Englebert

Ooh, nice retort. Did a third grader write that for you. Now get back to your whine fest. Entertain me some more.

Is it possible for someone to whine more? No, the answer is definitely no.

This is the very definition of "projection". I figured I would let you know why I"m laughing at you.

Nobody calls people that try to criticize Trump a POS...we just laugh at them, then feel sorry for them due to their TDS affliction. It's pretty obvious to ...ooops, nevermind. Nice to see your Trump-hating buddy has joined your whine party. Makes this forum all the more entertaining, or sad. Keep the wallow fest going. It's fun to watch and laugh. Maybe Maxine Watters will join in.

Nobody is pretending Trump was a saint. Nobody is ignoring Trump's faults. Everyone on here has acknowledged how rude and crude he can be at times. TDS must have caused you to ignore all of those posts, along with all of the posts documenting the TDS overwhelming the airwaves. Seems like you missed a ton of those posts. It's obvious you are still playing the game. At least I hope so. 0-32. Destroyed race relations. Destroyed his own record-setting economy. That whole list is comical.

TDS is really not good for your emotional well-being, but it does produce some hillarious posts. I'm starting to think that you are just "yanking our chains". It's not really conceivable that someone can actually be this unhinged. The hatred espoused must be a joke. Okay, you fooled me. You win. Can we now go back to semi-rational discussions.

Yep, you sound just like Maxine Waters and many of the unhinged Liberals. Everything is Trump's fault...everything...regardless of any other factors. Just like everything was Bush's fault. Just like everything was Reagan's fault. Simple playbook for simple minds.

Ignoring the clown show all around I see. TDS can be blinding to even the most obvious things...obviously. Ask Maxine Waters about her clown antics brought on by TDS. Y'all might find commonality.

This is not a reply to you Bullets, just a rant I want to expound upon my previous post. You got me riled up...in a good way. I think I can make my point clearer. If Trump would have "abdicated his thrown" for whatever reason the first week into his presidency, Mike Pence would have assumed the role. Pence's moral/social standing is impeccable. If Pence would have enacted the same exact policies as Trump, I have absolutely no doubt, repeat, absolutely no doubt, that the same character assassinations would have commenced upon him. Lies, fake conspiracies, fake accusations would have been just as rampant. (See Brett Kavanaugh.) Pence's policy successes would have been ignored/buried per Liberal playbook. Through these unconscionable attacks, the Liberal media would have mobilized the anti-"GOP" vote no matter who was at the helm. History has shown this clear as day to me. It is even worse now. Watch how the media treats politicians differently based on party. Watch which scandals based on evidence get buried, and which scandals "go viral" based on zero credible evidence, you know...anonymous sources backed up by biased "experts". It has come to pass, it will come again.

I never get bent out of shape, unless you go in the gutter...then I start playing. (You know I'm not referring to you.) You are conflating the issue. I'm not apologizing at all for Trump's tweets/actions. In fact, I didn't like many of them, hated some. I liked that he did punch back when a punch was thrown at him. Probably because McCain, Romney, Bush never fought back against the punches (lies) thrown at them. What I'm doing is putting less weight on his tweets/personal actions and judging him more on his policy results. You are putting more weight on his tweets/personal actions than I do to evaluate the man. That's a slight but very common difference in philosophy. Everyone has their own set of weights. But I'm definitely not apologizing for him. I will defend him for the media outrage that was perpetrated on him. Some of it was deserved because of his own actions, but most of it was just pure hatred by the Liberals. This has been their tactic (see Romney, McCain, Bush, Bush, and Reagan), but it was ramped up ten fold for Trump. I found that unacceptable and am disgusted by it. If the media would have bashed him for his bad behavior, but also treated him fairly for his policy successes, then he would have won in a landslide. He did not doom his candidacy, he was railroaded by the media. The media mobilized the Democrat voters through lies. Those lies against him, or anyone, is unacceptable to me. And I definitely want to make that clear to as many as possible. The next GOP candidate will be accused of every immoral action known to man. The media/Liberals now know they can get away with this ratcheted strategy because it worked so well on Trump. We actually have people that voted for an incompetent fool because the media trashed a very, very successful incumbent. Social media tech was complicit and an active participant in the hijacking of the election, and will ramp it up even more in the next election. So no, no apologies, only a realistic view of poor actions from both sides, weighted appropriately.

I believed you. LOL He has a history of punching then tucking tail and running, only to return like he still has some semblance of dignity. It's actually comical.

Who are the "Trump apologists"? Who are the ones defending his mean tweets? As petulant as Joe Biden acts now, can you imagine how he would react if the media treated him like they do Trump? Talk about "bigly" petulance. Do you think the media will go after the GOP candidate (whoever it may be) with every derogatory, unsavory, unethical accusation known to man? And yet, somehow Trump will still get the blame.

I posed this question in this forum a few years ago. Would it be legal for Texas to put illegal aliens on a bus and drop them off in Washington DC? I don't remember if I got an answer. Can Abbott legally use State resources to transport illegals to other states? Can Abbott legally use privately donated resources to transport illegals to other states? Can private citizens use private resources to transport illegals to other states at the request of the State? Does consent of the illegal matter? If the answer to the above questions is yes, do the illegals have to be willing participants. If say, Abbott loaded up a bus of illegals and told them they were headed to Washington DC, and one, some or all of the illegals said they did not want to go there, can he legally still send them? This kind of harkens back to the topic of whether or not States can kick a U.S. citizen out of their state.

I wonder if that was one of the embedded FBI agents chunking that fire extinguisher. Are you still trying to peddle the debunked narrative that Brian Sicknick was murdered by having his head bashed in with a fire extinguisher...like you did just recently? If the summer riots were mostly peaceful, this was comparatively a church service.

