Englebert

What he said was not close to your interpretation. He jokingly said he was "gonna say sex", thus making you a wholesale liar. And a dumb liar at that. And thus, a pure Liberal. He was joking. Only an evil hearted, blind, hate-filled Liberal could interpret that as fact. The case you are trying to make is false, you know it is false, thus a lie. Care to keep lying? We know you will. Please put the link up about him saying he "would date his daughter". I want to call you out on that one also.

Are you really that dense? Ooops, I keep forgetting to look at the poster's name. You really are! Defend your last sentence, or be deemed the liar you are. Well, you have already lied relentlessly on this board. Are you sure you want to add one more lie to your resume? Your move liar!

It's a shame for us that you don't feel shame when lying about people you claim are liars. Who is the real "sick dude"?

You deflect on what your solution would be. How predictable. Is four days worth trillions of dollars? The northern states lose power all the time due to the cold...resulting in lives lost. The northern states lose lives anytime they have a heat wave. How much should they spend on air conditioning every home? How much should Texas spend on ensuring your snowflake existence has the power to make smores when the temperature drops below freezing? You've bragged on this forum multiple times about how well off financially you are. Why did you and your family not go to Cancun to escape the cold? That's what smart people who can afford it would have done. My generator kept me warm and cozy for the couple of days, so I had no need to join the affluent crowd you claim to belong to. So again, how much should the Texas lawmakers extort from Texas taxpayers to make sure every government dependent person does not suffer any undue hardships for a few days? Please give us a figure. Once you atone for you silly first complaint on Abbott, maybe we can then move on to the next two braindead points you made. History has shown you will refuse to partake in this adult conversation. History has shown you will resort to deflection and personal attacks. InMagaWeTrust is not smiling right now...and neither are you. Coincidence?

So how is the electrical grid in Gilmer? Should we spend trillions of dollars making sure 20 something degree weather every 25 years doesn't shut it down. What would Abbott say? What do you say? Do you think you can deflect to avoid providing fodder for the forum? InMagaWeTrust is known for this tactic. He would not answer the question either. So let's see...will you break from the InMagaWeTrust profile and actually answer a question, or will you continually act exactly like him?

Do I dare inquire as to your conclusion as to how "Liberals own" me? Are you really trying this tactic? I remember InMagaWeTrust acting this same exact way...and he actually claimed he wasn't the previous poster that was banned. Sound familiar? Of course it does.

See above ImagaWeTrust. You deserve it.

You definitely need to work on your analytical skills. Then again, Liberals are known for accusing others of what they themselves are guilty of. So more proof positive of your Liberal sheeple inclusion.

The ol' "both sides do it". Man, you are a Liberal sheeple. The desperation for redemption is nauseating.

Who is "y'all"? Your stereotyping is definitely the source of "funny". What's the percentage of babies required to be murdered because of rape? Is the number so high that adoption is not an option for those that had no say in their conception...and deserve the ultimate penaly?

You sound bitter....just like InMagaWeTrust. Why do you think "D's" would change their vote due to a Supreme Court decision based on States rights and constitutional law? That was your assessment of your own brethren. I agreed with that assessment but simply asked why you feel this way. Why do you refuse to answer? So again, if someone changed their vote because of this Supreme Court decision, would you classify that person as a low information voter?

So again, you refuse to answer the pertinent question by deflection and personal attacks..but somehow I am the clown. Yep...proof positive you are through and through a Liberal sheeple. Answer the simple question and we can move on to your deflective additives. But you won't...because you can't. You are funny.

I'm going to disagree with you. Liberals think they have so many great ideas as long as someone else will pay for them. LOL At least InMagaWeTrust is not protesting his Liberal sheeple persona now. Even he knows after his latest posts he has to own the moniker.

Again, you started this by saying the "D's" will vote against State's rights and constitutional law. I agreed with your assessment as "D's" being low information voters. You now try to justify your assessment by saying that millions of babies being murdered is okay as long as the low information voters get their way on an issue that hasn't even been debated. And adult conversation is obviously not anywhere near your purview. So one more time...will you finally admit that anyone that protests against a Supreme Court decision that is grounded in States rights and constitutional law is a representative of a low information voter? (It's funny. You have the audacity to think you can wiggle your way out of it by deflection...which is hilariously juvenile. Bless your little heart.)

I actually took the time to answer. Man do I feel like a fool. I need to read the poster name before commenting.

