Jump to content

SECond to none


team first

Recommended Posts

You still trying to preach that SEC non-conference line.
 
So let's look at the Big 2 (Baylor and TCU) non-conference schedule for this year will we.
 
SMU (both teams), SFA, Lamar and Rice.
 
Not exactly loaded with powerhouse programs is it?

If it's a relevant sermon, you keep preaching it. 

John 8:7

When they kept on questioning him, he straightened up and said to them, "Let any one of you who is without sin be the first to throw a stone at her."
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When they kept on questioning him, he straightened up and said to them, "Let any one of you who is without sin be the first to throw a stone at her."

Maybe just Maybe you should listen to his advice!  In this discussion it appears to me that your team (a Big 12 member) has no room to "throw stones" at the SEC - In my opinion.

When the Big 12 programs continue to schedule cupcakes like SFA, Lamar, Georgia Southern , Liberty, UNI, Toledo, Central Arkansas, Rice, Texas-San Antonio, Akron, South Dakota State, UTEP (which by the way several of the SEC teams play teams off this list as well), Kansas, Iowa State and others ...... I would equate that to throwing stones.

Opppppps - sorry should have left Kansas and Iowa State off that list - while cupcakes that are on the conference schedule.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When they kept on questioning him, he straightened up and said to them, "Let any one of you who is without sin be the first to throw a stone at her."

Maybe just Maybe you should listen to his advice!  In this discussion it appears to me that your team (a Big 12 member) has no room to "throw stones" at the SEC - In my opinion.

When the Big 12 programs continue to schedule cupcakes like SFA, Lamar, Georgia Southern , Liberty, UNI, Toledo, Central Arkansas, Rice, Texas-San Antonio, Akron, South Dakota State, UTEP (which by the way several of the SEC teams play teams off this list as well), Kansas, Iowa State and others ...... I would equate that to throwing stones.

Opppppps - sorry should have left Kansas and Iowa State off that list - while cupcakes that are on the conference schedule.

I don't recall anyone that supports Texas or any Big XII team ever suggesting that they are a superior conference in any way. You would say "It's because the Big XII-2 or Big 2" is not a superior conference. However true that may be, it's not relevant.

I could care less about other schools in the Big XII. As a matter of fact, most fans of Big XII schools support their university and NOT the conference. If the Big XII shut down operations TODAY, Texas would be no better or no worse than they are right now. 

Change is taking place in Austin. To quote Selena Kyle:

"There's a storm coming. You and your friends better batten down the hatches, because when it hits, you're all gonna wonder how you ever thought you could live so large and leave so little for the rest of us."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When they kept on questioning him, he straightened up and said to them, "Let any one of you who is without sin be the first to throw a stone at her."

Maybe just Maybe you should listen to his advice!  In this discussion it appears to me that your team (a Big 12 member) has no room to "throw stones" at the SEC - In my opinion.

When the Big 12 programs continue to schedule cupcakes like SFA, Lamar, Georgia Southern , Liberty, UNI, Toledo, Central Arkansas, Rice, Texas-San Antonio, Akron, South Dakota State, UTEP (which by the way several of the SEC teams play teams off this list as well), Kansas, Iowa State and others ...... I would equate that to throwing stones.

Opppppps - sorry should have left Kansas and Iowa State off that list - while cupcakes that are on the conference schedule.

Kind of like Vandy and Kentucky?  And I'm not trying to open any wounds, just because A&M recently finished the season tied with cupcake Vandy in the conference standings....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But, for those of us not in a remedial minded conference and who are concerned with our own team, I think Notre Dame, Cal and Rice is a respectable enough non-conference schedule.  And will have Notre Dame, USC, LSU, Arkansas, Ohio State and/or Michigan on the schedule over the next decade or so....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

since we're using time machines, are we allowed to go back 10 years or is 3 years the limit?  I get confused

 Your call. The last 3 years there has only been 1 meaningful game between OSU/Oregon and the SEC. 

Overall Oregon is 4-5 (0-1) bowl games and Ohio State is 5-11-1 (2-10) bowl games

 0-3 in National Championship games. 

Back to back embarrassments for Ohio State after getting routed by Florida 41-14 and LSU 38-24, both of which Ohio State came in as the #1 ranked team. (Man their schedule must have really been something those years)

Also Oregon came in as the higher ranked team when LSU beat them 40-27 to start off the season in 2011. 