Trump has been under an IRS audit since before he took the presidential oath. Has anyone complained? It's comical how you think you have the capacity and skills to judge others. Then again, stereotyping doesn't require much skill.

Tell what you think? Were the peaceful protesters donning masks to conceal their identity while carrying frozen water bottles? Were they carrying sticks, bats, or other things? Did these people's attire resemble the protesters that burned, looted, and pillaged buildings last summer? Yeah, we can ignore all of that. Let's focus solely on skin color. Were any of the protesters that were of a different skin color blocked from entering, while those of the "correct" skin color (as you imply) ushered in? Please explain your rationale for focusing on skin color.

If a person is still perpetuating the resoundingly debunked fire extinguisher narrative, maybe that person should shy away from commenting on any Jan. 6 topic.

Wow, unhinged jibberish at it's finest. I'm almost in disbelief at how thoughtless this post is. Come on man...you can do so much better. You forgot to mention Trump didn't want his kids going to school in a racial jungle. Oh wait, maybe that was Biden's long time friend and confidant Sen Robert Byrd. Or maybe it was Joe himself. So much material...it's hard to keep track. But let's keep the focus on Trump's racist acts. What specifically were those again?

Name specifics of Trumps abhorent behavior, then apply your same "abhorrence" standard to Hillary and Biden. The difference is remarkably negligible. But you won't apply the same standard. You magnify Trump's faults ten fold over other's similiar behavior. It is glaringly obvious in your posts. And like I've stated previously, the media has applied your same double standards to Trump, accusing him of every ethical crime imaginable. Apparently they got you hook, line, and sinker. So let us start a list of Trump's unethical abhorent behavior you deem unacceptable. Then we can debate on whether you apply those same judgmental standards equally.

I almost forget...stereotype much? Who are these people you speak of? Are you describing any particular person on this board? Do any Conservatives on this board exemplify your fantastical definition of a blind Trump supporter? If not, please explain the difference between any Conservative on this board versus the millions of who you label blind Trump supporters. Can we label Biden/Dem supporters in the same fashion, you know, double standards brought on by different expectations. Would you like to continue to embarrass yourself? (This last statement is just a siren call for the other, less competent Trump hater to join the fray.)

You just keep getting worse. No, 95% of that stuff was false. Trump was accused of being a racist easily over 100,000 times by the media in the first month of his tenure (very, very, VERY conservative estimate). And as you well know, it was a lie (a lie you brush off or just refuse to acknowledge). Just that fact alone should tell you about the media. It's is amazing and very disappointing that your hatred for the man blinds you from obvious facts. Just another tidbit on your wild claims brought on by TDS. White supremacists, the few left that you can find, universally supported Bush...according to the media, especially craphole racists like the Southern Poverty Law Center. Refute that fact! We currently have more members of BLM and Antifa than the KKK running wild in the United States. Which politician do they support? Will you chastise Biden/Dems for "accepting" (coveting) support of BLM. Please explain your rationale for blindness on one side. I have a feeling you are suffering from the racism of low expectations...except "racism" in this case are the Dems. I can accept that, but you have gone so overboard that it is embarrassing for you. Blind hatred would be laughable if it didn't affect such good people. It's amazing that you bring up Christianity to chastise Trump/supporters, but will refuse to acknowledge Biden and Dems "support" (or lack of) of Christianity. This is obvious. Why do you do this? See paragraph above. It is absolutely baffling that practically everything you show as support for your hatred of Trump is exemplified and personified twice as much by the Democrats. Having knowledge of this fact, you still attempt to chastise Trump and supporters, but turn a blind eye to worse behavior by Dems. See two paragraphs above. It's obvious. Your double standards are glaring. Now, let's address the power of the media. If I could convince the media to label you a pedophile, and the media capitulates by running this narrative 24/7, how long do you think you could last on this board? Truth doesn't matter. Your objections, past history, moral turpitude will be on trial. Social media will ban all dissenting viewpoints/evidence. Do you think you could survive? How fired up will your supporters, who know the truth, be to defend you? The answer is very, very obvious.

It's really a shame that some refuse to see the big picture and evaluate who really deserves the blame. It really is a shame, and a huge, huge disappointment...because of the obvious.

Let's see: 95% to 99% non-stop negative coverage. Omission of coverage on positive things...even spun to make them negative. False accusations and flat out lies bombarding the airwaves 24/7. Nobody can survive that type of character assassination...not even the Pope. Trump deserves some credit for some negative coverage, but if he would have had fair and honest press coverage then he would have won in a land slide. But let's put all of the blame on one man's actions instead of the obvious "collusion" perpetrated by the media. "Obvious" is not nearly a strong enough word. I can predict it now. The next GOP presidential candidate will be label by the media as: racist, homophobic, a threat to LBGT (whatever the other letters are), a threat to all "minorities" (including women), misogynistic, a firm supporter of White supremacy, a bully, zenophobic, etc. This will be true despite the race or gender of the candidate. Anyone want to take this bet? This is the Democrat playbook, executed to the hilt against Trump. And it worked. We actually have intelligent people right here on this very board that fell for the character assassination. The Dems will continue this strategy. So again, would anyone like to bet on whether these accusations will be levied? (This bet coming from someone that doesn't gamble.)

Quit derailing topics with your attempts at personal insults. Either contribute or stay off. It's that simple.

Another worthless post meant only to deride. Do you take pleasure in derailing your own topic? Do you think we should put any stock in the analysis of someone thoroughly debilitated by TDS?