Englebert

Don't disagree with any of that. I'm just curious about the point you were reaching for when posting this. Do you think he was talking out of his arse? Do you attribute "talking out of their arse" when others change their tune? (Actually, I don't even know if he has changed his tune on this subject. He's changed parties numerous times in his life. I don't know what factors dictated the change.) If we want to start trying to embarrass people by playing old clips, many, many Democrat politicians (and many Republican) would have a lot of explaining to do to the politically correct crowd, much less their base.

He looks a lot younger there. Was Trump a registered Democrat when this was filmed? Did he state this when Obama, Hillary, Wild Bill, Biden, etc. all said that marriage was between a man and woman, or did their evolvement come much later? Was Trump spouting lies or did that penchant evolve much later? Can we trust anything that comes out of his mouth? Let's ask CardinalBacker...the definitive authority on all-Trump musings.

Why is it so hard for you to tell the truth? You lie constantly, and this is just another whopper.

Yep, you are the same obnoxious fool that is too childish to control his own emotions. Your mother must be proud of her little boy. Does she refer to you as Silly Willy as well?

Please refrain from tagging me unless you are ready to get banned again. You do know how easy that is don't you.

Your TDS is in full bloom. It's funny, and saddening that you try to judge others perception of reality while you are so blinded by hate. The more you talk about Trump, the more embarrassing you get. Nancy Pelosi sounds almost logical when compared to your TDS inspired rants.

Did Bush (both) beg for negative coverage? Did Reagan beg for negative coverage? Who doesn't understand?

But you are not sane when it comes to Trump, so your TDS inspired analysis of others is garbage.

Now that was some delusional reality laid out right there. If Bernie had 99% non-stop negative coverage, he wouldn't be able to muster a 5% favorability rating. Same with most people of no substance. It's funny that you try to denigrate other's posts on here after some of the whoopers you've laid out regarding Trump.

I once thought you were fairly intelligent. I can admit when I make a mistake. Just think, the buffoon EnlightenedOne/MagaWeTrust/WhateverHeCallsHimselfNow and Big Girl are both compadres of you, applauding your rants. That should be an eye opener if ever there was one. You should really stay off of the Trump topics. Just stick to other topics where you can make intelligent posts that are not influenced or overwhelmingly consumed by Trump hatred (TDS). But if you insist on embarrassing yourself, please explain how any person on the face of the Earth could endure four+ years of constant negative attacks by 99% of the media/Hollywood/Congress/etc., but still get as high as a 30-40 percent approval rating. If these entities would have attacked Obama in the same manner, what do you think his approval would have been? You are so focused on your hatred for Trump, you must justify that unjust analysis by blaming him, instead of blaming yourself for being so easily manipulated. A self-defense mechanism if ever there was one. Is Hillary still up by double digits in your poll you cited? How many different reasons are you going to offer as the definitive one as to why Trump lost? "Rantings of a lunatic"?

You are definitely more than welcome to attend. Just don't tell anyone you are a city boy. (Yes, Bridge City is a big city to us.)

Me too. I'm about to start a fire...with the firewood in my backyard. Hope nothing else burns. Neighbors are coming over. We might discuss who in Hollywood is sleeping with who. How is your night going? What topics are up for discussion in your little world?

Please explain how Trump cost the Republicans the House. I really don't care what you think, I'm just ready to spark our ol' time debates. Those were classic (embarrassing) weren't they. Are you ready? Will you cry to moderators again? I'm ready. Go.

Your turn...except this will be different. I highly admire CardinalBacker, just think he is emotionally triggered by Trump. You on the other hand, well what can I say. You bring no intellectual value to this board...so do you want to start in the gutter or gradually go there like ol' times. I say gutter-time. Didn't you score a zero last time you bowled?

Wow, you are falling way below what I thought you would stoop to. You might want to calm down about now. The hatred swirling in your brain is really making you look foolish. So sad, especially when I fully agree with you on 99% of your posts not concerning Trump. Take a break...you need it.

If that is what you consider as fair assessment across the board, then I can only sadly laugh at you.

This is just hilarious. You can't answer so you resort to name-calling, stereotyping, etc. No, you are not a man. You are wee intellectually-stunted little boy. Is this really where you want to go? Not desirable, but I have no problem playing that game with you. Your TDS is in full bloom. So much so, you are getting hysterical because someone doesn't agree with your blinded assessment. You might want to stay away from any threads dealing with Trump. By now you should know why. Would you like to re-evaluate your post? You need to.

Do you think your accusatory standard for "inciting an attack" would stand up to unbiased scrutiny? Should we hold everyone accountable to this bar? If so, how many Trump-haters in Congress would need to be or required to resign based on your standard of guilt? (You're Fired! -Trump) Would any Democrats be left in Congress? Are you being fair in your assessment? Should this standard be applied across the board, or just to people we don't like or agree with? Try to apply your same standard to someone you admire, and see if it still applies. I already know the answer. Edit: I just read one of your posts in another thread. This concerning Maxine Watters statement. Here is what you posted: "HOWEVER, nothing she did compares to organizing a rally that will conclude with a March to the Capitol to either intimidate lawmakers or even outright halt the Peoples Business by forcefully stopping the constitutional process of electing a new president...which is exactly what happened." She actually called for people to find any Congressman/politician, form a crowd, and get into their face saying they are not welcomed here. But somehow your bar deems this less intimidating that someone calling for a "peaceful protest" (I'm still learning from Lefties on how to frame the narrative...which is a little embarrassing). Can you at least be consistent...across the board...in your evaluations. Of course you can't, because if you did your arguments would fall apart.

You seem to have no problem placing blame based on severe TDS. And that is the reality! If you were a House Representative, would you now vote to impeach President Trump?

Lost it...LOL. You blame someone for the actions of others because you think you can interpret what he meant, and how those words were interpreted by others. Your TDS is flaring up again.

Oh, but Bernie riled that guy up. Bernie didn't say go shoot them, but we all know what he meant, don't we.

So based on this, we can say with 100% positivety that Bernie Sanders is to blame for Republican congressmen being shot at their baseball practice.

When has ethics ever been a priority in big time College Football? LOL.

Balmorhea's road to the championship was unreal. They were ranked #1, but after the first round had to beat the #2, #3, #4, then #5 ranked teams in the State (in that order). Very impressive, especially considering Richland Springs was looking to extend their football state title total lead (and the first double digit title holder in the state). Katy is looking good to catch Richland Springs now. Congrats to Balmorhea. Well deserved.

Do these employees have the right to walk off the job and seek employment elsewhere? Do these employees have the right to form a union and demand safer work conditions. Please elaborate on your opinion of the oppression of the American worker. This topic sounds ripe for discussion. But every time I try to evoke this conversation, it always ends with the other party running like a frightened schoolgirl. Maybe you will stand up with an intellectual debate on whether corporations/big business/small business/Mom & Pop stores/Federal government/State government/Local government gives the working man a fighting chance of standing up to their greedy bosses. (And FYI, I assure you that you have no idea where I stand...so keep those stereotypes you are so famous for where you know they go.) Would you like to have this discussion? I will start a new topic just for this if agreeable.