Jump to content

Let's pick on another school district for a while

PhatMack19

By PhatMack19
in The Locker Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

bullets13

bullets13

Posted
Posted

Personally speaking; if I was being taught or instructed by a man dressed as a woman I would have a hard time staying focused or giving the instructor the credibility deserved. JMO, right or wrong.

have you seen pictures of the guy/girl?  she really looks quite ordinary.  i'd be pretty distracted if she came in dressed up like a drag queen, but from what i've seen in the media, i just don't see much there that is going to get the kids wound up.  as for distractions, i know a teacher that weighs nearly 600 lbs.  Should he be put before the board because he's a distraction?  should good looking female teachers be put before the board because they're distractions?  i remember in 5th or 6th grade we had a young, attractive teacher who wore tight, form hugging shirts, and it was generally quite obvious when it was cold in the room.  she was dressed nice, she didn't show a bunch of cleavage or anything like that, but on most days most of the boys had their attention glued to the teacher, but i don't believe many of us heard what she was saying.  all that to say, apart from maybe a temporary distraction, i'm having a hard time buying the argument, and it's even harder in light of the fact that this sub had apparently subbed there multiple times before without significant enough of a distraction for it to be brought up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 173
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

fox
fox

isn't OZEN looking for a football coach…..   problem solved  :)

tvc184
tvc184

You say that you can understand what he is going through..... but then toss out that you understand that someone might be uncomfortable that you are a man in that position.   Do you understand then

thetragichippy
thetragichippy

I'm a Lumberton conservative parent and my child is in the next school up......here is my only issue....   If he is a man and you can tell (did not see him) the kids would ask probably....why are yo

thetragichippy

thetragichippy

Posted
Posted

Hippy, by all means, please give is the 411. Surely, you're at the board meeting. Do spit it out. Because I see you still posting on the BISD thread tonight.

 

Like I have said many times....unlike others, I don't get on here and defend my school district because they are like me.......

 

I think they handled this completely wrong......Had I been in charge....

 

1.  If LISD decided we didn't want her back....I would have let her complete whatever schedule she had and not called her back (she is on a list with other subs) ...end of problem.

 

2.  If LISD agreed she should teach, she would still be on the list and she could be called.....

 

Note....there is no discrimination case according to the laws I have looked up.....but if they fire her, there will probably be a case and it may be a huge mistake for the district......

 

They should of handled it like I said and we wouldn't be having this conversation.......

 

Oh yea......GO RAIDERS :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BMTSoulja1

BMTSoulja1

Posted
Posted

Like I have said many times....unlike others, I don't get on here and defend my school district because they are like me.......

I think they handled this completely wrong......Had I been in charge....

1. If LISD decided we didn't want her back....I would have let her complete whatever schedule she had and not called her back (she is on a list with other subs) ...end of problem.

2. If LISD agreed she should teach, she would still be on the list and she could be called.....

Note....there is no discrimination case according to the laws I have looked up.....but if they fire her, there will probably be a case and it may be a huge mistake for the district......

They should of handled it like I said and we wouldn't be having this conversation.......

Oh yea......GO RAIDERS :D

Not bad, Hippy. I COMPLETELY agree. (which is not often with us. ;) )
Link to comment
Share on other sites
thetragichippy

thetragichippy

Posted
Posted

People keep mentioning her/him being fired. Correct me if I'm wrong but subs are on a list and are called on an as needed basis and are not permanent employees of the district. They don't need to fire her/him, just don't call them anymore.

 

yes,,,but it appears LISD didn't want BISD hogging up all that free press, so they made it a controversial issue when it was a simple fix........

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mat

mat

Posted
Posted

I have already stated my view but here’s the real question. Why and how was (s)he hired? Was his gender and situation revealed prior to hiring? Did he mislead them during the hiring process? Did they know his situation and hire him anyway?

 

If they hired him know he was a man who dressed and acted like woman then they should support their hire. If they were misled and the sub misrepresented himself they should quit using him as a sub.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,976
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    kofajas476
    Newest Member
    kofajas476
    Joined


  • Posts

    • baddog
      America lost. The Kangaroo Court won.

      By baddog · Posted

      This helps explain what I was getting at. Great video.     
    • Reagan
      Precedents Established By President Trump!

      By Reagan · Posted

      See new post This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   Sentencing set 4 days before the RNC Convention to nominate Trump. This is all GREAT NEWS for & . 1) Trump Presidential victory sealed. 2) Precedent now set for Bush, Clinton, Obama arrests. 3) Overturn on Appeal guaranteed. 4) Top-to-Bottom DOJ Corruption exposed. 5) U.S. Supreme Court will be FORCED to conduct Emergency Review of “case” and make a ruling. 6) Supreme Court is a “captured” entity that fully understands they uphold the Law or individually face UCMJ Treason trial for violating their Sworn Oaths to the Constitution. 7) No civilian admirably law court can override a UCMJ protected Commander-in-Chief, no matter the amount of propaganda they use. 8) CIC Trump is untouchable. He’s simply leading the Swamp Rats to their final resting places. 9) Brunson Case verdict remains a proverbial nuclear weapon that can be deployed to eradicate the vast majority of House & Senate members for violating their sworn oaths on January 6, 2021, by unconstitutionally certifying the 2020 election without an investigation. 10) This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  holds ALL THE CARDS. Watch him win it all! Election Interference is This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up .  ALL found guilty must forfeit all personal, family and corporate assets to the U.S. Treasury. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up just won the lottery and will soon win our Republic back!
    • Reagan
      America lost. The Kangaroo Court won.

      By Reagan · Posted

      Can't even talk without a teleprompter!  
    • tvc184
      West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin leaves Democratic Party, registers as independent

      By tvc184 · Posted

      He almost singlehandedly saved the filibuster in the Senate by siding with the Republicans in what would have been a stupid move. 
    • Reagan
      Precedents Established By President Trump!

      By Reagan · Posted

      1. Presidents and Former Presidents can be impeached 2. Presidents and Former Presidents can be forced to reveal tax and business records 3. Presidents and Former Presidents lose executive privilege 4. Presidents and Former Presidents lose attorney-client privilege 5. Presidents and Former Presidents can be forced to release private phone records and text messages 6. Presidents and Former Presidents can have their homes raided by the FBI 7. Presidents and Former Presidents can be subpoenaed by partisan committees 8. Presidents and Former Presidents can be repeatedly indicted and arrested 9. Presidents and Former Presidents lose their First Amendment right to free speech 10. Presidents and Former Presidents lose the right to a jury trial 11. VP no longer has authority to question validity of disputed electoral votes 12. The losing party no longer has authority to submit contingent electors when results are disputed 13. Presidents and Former Presidents don't have Presidential Immunity BOOMERANG The reckoning is coming!   Evil always finds out.  Just ask Hitler! *Trump 2024*

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...