Jump to content

Woodville 60 Warren 0/FINAL


WOSgrad

Recommended Posts

Guest ECBucFan
9 hours ago, eagleswoodville#1 said:

 

9 hours ago, eagleswoodville#1 said:

 Woodville! 2-point good! 

 

Q2 0:17

 

Woodville 48

Warren 0

 

Up by 46 in the 2nd quarter and still going for 2 after each TD?

Perhaps there is more to the story than meets the eye. Does WV just not kick Xpt's by design? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have seen every game and we don't kick extra points ! Nobody tried to run up the score in this game . Warren did crazy things , refusing to punt in the game giving us a short field . They didn't  attempt a punt to help themselves out until the game was way out of hand. In the second have our starters played one series and that was it . After that the coaches did a great job having mass meetings pulling together entire units of offenses and defense . These backs ups practices all year and wait their turn you can not ask them not to play hard ! You can ask Warren to run a different offense to give their kids a chance ! They are running the Wishbone , this offense was built on the ONE play that Warren does not run , the triple option and to run it you need 3 and 3.5 ft splits , Warren did not do either ! If people want to complain complain to Warren for putting their kids in a unsuccessful situation but as for Woodville, we played with CLASS ! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not going to lie, there is nothing I like better than beating your rival in whatever sport it is.  There is nothing I hate worse than to have a running clock because you are getting beat that bad or just taking a knee to keep from scoring.  If the score ends up being 100 to 0, I am fine with that.  I hate being shown mercy on the football field.  There are only two Warren  posters on this board regular and that is me and 88Warrior .  Neither one of us have been on here complaining or accusing anyway of being classless.  It is what it is.  I do not recall a parade though.  My two cents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,953
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • No doubt. It's definitely intriguing enough to watch how this all plays out...
    • We all know that each state has its own laws which can be very different, especially in endeavors like annexation or incorporation, so there is no telling what Louisiana law says. I don’t know but I doubt that there is a point of appeal for Baton Rouge to force St. George to be absorbed back into Baton Rouge by now giving them what they asked for years ago. “Oh, we lost? Well let’s just undo incorporation, ruled as legal by the Supreme Court (of LA)  by going back and giving them what they asked for”. There has to be a law allowing such an appeal. I think what I read about the lower court decisions which actually backed up Baton Rouge, they did not all rule that incorporation was illegal but that they did not think the city could have services up and running soon enough. So you have a court saying that sure you can split but only if we agree that you can provide services get enough. In Louisiana, who knows? I doubt that Texas has such a mechanism to allow a city to split, for example, could the west end of Beaumont say that they wish to make their own city against Beaumont’s objection? I doubt it. Certainly Beaumont could allow a city to be created as Port Arthur did with Bridge City and Taylor’s Landing. There is a huge difference in allowing and forcing which is what happened in Baton Rouge. Similar to the sometime discussed topic of Texas splitting off from the United States because they don’t like the way things are going, think if citizens in any city in the United States were allowed to create their own city, which could not be stopped by the parent city.  That could get interesting!! Don't like what is happening in the south side of Chicago? Just de-annex and create your own city!! Anyway, I thought that it is an interesting story when the capital city splits in half.   
    • Wasn't that 1st round loss last year? Also, during those previous 10 years I am pretty sure Jasper didn't go 2-58 in district play in the other 5 sports.
    • Ma'am, I don't think he said all Muslims were like that. If I'm reading this right, he's referencing the terrorist Muslims. You know, the ones who commit murder & have no regard for anyone who doesn't follow their jihadist beliefs...
    • Great playoff run, no doubt.  They did make the 3rd round(1 less) 4 of the previous 10 years, only one first round loss. 6 district championships and 4 second place.  The only 4 years Carthage was in the same district. So no, I'm not sure it does make sense.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...