Must I go on? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Your call. The last 3 years there has only been 1 meaningful game between OSU/Oregon and the SEC. 

Overall Oregon is 4-5 (0-1) bowl games and Ohio State is 5-11-1 (2-10) bowl games

 0-3 in National Championship games. 

Back to back embarrassments for Ohio State after getting routed by Florida 41-14 and LSU 38-24, both of which Ohio State came in as the #1 ranked team. (Man their schedule must have really been something those years)

Also Oregon came in as the higher ranked team when LSU beat them 40-27 to start off the season in 2011. 

Must I go on? 

how is that Delorean driving?  You might stop off in Columbus, Ohio and visit the NC trophy on your journey.   The same trophy tOSU won after b**** slapping Bama in the playoffs...

Or does your memory cut off 3 years ago?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If any two teams play for the national title and neither is from the sec, then these two teams are second to none. Pretty simple really.

also, funny how there is always a Texas vs. the world comment even when the thread is about the sec being second to none. I guess we will have to endure these lame comments every freakin year because some just don't get it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good so u admit tx sucks ??? Cause u would need more the the Delorean to get back to one of there (sic) good years 

answer the question does tx suck ??  

We shall see.  We will also see how awful your Tigers are this year.  

As for our good years, we have won a championship  and played for another more recently than one of th titles you brag about on here (actually the half title you brag about - everyone knows USC was the real champion that year).  So can I borrow your Delorian when you get done with it?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,978
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Tomball takes wild 2nd game 8-6. Both teams had 3 E's. Tomball gave up a late lead but first game pitching star Sampson nailed a 3 run homer to push Tomball to victory. 
    • My understanding is that the falsification of records was the crime that he was convicted of… but for it to have been a felony act, it had to have occurred in the furtherance of another criminal act. The prosecution had to first prove that the criminal act of falsifying documents had occurred. IF the jury believed that records were falsified, they were given three possible criminal acts… any one of the three would allow a felony conviction. The instructions stated that for any of the 34 charges, all twelve of the jurors had to agree that records were falsified, but they also had to believe that the records were falsified in the furtherance of at least one other, different crime. Six jurors could believe that Trump was falsifying records to avoid paying taxes… the other six could believe that it was skirt around election laws. The jurors didn’t have to agree on which of the three alleged criminal acts Trump was trying to further by falsifying records, just so long as they agreed that a) the falsification occurred and that it b) occurred to help him cover up another crime (for which he wasn’t charged and never proven to have committed or to have even occurred, for that matter).     Complete pile of crap as a prosecution, in my opinion.     But, we shouldn’t cry if our nominee is the kind of man who bangs porn stars while his wife is at home with the kid, then tries to buy her silence, then breaks the law in regards to falsifying documents to hide the evidence of the coverup.    If you’re wondering why falsifying those records might be illegal, it’s this. Money paid to your attorney for services performed can be deducted from one’s taxes as a legal expense. If the money is paid to a person to settle a personal claim, then the amount would be taxable-the falsification would have been done to avoid taxation. On the other hand, if campaign funds were spent to pay hush money and the records were falsified to hide the violation of campaign laws, then the felony occurred.    The bottom line is this…. They didn’t have enough evidence to indict trump on any of those three things that allegedly happened… but they DID have evidence that the financial records were falsified, so they point at these other acts which can’t be proven to bump the charges on falsification to a felony.    And the reason Trump didn’t take the stand is that he can’t go on the record about whether or not he had sex with Daniels… I’m certain that they can prove it and hang him up on perjury too.    The most delicious irony is this… Trump gave his supporters too much credit for their integrity. He thought they’d turn on him if they found out what he’d done, when in reality they wouldn’t have given a care… Trump’s whole falsifying records and quest for secrecy wasn’t even needed… his followers don’t have moral objections to his sinful acts.  
    • Wake is about to go from Preseason #1 to the 1st team eliminated 
    • The Republican Party is dying because of folks like you who want to compromise with socialists and folks that proclaim “from the river to the sea” in reference to Israel.  I don’t want a party that folks such as yourself want to save, may as well be democrats, which you apparently are. My standards haven’t changed, yours have.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...