Jump to content

Livingston

oldschool2

By oldschool2
in High School Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

oldschool2

oldschool2

Posted
Posted

Is there going to be any kind of consequence for the fact that they turned in fewer numbers than they really had?  Didn't that kind of mess up several pre-season schedules?

Or is it going to be "swept under the rug" and treated as tho they didn't mean to do it?  Just curious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOSgrad

WOSgrad

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, oldschool2 said:

Is there going to be any kind of consequence for the fact that they turned in fewer numbers than they really had?  Didn't that kind of mess up several pre-season schedules?

Or is it going to be "swept under the rug" and treated as tho they didn't mean to do it?  Just curious.

I have heard that further sanctions might be coming down the pike for Livingston, but nothing definite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RaiderRed30

RaiderRed30

Posted
Posted

I read the letter from the Superintendent. I understand that it was illegal, but at the same time should students that are never going to be eligible for UIL competitions be counted as a part of the schools attendance? I mean this for all schools. For the schools that are close to dropping it could help the students that can play or participate in UIL.

If the Superintendent did turn in the number on accident because he or she did not know the actual rule on Alternative Placement students then I do not think their should be punishment. If he or she did then something, but nothing against the students who did not know better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RaiderRed30

RaiderRed30

Posted
Posted

Seems like part of their punishment is their district. According to the latest UIL alignments, 2 other schools were affected by their new numbers.

Livingston has been placed in 22-5A for all sports
Baytown Lee has been moved to 21-5A in every sport except football (it will remain 22-5A for that)
Caney Creek has been moved to 20-5A in every sport except football (it will remain 21-5A for that) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...
Red Dawn

Red Dawn

Posted
Posted
On March 2, 2016 at 5:14 PM, RaiderRed30 said:

Seems like part of their punishment is their district. According to the latest UIL alignments, 2 other schools were affected by their new numbers.

Livingston has been placed in 22-5A for all sports
Baytown Lee has been moved to 21-5A in every sport except football (it will remain 22-5A for that)
Caney Creek has been moved to 20-5A in every sport except football (it will remain 21-5A for that) 

Yep. Not sure how 21-5A getting 10 teams in all sports except football is fair. Why create an 8 & 10 team district? Why not two 9 team districts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RaiderRed30

RaiderRed30

Posted
Posted
59 minutes ago, Red Dawn said:

Yep. Not sure how 21-5A getting 10 teams in all sports except football is fair. Why create an 8 & 10 team district? Why not two 9 team districts?

10 teams is easier than 9 for scheduling. Was surprised at first Caney Creek was going to change but UIL smartly reversed course within a week.

With a 9 team district you play everyone twice for 16 district games over 18 dates. That is a lot of games and in baseball and softball, it is every possible game but one.

With a 10 team district, the teams are divided into two zones and play the teams in their zone twice and the other zone once. This equals 13 district games over 13 dates. Much easier for other sports with game limits, plus no byes. If the district teams choose to they can play a 14th game between the 1st place teams for district championship, 2 and 3 cross zone for the 3rd and 4th playoff spot, and then 4 and 5 would play each other. I

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Red Dawn

Red Dawn

Posted
Posted
On March 19, 2016 at 2:13 PM, RaiderRed30 said:

10 teams is easier than 9 for scheduling. Was surprised at first Caney Creek was going to change but UIL smartly reversed course within a week.

With a 9 team district you play everyone twice for 16 district games over 18 dates. That is a lot of games and in baseball and softball, it is every possible game but one.

With a 10 team district, the teams are divided into two zones and play the teams in their zone twice and the other zone once. This equals 13 district games over 13 dates. Much easier for other sports with game limits, plus no byes. If the district teams choose to they can play a 14th game between the 1st place teams for district championship, 2 and 3 cross zone for the 3rd and 4th playoff spot, and then 4 and 5 would play each other. I

Nice reply. I see what your saying and agree with you.  Thanks for your insight. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Separation Scientist
      Dang "Erectionists"!

      By Separation Scientist · Posted

      To clarify, Dems love wars. They rage daily in the bluest of blue inner citicis. Chicago had 39 shootings over the weekend, 9 dead. Warzone. Baltimore, Memphis, Detroit, etc. I am sure was just as bloody. The blue body count rises daily. I am sure the blue defunding of police and releasing murders without any bail have nothing to do with it. Right?   
    • BS Wildcats
      Fake Pandemic Scam Part 2?!

      By BS Wildcats · Posted

      Will probably be released by the Democrats come September.  Sound familiar?
    • 72 Pinto
      Bridge City is open

      By 72 Pinto · Posted

      Sure.  You reassign an employee and they leave voluntarily instead of being fired and being open to litigation.  The outcome is the same, but you are making my point.  The superintendent and AD and principal are all empowered to make personnel decisions.  Instead of accepting the decision made, you talk about lawyering up, no one else was reprimanded, railroad job.  I am old enough to remember when high school sports taught life lessons...accountability being chief among them.
    • bullets13
      Bridge City is open

      By bullets13 · Posted

      I know absolutely nothing about the situation, but I do know head coaches of sports other than the AD have actual teaching assignments, and I know from my wife having worked in the sped department of multiple schools that it’s not uncommon at all for coaches to shirk those duties.  It could very well be that this was the case at BC.  Or not, I don’t know.  Just bringing this up to point out the fact that, although many coaches only want to worry about coaching, they generally have several other responsibilities at the school.  some of them neglect or ignore these duties entirely.  If he’s been written up for other issues before, it’s a dumb argument to say “he was punished for this and others were not”.  If he had a pile of write ups in his file and they did not then it makes sense that the punishments were different.  
    • Eagles12
      Bridge City is open

      By Eagles12 · Posted

      He wasn’t fired, he was reassigned and people get reassigned all the time. If he was actually fired, then you would have a point, but he wasn’t fired. Based on the information presented here no way this would stand if they fired him and he lawyered up. 

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...