bullets13

To be fair, very new technologies in monoclonal antibodies (like within the past 2-3 years) means it looks very little like monoclonal therapies of the past. So to say it's safe because it's been around 50 years is like saying the covid vaccine is safe because vaccines have been around for over 200 years. The rest of what you say makes sense.

Let's get this one back on topic. I'm trying to be patient because I think it's good for the site to have some back and forth, but when it devolves into this sort of thing it defeats the purpose. As I said a while back I'll start issuing warnings if I need to. There's nothing that's overly offensive here, but you guys certainly aren't following site rules with this conversation.

On a thread on another site many of the same folks who are Reagan-level anti-vax were talking about having gotten the monoclonal infusion or being in favor of it. When I pointed out that the infusion has many of the characteristics that they used as arguments against the vaccine (new technology with unknown long term side effects, artificially made in a lab, not FDA approved) they got a little irrational.

Of course it is. I wasn’t telling them they couldn’t. Merely pointing it out. Nobody likes to be shown their own hypocrisy.

Brought this up on another site and a lot of people got upset. But the science itself is extremely close to that used in the vaccine that the same people refuse to take.

Finally stringing a few good weeks together after an awful start

Calvert 48, Chester 28

Lovelady 24 Mount Enterprise 0

Garrison 31 SA 30

Elkhart 29 Trinity 28

Diboll 41 Crockett 0

Coldspring 34 Westwood 13

Anahuac 32 Buna 12

Madisonville 52 Center 40

Kingwood Park 46 Santa Fe 3

TC 35 Dayton 7

Magnolia West 49 Porter 7

Final, according to DC

Carrollton POP 66 Westbury Christian 21

Oakwood 63, Apple Springs 0

Shelbyville 30 Joaquin 36

New Waverly 30 CC 13

Lufkin 27, Cleveland 16

Tenaha 49 Cushing 6

Final score?