bullets13

When Tom gets in his new truck do you think the check tire pressure light will be on? That would be pretty brilliant if Chevy under inflated the tires for him...

Crazy.

What an ending!!!

Wilson hasn't completed a pass in 22 minutes of game time

I agree with you there, PAMFAM

I think 5 wins out of 8 and one win in the tourney gets them in. That would be 21-9. Should be good enough. Plus the OT game vs Kentucky will be looked at like a win by the committee IMO

One of the arguments opponents have always had about marijuana is that it leads to harder drug use. I've always kind of attributed that to its illegality, and the fact that you have to buy it from guys who are selling harder stuff as well. I'd be interested to see what studies show on use of harder drugs in Colorado now that marijuana has been legal there for a little while.

MVP is not an abbreviation for "best player." With JJ Watt, the texans missed the playoffs. Without him, the same result, with a couple of less wins. Without Murray, i believe the cowboys can put in dunbar and still win 10-11 games and probably make the playoffs. With Rodgers, the packers made the NFC championship game. Without him, they lose several more games and miss the playoffs. Hence, Rodgers was more valuable, and consequently, so is the qb position. As great as JJ is, and I would argue he's as dominant at his position as any player has EVER been at any position, the position he plays doesn't allow him to impact the game the way skills position offensive players do. It's just the nature of the game.

Rodgers had more touchdowns and yards than romo, and 5 less interceptions. Romo had a higher completion percentage. I would have to give him the edge.

I hoped romo would get more consideration. But what Rodgers did this year was pretty phenomenal. 38 TDs to 5 INTs is hard to argue.

Wherever TVC and I decide to go when I do a ridealong with him tonight. I don't care a whole lot about this Super Bowl.

There's no way I could vote for Palin. Maybe if Biden somehow won a nomination. That's about the only scenario I can imagine it happening.

I can think of a dozen reasons why someone might chase your son, thug or not.

I heard a scientist say that deflating the balls by 2 lbs would allow a qb to depress the ball about a dime's-width more than usual. I'm not sure how accurate that statement was, just telling what I heard.

a bunch of ignorant bigots, with an elected official leading the way.

Yates officials are trying to find a way to use school numbers post-walkout to drop back down and win another couple fake basketball championships...

Glad to see this finally happening.

hahaha. that's funny.

they're crazy if they trade him. he played a few games his first year on a pretty weak team, but look at his numbers the last two years (neither a full year, but both seasons had plenty of games to show what he could do): 2013 and 2014: Overall record: 14-4 Pass Touchdowns: 40 Interceptions: 12 Rushing Yards- 331 Rushing Touchdowns- 3 There's what, about 5 teams in the league that could look at those numbers and feel like whatever they have is a better option?

I'm fine with either Harden or Curry winning it this year. it'll be nice to see a little parity in who wins the award for once.

hypothetical for you: there's a man chasing your son, trying to shoot him. a police officer has an opportunity to "disable him" or shoot to kill (really it's shoot to stop the threat, but whatever). Do you want the officer to try a more difficult shot on the suspect and try to "disable him", despite the fact that they are more likely to miss, and even if they hit him he still might be able to shoot your son? Or would you rather them shoot him center mass, where they're much more likely to hit him, but also much more likely to kill him?

[Hidden Content] white and female. made a threatening move towards officers, and was shot by 3 of them. just saying.

And if republicans will stick to this approach, they have a much better shot at maintaining the seats they've gained in the house and senate.

If republicans mistake disenfranchised voters swinging their way in individual elections as an indication that the country as a whole is interested in their conservative stances on many issues (again), then the voters will swing right back to the left in another few years.

that's what I was thinking!