Englebert

Someone got his feathers riled. It's funny that the anger stems from responses to absurdity, making it completely self-inflicted.

Wow, an internet tough guy now? Join the millions. And it's funny you don't like profiling while continuing to profile. You don't like posters making assumptions about you but you constantly make assumptions about other posters. Must be the mindset ingrained by the Liberal masters.

Somehow in your feeble mind Conservatives are responsible for running off Liberal posters based on my post while reading your pathetic response. If the light ever came on in your brain you be would blinded beyond repair. Forget the 3rd graders, even the Liberals are now laughing at you.

You continually show your lack of comprehension skills. And it is comical that you freely display these severely lacking skills and even try interpreting for your superior intellectuals (yes, that includes nappy roots). Carry on...we were starting to miss the comedic relief.

Thanks new tobie for this. We've gone a whole few days without one reference to "grab'em". Maybe the Liberal posters might feel free to rejoin this board, knowing that they don't have to defend "by association" your pathetic posts. Big Girl and six burg have rejoined the fray since your proclamation...which I assume is due to the fact that they once again feel free to express their opinions without your harmful help.

You have to not get caught when you proclaim you made an attempt to find work...and nobody checks. You are just that stupid naïve aren't you (the benefit of the doubt is being stretched to it's capacity). It's called abuse. Learn it, know it, politician poses (you'll catch this if you watch some of the recent commercials.)

I don't know the qualifications or disqualifications of his opponent. If he is running against a Liberal, then yes he should in win in a landside even if he is deemed mentally insane..the lesser of two mentally incompetences. The last presidential race should have open every ones eyes to that...but sadly some remain closed.

I'm not a big fan of McCain, but I like him more for shooting down this horrible bill. I'm pretty pissed at every Congressman that supports it. When are they gonna get it through their thick skulls that "Replacement" is not an option. Many thanks go out to McCain and especially Rand Paul for their stance on this. Now just repeal Obamacare already.

And one spouting garbage that nobody wants to hear. Congrats on dumbing down this forum.

Are you actually suggesting that because we call out Liberal posters and don't let them get by with false, inaccurate a sweeping generalizations that we are somehow at fault. What should we do to keep the Liberals posters...give out "likes" when they bash Trump with pathetic lies. Should we reply with "That's a good boy" after reading these pathetic statements. Please give us a roadmap on how, or why, we should coddle the Liberal posters when they spew their hate-filled garbage on this site. My question for you is "Is the website better or worse when void of the Liberal hate-speech?"

This exact article could have been written in the late 1990s...and many were, but were ignored...just like this one will be. All of the models have been wrong, and wrong on the warm side. Any sane person would have to question why the models are always wrong, and are always wrong on one side. Could it be due to the fact that if a crisis exists or is imminent, the money for research/remediation flows like wine, and if a catastrophic issue is not a hand, the money becomes scarce? I don't have the time to give this issue the proper response just yet, but I will definitely revisit this issue at a later date.

You didn't say because you don't want to admit the negativity and hate is primarily generated by the Left. That is undisputable, but you and your ilk always try to play the equivalency card. That's just like saying Lois Lerner and the IRS targeted each side. My post had nothing to do with race, but as usual you have to bring it up because you won't dare tackle the issue at hand. And you are right up there with the king of misinterpreting the type of talk I brought up in my last post. You bring it up and run like a little child when challenged to defend your statements. I'll save my posts for Big Girl and newtobie, but will also call you out when you post that nonsense. You've made some good posts in the past and some good posts recently, but you still maintain your Liberal stance that me and everyone on this board that doesn't tow the Liberal line is inherently racist and bigoted, and the percentage of bad eggs are somehow equal. You have made it abundantly clear you follow the Liberal agenda and have no problem throwing out backhanded insults to non-Liberals. Go run and hide some more...but don't think I won't call you out or ask you to defend your statements.

Who is spouting the negativity and hate? Please call them out...Left or Right. I bet you won't do it. I think you are using the old tired "tried and true" tactic of equivalency when equivalency does not exist. So please, engage in your best attempt to defend this statement. I don't think I will hold my breath.

