Jump to content

Without Due Process?


smitty

Recommended Posts

How come Bush didnt handle it (if it did have anything to do with a POTUS in which it doesn't) under his watch when this very issue came about in the early 2000s?


Oh btw the answer is within the question if you can actually read. I made it easy for you.



I 100% stand by my previous posts regardless of what you feel or think your "truth" is. Like I also stated before yet again: you need to pay attention to the WHOLE situation. ;)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How come Bush didnt handle it (if it did have anything to do with a POTUS in which it doesn't) under his watch when this very issue came about in the early 2000s?


Oh btw the answer is within the question if you can actually read. I made it easy for you.



I 100% stand by my previous posts regardless of what you feel or think your "truth" is. Like I also stated before yet again: you need to pay attention to the WHOLE situation. ;)

The point is  -- no one needs to handle the situation.  All of them needs to stay out of private property rights unless it been through due process.   That's the original post.  Again -- if obama didn't want it done  -- it would NOT have happened!   The original statement was Patent Office takes private property without due process and was done with obama's blessing.  Nothing that has been debated here so far has proved otherwise.  And it doesn't matter what has been done in the past.  Whatever was done then was also done with the President's blessing who ever it was at the time.  Again -- it still doesn't change the fact that obama wanted this...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It isnt his fault so the bashing is just a fact as done in most threads on this side of the forum, and actually has nothing to do with the administration in a major fashion but i'll let the others cook though. I know a little more about this situation than most folks seeing as this has happened more than once already and I paid attention to it. 
 
They will appeal and win as they have done previously. I'll say this: Goodell is about money, just like Snyder is and I dont see this even being an issue come August, money talks.... ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL...Obama definitely doesn't have the market on criticism and it sure didn't start in 2009.

Bush blew up the levees... Bush hates black people... 9-11 was an inside job.


Not all of the left believed that, as not all of the right believes everything is Obama's fault. I completely disagree with 90% of his policies and can't stand the way he passed Obamacare, but I don't fault him for this one.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not all of the left believed that, as not all of the right believes everything is Obama's fault. I completely disagree with 90% of his policies and can't stand the way he passed Obamacare, but I don't fault him for this one.

this same situation will happen after the next election and the same appeal will be filed. Like I said before the only way something comes of this is if the NFL starts losing money. Situation not even that complex the way certain folks trying to make it out to be. ;)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not all of the left believed that, as not all of the right believes everything is Obama's fault. I completely disagree with 90% of his policies and can't stand the way he passed Obamacare, but I don't fault him for this one.


Missed my point...I was simply pointing out that Bush received much more criticism than this President...in general, but neither he or his administration whined about it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Missed my point...I was simply pointing out that Bush received much more criticism than this President...in general, but neither he or his administration whined about it.


People can say what they want about Bush but the man has class. He has not once said anything negative about Obama because he respects the office!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,968
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    yielder
    Newest Member
    yielder
    Joined


  • Posts

    • He's steadily improving rapidly. Not that your opinion matters much based on some of the wild projections you've made on this site 
    • Cohen……a lying, backstabbing pos who does nothing but lie every time he opens his mouth. Let him utter words the prosecution wants to hear, and we can convict. Cohen told his ex advisor that he wanted to kill himself. What a worldly loss that would be. Let anyone on this board be put through the wringer with false charges and lies like Trump has had to endure, and you would be screaming at the top of your lungs how illegal all of this is.
    • It was and remains perfectly timed and choregraphed Kangaroo Court, whatever Cohen just said or lied about.  Face it, under Soros installed Biden and Merrick Garland, the USA is now officially a Bananna Republic with a Goverment that weaponizes itself against and destroys its political rivals. Putin and Xi are SO proud!  Dang I miss Democracy.       
    • I haven’t been watching closely, but even the liberal sources even tell the story as “the defense really took apart Cohen’s testimony on Thursday.” It sounds like sloppy work from the prosecution to point out a specific call as being “the one,” when it was easily concluded that this particular call could not have occurred the way that Cohen (and the prosecution) claim it to have happened.    The bad news is that I doubt that it matters much-I suspect that most jurors minds were closed before testimony started.   I don’t see Trump leaving with anything less than a conviction based on the venue (NYC).
    • Tough case all the way around.  The guy had a lot of online activity come out where he made racist statements and statements about killing BLM protesters and looters.  So when he then goes out and does it, it looks really bad.  I've seen a lot of videos where people have driven through protestors, defended themselves against them, etc., and didn't bat an eye.  This feels different, but that doesn't necessarily make it murder, either.  His account of the events that happened vs. the witness accounts were both very different, but I'd also expect both sides' accounts to be self-serving and inaccurate to fit their narrative.  Not really sure what to think on this one.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...