Englebert

Deblasio has stated that you need a "Proof of Vax" card and an ID for indoor activities: dining, exercising, entertainment, etc. Will this law apply to voting places? I'm guessing he will suggest that voting locations are immune to Covid.

I have driven to Ratliff stadium in Odessa 3 times. I have a friend that lives in San Angelo. Each trip I have driven to her house on Thursday, spent the night, then drove to Odessa the next morning. Attended the game on Friday night, then drove back to San Angelo. Spent the night, then drove back to my house on Saturday. Each trip was for the explicit purpose of watching Odessa Permian. Does it count if you spread the trip out over a few days? I've also driven to Lubbock twice. The purpose was to watch a Texas Tech game, but took in a Wollforth Frenship game once, and a Shallowater game on the other trip. The explicit purpose for the trips was the Texas Tech games, but purposely got there on Friday, early enough to attend the High School games. Does this count?

Now that the Liberals have broken the seal on "proof of membership" papers (New York, and others to follow, mandating through law that people show their vaccination status), what else can we apply this to? The obvious is voter ID. But maybe we can take this further. Can we pass a law, in the same vein as New York's law, in which you must show your citizenship papers to partake in American life? Should we mandate that all restaurants require citizenship papers to enter their premises? Should all grocery stores be required to check proof of citizenship to enter? Should all gas stations require proof of citizenship before filling up? Hospitals? Schools? Should we mandate all city buses require citizenship papers to board? Should all non-citizens be allowed to board but be required to sit in the back of the bus? We all know that Liberals will advocate the necessity of "papers" to save lives. But will they decry the same mentality when the same rationale is reversed? I would love for the Five Man Electrical Band members to respond. Are these band members (I don't know how many are still alive) opposed to the law-mandated "SIGNS" that must be posted on businesses requiring "proof of papers"? If unopposed, will they support other signs requiring "proof of papers"? (Of course, them being Canadian, I think I used a bad example.)

The same reason Trump is not in prison for Russian collusion...aka...treason. Your question was answered immediately after you posted this topic. I don't know whether to laugh at your lack of compression or feel sorry for you. A conundrum for sure. Since your question has been answered, let's contemplate the main purveyors of conspiracy theories in the realm of political relevance. How many people do you think have espoused the idea that Trump would be reinstated on your date versus how many people think Trump was guilty of Russian collusion. It is a question of numbers. Would you like to gander on that? Your whole reason for starting this topic was to ridicule Trump supporters, but when statistical analysis (i.e. common sense) is applied, it is evident that Liberals are the people that should be ridiculed for imbecilic wild theories. How are you not ashamed of yourself? Which party espouses the idea that Black people are too stupid to obtain an ID? More posts like this and you will drop down to Inmagatrust territory. You are already on the edge. The only thing saving you from the cliff is your refrain from personal insults and hilarious but undeserved grandiose attitude.

I thought Trump was in prison due to collusion with Russia, failure to pay his taxes, profiting from the office of the President, creating and enforcing dictatorial policies, treason, aiding and abetting the enemy, war crimes, etc., etc., etc. What happened? I thought Bush and Trump were sharing a prison cell once occupied by Reagan. Do you actually believe the Conservatives/Trump supporters can come anywhere close to the conspiracy theory nutjobs in the Liberal/Anti-Trump party? But if you want to laugh, go ahead. You just reveal your true bias by ignoring the overwhelming superiority of your own party at this game.

How so? Let's put your analytical skills to the test. Show us your self-described intellectual superiority by describing how he "is in the wrong thread". Your verbal skills tell us all we need to know about your intellectual skills. Can we debate on who really is the one in the wrong thread? We all know the identity of that poster. You can run, but...uh, uh, uh, you know guys, I mean...you know the rest. Come on man!

Says the kindergartener to his teacher. The laughter (at you, not with you) continues.

You continually use terms you can't even define. You are a kl8ejknaiuyrwe. I will refuse to give you a definition, but it's bad...real bad. And do you actually believe you can accurately define who is a "normal" conservative? You are funny. Keep the jokes coming.

Since you continually run from questions while simultaneously denigrating others, we would have more fun with "InMagaWeTrust Bad" thread. Which would be easier...making fun of Biden or making fun of InMagaWeTrust? At least Biden has temporary moments of sanity.

I see you are continue to run from questions. Deflection is your only go-to way of saving embarrassment. Or is it? We are all laughing at you.

