the law offices on every corner here? Not me brother. This goes back to a lot of the areas that are getting these types of facilities are heavier conservative areas that welcome these businesses in and do not put up barriers like we do.

I know this is not a very popular statement but the Unions, Politicians, and Lawyers here make it impossible to create the jobs and then create a need for new developement. We are dying as we speak about it. We just do not know it. Look at what PA and BMt was 30 years ago. Then remember what Orange was back 40 years ago. We are continuing to die and we wonder why no school district or community is willing to fork out the extra $ needed for football stadiums. Makes me sick. :oops:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OCBulldog,

You make some good points on the cost of the stadiums and the declining census of the GT. You know I've seen so many sports teams come and go in my 13 years of living here. The one sport which causes the blood to run and at times to boil is high school football. Remember, we have the fans that pack the stadiums on a Friday night. What better INVESTMENT than a top notch stadium in our area.

Imagine if such a stadium was built on I-10 instead of CAN'T-AFFORD-IT PARK? That would have been a sight to see by the passing traffic on a Friday night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think in alot of cases, it comes down to donars. Look at Tully Stadium. I haven't seen it in yrs., but the last time I did, it was gorgeous. And, if I remember correctly, it cost the school district $1, since it was a donation from Tully. what we need is some rich dude to will us a stadium. don't look at me though. I did some checkin' and there's no money in MY family...all the way back to Moses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Silsbee is already the newest field in SE Texas. They did a nice job on the entire complex. The addition of field turf will just add to the pride and increased interest of people.

You know, the thing Silsbee has goin for it is the paper mill right beside it in Evadale...also have that big LP plant.....theres some money there

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Silsbee is already the newest field in SE Texas. They did a nice job on the entire complex. The addition of field turf will just add to the pride and increased interest of people.

Silsebee is a VERY nice stadium, turf or no turf. I wished they would add more gates to the place so you did not have to hear the announcer say, don't standy by the fence, as it is against fire code. Man that gets old.

I anticipate BH might very well get a turf field soon (now we are 4-A). You know us doo-gooders will see that fine field at Galena Park and boy the politics will start flying. There has been continuous construction there for years now, with new athletic facilities in mot every sport and many new schools or school additions. I hear we are getting an indoor practice facility, but not sure what that includes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If a turf field is coming to the Golden Triangle, it happens in Beaumont first. I could see the 3, possilbe 4 if you add Kelly, Beaumont schools having a "Beaumont Stadium" built. The teams could share the stadium. One team plays at home, one on the road, and one on saturday. This would make the funding a lot easier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    45,968
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    yielder
    Newest Member
    yielder
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Good news for this district is for the next two seasons your bi district opposition shouldn’t be much of a challenge… Royal may be better next year but other than that the district is pretty rough… Very good chance that it’s a clean sweep though
    • It’s terrible no matter what happened. I am always concerned with the news media and social media outright lies or incorrect information that is put out, maybe in a rush to be first. Watching the video, it is easy to see that some of the earlier claims are simply nonsense. The officer might be cleared or he might face trial but we should be disgusted with the misinformation. Having been on scene or shortly after an officer involved shooting three times, I can say that some information that comes out is a complete fabrication. This is a horrible situation no matter who was at fault. I wish that the nonsensical false information would stop. That won’t happen…..  
    • Trump walks to the beat of a different drummer so he could very likely pick a person that is on no one’s radar. Going by typical political logic, assuming that a VP pick might bring 0.5%-1% votes, who should it be? A half to one percent is not much but in a potentially razor thin election, a couple of thousand votes in a state could decide the presidency. Biden won AZ by just over 10,000 votes. The most recent Beaumont mayoral election, where almost no one votes, had over 15,000 votes cast. In GA it was 12,000 votes and Biden did not even get 50%. In WI it was 20,000 and again Biden didn’t get to 50%.  There are other states in that area of percent point difference. How important? If any two AZ, GA and WI flip, Trump would have won. So while the VP probably never matters…. can it this time? I think that it could. What then does the VP pick bring to the table? FL and SC were both won by Trump in 2020 so a favored son vote for Rubio or Scott won’t help Trump. Both are in a fairly comfortable position within the conservative community so they will neither hurt nor help with strong conservative voters.  What about the few fence riders that could and likely will determine the election by either sticking with Biden or switching from the last election? What about the people who did not vote in the last election, but may come out to vote in this one just to support the VP candidate? Could Scott sway a percentage point or two from Black support? Could Rubio help draw a percentage point or two of Hispanic support? Possibly on both counts. Like I already mentioned, they won’t help in their own states because Trump already won those in 2020. I personally think that either would actually do a good job as president (although VP picks are about the politics of being elected and not the “best” possible president) and might be the difference in a few votes but a few votes more is all that is needed.  Or…. My outlier, Tulsi Gabbard.  She had some decent support when are ran for the presidency in the Democrat primary. Could some people follow her because they support her and not necessarily the party? I’m sure that’s true for all candidates. Could she bring female support? As a strong mentally and physically person and a member of the military who was deployed into a combat zone into Iraq. Then she went to OCS and became an officer, then deployed to Kuwait. Can that military history, including deployment into a war swing some votes? As of late, she has been on a one person tirade against Biden and the Democrats. Let’s remember that Ronald Reagan was a Democrat and so was Texas governor John Connally. Connally was not only a Democrat governor in Texas but also Secretary of the Navy under JFK. Both ended up switching to the Republican Party so there is a fairly strong history of former Democrats switching parties and being successful, all the way up to the presidency. Gabbard is a pretty fiery campaigner and doesn’t mince her words. She would really be a thorn in the Democrats’ hopes and has the inside knowledge of the party. Could she potentially swing more votes than Scott or Rubio? I think so. But…. I don’t think that Trump would pick her and I’m not sure that she would accept if offered. Her odds of being Trump's pick are at about 1%.  Scott or Rubio at about 10%. Trump being Trump, will choose someone who no one has ever heard of. 
    • So biden's a creepy old pedophile after all...shocker! But that's where the smart votes are landing.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...