Jump to content
  1. Bruin 29

    Bruin 29

  2. NDN06

    NDN06

  3. VP77

    VP77

  4. freelancer1-1

    freelancer1-1

  5. Proud Dawg

    Proud Dawg

  6. Play to win

    Play to win

  7. rc2182

    rc2182

  8. GATA!

    GATA!

  9. 3Falcons

    3Falcons

  10. RETIREDFAN1

    RETIREDFAN1

  11. 3A-CC-Coach

    3A-CC-Coach

  12. TurtleMan

    TurtleMan

  13. TxHoops

    TxHoops

  14. L-Train11

    L-Train11

  15. Tyler Dixson

    Tyler Dixson

  16. thetragichippy

    thetragichippy

  17. Pepper Brooks

    Pepper Brooks

  18. BADSANTA

    BADSANTA

  19. studd88

    studd88

  20. Mr. Buddy Garrity

    Mr. Buddy Garrity

  21. MYHOUSE

    MYHOUSE

  22. BellBiz30

    BellBiz30

  23. AthleticSupporter - Jock

    AthleticSupporter - Jock

  24. BMTSoulja1

    BMTSoulja1

  25. NDNation

    NDNation

  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Sure.  You reassign an employee and they leave voluntarily instead of being fired and being open to litigation.  The outcome is the same, but you are making my point.  The superintendent and AD and principal are all empowered to make personnel decisions.  Instead of accepting the decision made, you talk about lawyering up, no one else was reprimanded, railroad job.  I am old enough to remember when high school sports taught life lessons...accountability being chief among them.
    • I know absolutely nothing about the situation, but I do know head coaches of sports other than the AD have actual teaching assignments, and I know from my wife having worked in the sped department of multiple schools that it’s not uncommon at all for coaches to shirk those duties.  It could very well be that this was the case at BC.  Or not, I don’t know.  Just bringing this up to point out the fact that, although many coaches only want to worry about coaching, they generally have several other responsibilities at the school.  some of them neglect or ignore these duties entirely.  If he’s been written up for other issues before, it’s a dumb argument to say “he was punished for this and others were not”.  If he had a pile of write ups in his file and they did not then it makes sense that the punishments were different.  
    • He wasn’t fired, he was reassigned and people get reassigned all the time. If he was actually fired, then you would have a point, but he wasn’t fired. Based on the information presented here no way this would stand if they fired him and he lawyered up. 
    • I heard the assistant was going to get this job and assume it was referring to the old Vidor coach, Nate Smith.  I always thought he did more with less at Vidor and can't help but think he shares some responsibility in Vidor's recent success. 
    • Classic Bridge City.  Always someone else's fault, refs/umpires cheated, AD with an agenda, yada, yada, yada.  As far as I can tell it's damn near impossible to get fired at these schools so when someone does get fired, it's usually something.  Drama at Bridge City is a constant.  The guy did a good job coaching basketball and I'm sure he'll continue that somewhere else.  Time to move on.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...