Jump to content

baddog

Members
  • Posts

    30,154
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    111

Posts posted by baddog

  1. 4 minutes ago, UT alum said:

    It wasn’t an argument. It was a collection of opinions. You even went so far as to accuse me of plagiarizing your plagiarism. Can’t argue with that crazy thinking. 
    This is how the Father of our Country saw it. Read it then let’s try another debate.

    This is the hidden content, please

    So, where’s the insurrection against the Federal government in Los Angeles?

    Not leading you by the hand like big girl. You are obviously not an American if you cover for these violent rioters and looters, plus you back hamas.

  2. 16 minutes ago, UT alum said:

    This is the hidden content, please

    This is the statute Weasel used to federalize the National Guard. We are not being invaded by a foreign nation. There is no insurrection threatening our government. The LA protesters were complimented by local authorities on Thursday for keeping it orderly, so the President was having no trouble executing the laws. He used a dubious code to keep on dividing us as a nation. He is making his move to become king and you all are applauding him.

    I addressed all of your post. You addressed none of mine, and you call yourself a debater. Typical lib.

    Here’s your definition: An insurrection is a violent uprising against established authority, typically a government. It involves organized, often armed, resistance, aiming to overthrow or change the existing power structure. Insurrections can also be directed against specific laws or policies. 

  3. 30 minutes ago, UT alum said:

    Military does not have domestic enforcement power unless there is insurrection. The Weasel is using fear and prejudice to gin something up to call insurrection. It is unconstitutional to call in the military for protests. The Guard can be requested by a governor to quell riots. If the President starts making the calls, authoritarianism is right around the corner. If you don’t agree with Dear Leader, you’ll be going to jail or worse. You don’t realize what’s happening. Ignore the courts, select the journalists, threaten the judges, ignore Congress with executive orders, military parades on his birthday. I could go on. Hello. Is there anybody in there?

    Your attempt at schooling everyone has failed miserably. Look up the definition of an insurrection. Just because California has a bunch of dweebs running things, doesn’t mean Trump is not within his rights. Trump is not coming after you or me so stop with the fear mongering. It’s what the dems are good at and it has a great effect on the weak minded. Your journalists are self destructing by the droves. Couldn’t possibly be that they were wrong. You hate dictators yet you follow behind a single judge’s order. I do remember your Schumer idol threatening S.C. Judges. The military parade on Saturday was the U.S. Army’s birthday. I could go on. Stop plagiarizing my Pink Floyd reference. 
     

    So you do believe that illegals mean more than real Americans. Pick up a rock and throw it at a cop. Maybe you could loot a big screen.

  4. 40 minutes ago, UT alum said:

    It’s only the beginning, looks like. This is what will happen when the military becomes involved in civil enforcement. It’s not politics. It’s the beginning of authoritarianism and the beginning of the end of our Constitution if people like you don’t wake from your fever dreams.

    This is what happens when democrats are in control. Sanctuary cities protecting illegal criminals, when they should be protecting real Americans. Where does it say that in the Constitution? You are ate up with it.

     

  5. 1 hour ago, thetragichippy said:

    I guess we should thank the Democrats for insisting Mr. Garcia get his due process and the Obama appointed Judge Paula Xinis for requesting his return. Now he is facing human trafficking charges, which can get him 10 years per person trafficked.....and they claim 50 people.

    This is the hidden content, please

    Lmao. 

  6. 16 minutes ago, Boyz N Da Hood said:

    Surely you dont think that bothers me.... I haven't like one candidate as long as I've been eligible to vote.. hence why I ain't voted on any of them...  I dont do "lesser of 2 evils" or "they align closer with my views"...  

    Not trying to bother you. If you don’t vote, then how can you put constraints on those who run?

×
×
  • Create New...