So, in your mind, the last few posts in which you adamantly called out "D's" as being low information voters, has led you to this post. It looks like you just outed yourself. You are a Liberal...incapable of having an adult conversation. Shall I ask again? What "right" did anyone take"? No common ground means you cannot back up your statements...and I can. Yes, that is obviously no common ground.

Grid? Seriously? Man are you a Liberal sheeple. Would you prefer we spend trillions of dollars on a grid that that might not go down once in 25 years? Yes, you are a sheeple so we know the answer. Please give your intelligent resolution to your delusional "problems". States education? What complaints do you have with Abbot on this? (Hint: the Liberal sheeple answers will only draw laughter...so that leaves you with nothing...but let's see what you come up with.) States Healthcare? Again, see above. What do you propose? Please, please answer so we can laugh at your Liberal response.

I take your blatant omission of answering the pertinent question as a "guilty as charged" verdict. Don't worry, it was predictable. What "right" did anyone take? Is contraception a right? Should we have a debate or just turn a blind eye so the low information voter will not be offended? Is gay marriage a right? See above. Can you answer the question on whether or not you described the "D's" as low information voters? Is it too hard for you to admit because you feel a "brotherhood" with your own kind?

This is an accurate but very, very sad evaluation of the "D's". How can a person switch their vote based on a Supreme Court decision that puts power back into the hands of the people and is grounded in Constitutional law. Low information voter is the only logical conclusion. Agree?

There is a fine line that distinguishes who gets to make law by legislative process or by executive fiat. The ultimate problem is that nobody can define and establish that line. TVC gave some great examples of legal fiat. Examples of overreach would be the something like the Beaumont mayor decreeing that (s)he doesn't want 14 and 15 year old kids in high school, so all Beaumont schools must keep these students in Junior High. Or maybe the Parks and Wildlife Department decreeing that JetSkis are no longer allowed on any Texas waterways. Or that the police chief decrees motorcycles are too dangerous and therefore outlawed in Beaumont. There is a line, but who gets to decide? This issue will never be settled. A case by case ruling with very limited precedence is all we should be able to hope for. I frankly don't see this case as blockbuster. Very important, but not enduring precedence.

Smart move. Just like InMagaWeTrust would have done. See you on the next topic.

I take that as "I'm a clown that can't debate without exposing myself as the clown I wish to be, so I just call others clowns". Did that accurately describe your position? It's funny you would run from such a simple task. How hard is it to list your preferred positions that a president should espouse? I guess you can hear that gutter calling you. It might be wise for you to run instead of embarrassing yourself again. And just like InMagaWeTrust, you will run then show up on another topic spewing your same garbage. I will call you out, and you will run again. On the off chance you try to debate, you will immediately go straight to the gutter, which I will begrudgingly follow...embarrassing both of us. The exact same thing as InMagaWeTrust. If you are not him, you definitely could be his twin brother. Ooops, I should have broken this into multiple posts. You previously admitted in our last "debate" (LOL) that you didn't have the ability to follow a post with multiple sentences. You whined about how the "big" words and the length was just too much for you. (It was hard to believe your sudden revelation of honesty after all of the lies.)

What above response? The Liberal lies you listed? You can't be serious. List the characteristics and policy positions you would have wanted Trump to espouse instead of the actions he engaged in that you find repulsive. It's very simple. You seem to fancy yourself as superior to him (and everyone on this board), so this should be a simple task. Keep is classy and I will reciprocate. You go in the gutter and I will follow you...just like last time. What are you scared of? (LOL, that was rhetorical, everyone knows what you are scared of.) Even you know you don't have the ability to debate and must resort to derogatory gutter-snipe in a lame attempt to deflect from having to defend your indefensible positions. Let's see how far you get before your immaturity leaks out.

Now that you have regurgitated the Liberal lies (ones you were conned into believing), see if you can list real reasons to hate Trump? (I find it comical that you don't realize how childish you sound trying to make fun of people's names. "Conald"? Are you really stooping to that? Direct evidence you have nothing but childish antics. You are a hero to 3rd graders, while 5th graders just put the "L" handsign on their forehead. 6th graders just ignore such immaturity. Thanks for again showing your level of debating skills.) Since you have proven over and over you can't come up with anything to back your allegations, let's switch to a much simpler task...one even you should be able to complete. Please list the characteristics and policy positions you want to see in a president. Since you can't say what Trump did wrong, let's see what you think he should have done (according to you). This should be amusing.

Yes it does. That's why I posted this. I wasn't counting, but I passed around 20 police vehicles that were in pursuit. They were somewhat spread out over a few miles. I just saw this on 12newsnow.com: 2 arrested after car chase ends in Jefferson County | 12newsnow.com