Why would you resist going back to the days of real men...the days of your heroes. Oops, I get it...you only spout out crapola when you think it sounds good but have no inkling of a smidgen of a slice of an idea of what you are talking about. Luckily most on this board see through your imbecilic rhetoric that is actually just plagiarized non-sense garnered from the biased media that pulls your puppet strings, and we continually laugh at your absurdity. And as Westend1 would say...LOL.

Thanks for confirming that exists only in your imagination land. Seek help before the bile destroys what few brain cells you have left. Maybe a trip to the land that still holds fellow men as slaves would educate you on your station in life...the attainment that was fought for by both of our blood lines.

It's nice know that you think you can judge what we would think, but your past posts have proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that you are extremely incapable of making such determinations.

Are you trying to make a point with this link? Please explain. Your biased hate for Trump seems to make you quote worthless garbage that you somehow feel is relevant.

You really need to read a book once in a while. Please do some research on the biography of each of those men listed and see if your angel-like admiration holds up. And please make sure not to forget to research how many minorities each of these men hired for any position above grunt laborer.

The same one that lied to your face about keeping your doctor and healthcare system. The same one that weaponized the EPA and IRS. The same one that spied on reporters and political rivals. But you conveniently forget and forgive him for that, but feel a searing bile spewing from you gut when Trump embellishes a golf score. Your hatred is so hypocritical and so comical.

Yes, the Trump team has rolled out many, many employees bragging about how good it is to work for him. You are just limited to the knowledge that your Liberal handlers want you to hear. And your interpretation skills are severely lacking when judging people, so your analysis of Trump is worth less than garbage. You have a biased hate for Trump, and it is really laughable and sad that you are the only one that cannot see your clouded judgement. At least it is entertaining for us.

I see your comprehension skills have not improved in the last few weeks. But then, I didn't expect improvement. You only see/read what you are conditioned to believe.

You would just close your eyes and read what you want to read anyway.

Let's get Vanderbilt, Rockefeller, Morgan, or Carnegie for President. They can then cut out overtime pay, cut out unions, increase the workweek to 60 hours, cut out sick time, family leave time, maternity and paternity leave, cut out vacation time, cut out 401k and medical benefits. They wouldn't have to worried about Affirmation Action, soft quotas, Civil Rights legislation, or any of the strangling EPA or Conservation legislation. They also wouldn't have to worry about anti-trust laws. The big corporations would then be free to earn obnoxious amounts of money without having to worry about the worker or the environment, just like in the time of their reign.

The refutation is coming. I have been preparing (and partaking) with some friends tonight, but will certainly reply tomorrow. A simple cursory reading is more than enough to show you have absolutely nothing but the same old crap expounded by the neo-nazi global warmists that has no basis in science. I can dispel or call out the highly questionable conclusions of the above "facts" (what most people call propaganda). I'm in the process of preparing for a natural occurrence of "weather" (which will surely be deemed a predicted disaster due to Man-made interference) and am pressed for time at this moment. But I can state with 100% accuracy your post does not give any more credence to the lie that masquerades as a legitimate science model. In fact, the lie still continues to be the biggest and most pathetic attempt of controlling man in the history of mankind. The simple fact that this lie has garnered any credence at all is astonishing. I guess that's what happens when intelligent men get fooled.

Did you even read this article. It basically says, in a nut-shell, man is the cause the global warming and we don't need to provide any stinking evidence. Our "peer-reviewed" studies are hand-picked peers that agree with us 100%. 98% of "climatologists" agree because we did a (laughable) textual search, even though we know this is inherently subjective and highly fallible. The Exxon studies are worthless for the mere fact that they are not in agreement with our undocumented premise. I've laid out the hypothesis for man-made global warming, and this article can't even come close to validating any of the three. In case you forgot, they are: 1) The Earth is warming 2) Man is the cause 3) this warming is detrimental to Earth's health. Simply stating that the Earth is warming, admittedly based on altered and manipulated data is not proof. Saying Man is the cause while providing no casual link is a slap in the face to everyone that adheres to the scientific method. These people are the real science deniers. So I'm guessing that the education part is your admittance that the Man-Made Global Warming people are neo-nazi fascists that want to dictate and control every aspect of our lives through misinformation and junk science. That is what I gathered from this article. Where am I going wrong?