Did you actually just repeat the often quoted but proven lie that a cop got his brains beat in with a fire extinguisher? Are you really this "misinformed" or just a gullible sheeple? That statement pretty much epitomizes your depth of knowledge of the situation. Who could take you serious when you pull crap like that. You would be infinitely better served by staying off any topics involving Trump. Your blind hatred is making you look incredibly stupid...to the point on par with Magatrust. Seriously, think about that. You are on par with the reigning "worst poster on the board" when you delve into topics involving Trump. I say "I feel sorry for you" jokingly or sarcastically often, but this time the statement is for real. I can't fathom how someone can harbor so much hate for such petty reasons.

This is pure speculation on my part, but until proven otherwise I will stick to my theory. Cuomo is being forced out because of his handling of the Covid situation...specifically the death of many, many elderly. The Cuomo "allies" (the Democratic party) will not allow any further revelations about the deaths, and if any still arise, the party ("allies") can claim "the bad man is gone...old news...no relevance now. Drop the witch hunt." The allied party can claim the high road in which they ousted their "deplorable" on their own accord. Too many people can easily beat the "sexual harassment" charge...and a simple "sorry" works wonders in the Liberal world. Something deeper is afoot. "I could be wrong now...but I don't think so." (Thanks Randy Newman!)

Has there ever been a documented case of an "insurrection" in the history of the world in which the "insurrectionists" brought no weapons to the uprising, killed no one, and even had one of their own killed? Were these people, that were hell-bent on the overthrow of the government, just that stupid to be so unprepared to accomplish this goal? I don't know about the rest of y'all, but that contention is very, very (very, very) (did I say very) laughable. But I digress, mental blindness is no laughing matter. Then again...this contention is hilarious. And while you are contemplating your answer, please include your rationale for why many FBI agents were present, why Nancy Pelosi refused additional security when the rally was well known, and why practically every Democrat lied about the "insurrection". Please include why many, many "insurrectionists" have been imprisoned in solitary confinement for many months with the charge of "trespassing". Please name one person that has been charged with "insurrection". And mostly, please explain why Trump has not been charged with insurrection. I'm especially anxious to hear your rationale for the last one...since you have made it well-known on this board that this should indeed be a foregone conclusion. But I will be happy with just an explanation of the other questions.

Normal people are still laughing at you...even the kindergartners. Your analysis of the posts can only approach toddler level. Would you care to discuss the intricacies or nuances of the posts that you can't comprehend? Of course not...even you know you are sorely deficient in 3rd grade level debate. We will continue laughing at the posts you make. Keep'em coming. (And you actually thought you could deflect the topic by stereotyping. You are "amazingly" pathetic in your attempts at condescension.) You can cry out to me...I will be your ally instead of CardinalBacker. But of course, you first have to have a sensible argument. Nevermind...this rules you out. As much as CardinalBacker is blinded by his hate of Trump, I would be shocked beyond belief ("amazed") if he even considered allying with a pathetically immature and mentally stunted poster that is profusely adamant on getting banned because of that said immaturity. (I jokingly took a jab a CardinalBacker...he doesn't "ally" with anyone...just says his peace. But the cry for help by MagaWeTrust just made me laugh enough to include it.)

What is amazing is how you can diminish the word "amazing". How can someone that has proven over and over to be absolutely deficient of any kind of cognitive thinking have the nerve to evaluate other's posts in a laughably condescending and arrogant fashion. Now that is the epitome of the word "amazing". You win the Gold for total oblivion, and a bonus entertainment value. Give yourself a congratulatory hand. Please bite the medal to see if it is real.

Your reading comprehension skills are atrocious. And I'm sure you would not like me to give an analysis of your posts. The outlook for favorability is very slim.

Awesome. I can think of a thousand more. The topic is so wide open that it is almost impossible to discuss. Not only can a State reject you from moving into the state based on..., can they reject you from leaving the State based on... If ruled that a State cannot reject you from leaving, can they still tax you based on your former citizenship? We might want to ask California. What I find most interesting is that when the colonies were debating on unionizing, i.e. forming the United States, that this topic was not discussed more thoroughly...then especially after independence was won. It makes sense though, considering any breathing body was an asset. No benefits existed at that time. The "what if's" will render the topic either dead on arrival or hotly debated for decades. (Exaggerated of course.) But that is the also the most intriguing part of the debate. What other scenarios will pose problems in implementation? What solutions can be implemented to facilitate the realization of such legislation? Should it even be considered?

I was reading Ty Cobb's response on the topic of Texas Democrat legislators running out on their duties. His proposal was to not allow the politicians that fled to re-enter Texas. This got me to thinking about an issue that I have contemplated for many years. Should individual States have the ability to require State citizenship for a person to reside in their State? I'm not asking for current law (although that is welcomed). I'm asking about the feasibility, pitfalls, morality, duty of protection, etc. of possible future law. I'm not asking about a State revoking American citizenship, just State citizenship. I've read articles, opinions, trash, inciteful opinions...the whole gamut (it seems like) of pros and cons. I haven't thought about the topic in a while, so I would love to revisit it. In full disclosure, after all that I have read on the subject, I have no opinion on the subject. Some of the pondering issues: Should American citizenship be required for State citizenship? Should federal discrimination laws trump State citizenship requirements? What happens if every State rejects an American citizen? Should federal courts be allowed to intervene on State citizenship rulings? If States can require citizenship, can Counties and Cities also require citizenship? The subject will very quickly enter into quicksand if rules were actually applied in practice. I'm just curious as to everyone's opinion. In the state of cancel culture that we now reside in, should individual States be able to cancel you?

Really? Are you whining about mistreatment? Do you feel like you have endured the same level of biased regimental abuse as Trump? One little (wrongly) perceived injustice and you cry like a baby. Do you fit the definition of what you would call a "Trumper"?

If you can't keep up, admit it. We understand. If you can't find an adult, try to find a schoolkid (they are on summer break right now) to explain the links for you.

If "Trumpers" are some of the dumbest people in this country, where does that rank you on the intelligence scale? I do not know one supporter of Trump that you even come close to ranking anywhere near equal...so where do you stand? Why won't you explain what a "Trumper" is? Gullible? Fits you. Are you a rebel? Naw...you are not bright enough to even know what cause is worth fighting for. You might be Antifa though. Then again, as dumb as they are, I don't think they would tolerate your lack of intelligence. Do you idolize Joe? Who cares, neither does anyone else. Nobody idolizes Trump, though the media is desperately trying to make you believe that Trump supporters do. (See the first descriptor. Fits you to a tee.) Excuse bad behavior. You are the king at pointing out perceived faults with Trump/Administration while ignoring factual faults of Joe/Administration. Fits you to a tee. Stereotyping is easy, and takes very, very little intelligence. In fact, one that engages in stereotyping as much as you shows an utter inability of critical thinking. I bet you are the person at work that criticizes everything the boss does (not to their face of course). I bet you frequently tell your coworkers how much better of a job you can do than anyone in the company. I bet you were the little kindergartner that called his degreed teacher stupid. In fact, you seem to be still stuck with that immature mentality. If I cared one iota about you, I would beg for you to seek help. But frankly, I would just rather you keep contributing your comedy routine to this board. So once again, please give your definition of a "Trumper". For bonus points, include in your essay what he did to get you so "triggered". Will you run...thus enduring the ridicule and laughter by showing you are just troll with zero abilities? Or will you attempt an answer...thus enduring the ridicule and laughter by showing you are just a troll with zero abilities?

Your have clearly shown in past posts that you and definitions don't get along. It's cute that you still try. What's your definition of a "Trumper"? You won't answer because you know your answer will deservedly bring you ridicule and shame. Run little one, run.

People with normal intelligence can grasp concepts at a fairly quick pace. These people do not have to read/watch a news segment fifteen times, then have someone interpret that newsclip before understanding the point. I can see why you would think most people are as slow as you. Comprehension comes very slowly for you. Maybe one day you will rise to level of comprehension of normal people. Until then, know that it doesn't take nearly as long for most to comprehend and discuss topics as it does for you.

Wow. You should be embarrassed beyond belief for posting this trash. Gullible doesn't apply to Trump supporters, as evidenced in your post. Would you like to discuss all of the misguided and downright false accusations of this post? Of course you won't. But TDS is still alive and kicking. And by the way, have you bought a painting from Hunter Biden yet? They only go for half a million dollars. And you don't even have to disclose your name when making the purchase. Is this the fake news you speak of? Or is this an example of excusing unethical behavior? Do you idolize Hunter or Joe...or Jill? What other unethical behaviors have you excused today? My body my choice? Does injecting yourself show your allegiance to Biden? Do you idolize Tony Fauci? All of a sudden I realized the "Trumper" definition describes you ladybug33. Did you realize you were a "Joeber". I bet you are guilty of everything in the definition. Care to discuss?

What is a Trumper? You do realize everyone laughs at you, directly at you, when you post. How you can maintain a self-perceived level of superiority in the face of thunderous laughter is truly amazing. And you had the nerve to call others delusional.