-
Posts
84,450 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
554
Everything posted by AggiesAreWe
-
Will Silsbee girls basketball ever get back on track?
AggiesAreWe replied to BADSANTA's topic in SETXsports Archived Threads
[quote name="Cat22" post="1307362" timestamp="1350939645"] [quote author=BADSANTA link=topic=105043.msg1306865#msg1306865 date=1350913919] Will they ever become a contender to win district and make long runs in then playoff and to state like the 90's? [/quote] The problem I've seen with Silsbee and this is from the outside looking in, is the interest in girls basketball is not there. [b] Silsbee has some of the best female athletes in the district, but they don't play basketball. Look at volleyball, softball and especially track, if some of those girls would play basketball then they would be in the hunt for the district championship every year.[/b] [/quote] ;) :-X :-X :-X :-X -
ATTENTION YOUTH SPORTS POSTERS!!!!
AggiesAreWe replied to AggiesAreWe's topic in SETXsports Archived Threads
[quote name="Gucci" post="1307333" timestamp="1350938073"] [quote author=AggiesAreWe link=topic=105079.msg1307313#msg1307313 date=1350937279] This forum is ojn borrowed time unless you guys clean it up. No more personal attacks or bashing!!! If this forum continues to go down the path that it is currently on, this forum will no longer exist on this website. It's your choice to make. You have been warned. [/quote]No disrespect sir but are you also warning the posters, including yourself on the highschool football and basketball forums which are also youth sports. [/quote] Yes -
This forum is on borrowed time unless you guys clean it up. No more personal attacks or bashing!!! If this forum continues to go down the path that it is currently on, this forum will no longer exist on this website. It's your choice to make. You have been warned.
-
Dave Campbell's TF @dctf Per data from @corbettsmithDMN, Class 6A is not the 6A people have discussed for years. 6A will be the old 5A. 1A is just dividing. #txhsfb
-
[quote name="PN-G bamakid" post="1307078" timestamp="1350924269"] [quote author=AggiesAreWe link=topic=105056.msg1307068#msg1307068 date=1350923905] [quote author=GCMPats link=topic=105056.msg1307044#msg1307044 date=1350923159] The UIL has approved a 6A classification for the 2014 alignment. Corbett Smith @corbettsmithDMN 6A is here. UIL creates a sixth division, splitting Class 1A Division I and II. This goes in effect for 2014 alignment Retweeted by Texas HS Football [/quote] That is not all they approved. First, about the 6A. All it really does is change the name of each classification except for 1A DII. Starting in 2014, what we now know as 5A will be called 6A, 4A will be 5A, 3A will be 4A, 2A will be 3A, 1A DI will be 2A and 1A DII will be just 1A. Second, UIL did pass to add a 4th team to playoffs in all team sports in 3A and 2A starting next season. Also, UIL passed referendum for 3A supts. to vote on making the current 3A football districts to DI and DII districts like 2A and 1A. If passed by supts, this will start next season as well. UIL has voted to eliminate 1 tourney from basketball, baseball and softball. Starting next season a team can only play 2 tourneys and not 3. [/quote] You mean we finally get a 6A classification and it won't [b]fix the discrepancy in enrollment numbers and talent pools we've been dealing with in the 4A and 5A playoffs?[/b] Please tell me this is a back-door way of making a [b]real[/b] 6A classification over time. [/quote] That's what making DI and DII took care of. In order to do what you are asking, you would make 6A a mega classification with very few schools. Travel for district games would be terrible and completely ridiculous in some cases.
-
[quote name="GCMPats" post="1307044" timestamp="1350923159"] The UIL has approved a 6A classification for the 2014 alignment. Corbett Smith @corbettsmithDMN 6A is here. UIL creates a sixth division, splitting Class 1A Division I and II. This goes in effect for 2014 alignment Retweeted by Texas HS Football [/quote] That is not all they approved. First, about the 6A. All it really does is change the name of each classification except for 1A DII. Starting in 2014, what we now know as 5A will be called 6A, 4A will be 5A, 3A will be 4A, 2A will be 3A, 1A DI will be 2A and 1A DII will be just 1A. Second, UIL did pass to add a 4th team to playoffs in all team sports in 3A and 2A starting next season. Also, UIL passed referendum for 3A supts. to vote on making the current 3A football districts to DI and DII districts like 2A and 1A. If passed by supts, this will start next season as well. UIL has voted to eliminate 1 tourney from basketball, baseball and softball. Starting next season a team can only play 2 tourneys and not 3.
-
[quote name="BADSANTA" post="1306854" timestamp="1350913278"] What ever happened to the kid from HF who was trucking all the Silsbee kids on YouTube. Thi k it was a junior high game. He looked liked he could be a force for HF. Has he graduated? [/quote] I believe you are speaking of Kendrick King. He is a freshmen this year, playing on varsity. Silsbee will see him Friday night but I doubt he will "truck" anyone that night. This ain't Jr. High ball. ::)
-
Offense rush/avg. pass/avg. tot/avg. points/avg. 1. Buna (2-2) 1300/325 152/38 1452/363 96/24 2. WO-S (3-0) 645/215 429/143 1074/358 147/49 3. Silsbee (3-0) 526/175.3 504/168 1030/343.3 137/45.7 4. Orangefield(2-2) 1204/301 25/6.25 1229/307.25 80/20 5. Bridge City(2-1) 484/161.3 315/105 799/266.3 78/26 6. Ham-Fann (0-4) 480/120 544/136 1024/256 28/7 7. Hard-Jeff (0-3) 130/43.3 358/119.3 488/162.7 27/9 Defense 1. WO-S (3-0) 218/72.7 179/59.7 397/132.3 0/0 2. Silsbee (3-0) 427/140.3 118/39.3 545/181.7 37/12.3 3. Buna (2-2) 457/114.25 651/162.75 1108/277 106/26.5 4. Bridge City(2-1) 544/181.3 312/104 856/285.3 69/23 5. Hard-Jeff (0-3) 780/260 113/37.7 893/297.7 90/30 6. Orangefield(2-2) 850/212.5 668/167 1518/379.5 144/36 7. Ham-Fann (0-4) 1519/379.5 216/54 1735/433.75 128/32
-
Will Silsbee girls basketball ever get back on track?
AggiesAreWe replied to BADSANTA's topic in SETXsports Archived Threads
[quote name="BADSANTA" post="1306865" timestamp="1350913919"] Will they ever become a contender to win district and make long runs in then playoff and to state like the 90's? [/quote] Since "ever" is a long time, I say yes. Now if you are talking in the immediate future, well then my answer would probably be different. ;) -
[quote name="MBaller#1" post="1306813" timestamp="1350907782"] Will these polls be released today [/quote] Yes. TABC should be releasing them some time today.
-
***SETXsports HIGH SCHOOL FOOTBALL RANKINGS - WEEK 8***
AggiesAreWe replied to WOSgrad's topic in SETXsports Archived Threads
[quote name="mytwocents" post="1306799" timestamp="1350905039"] Okay got a question. [b]This ranking is based on how far you think a team will go in the playoffs right? [/b]Well I wonder how far vidor will jump up when central makes it because vidor's playoff road gets a lot easier when that happens. [/quote] What gave you that idea? -
Oakwood at High Island 10/27
AggiesAreWe replied to Mr. Buddy Garrity's topic in SETXsports Archived Threads
[quote name="Mr. Buddy Garrity" post="1306513" timestamp="1350854220"] 3pm kickoff Saturday, anybody going to this [b][u]small school game[/u][/b]? This needs to be broadcasted IMO with Soulja as the color analyst ;) [/quote] I will be attending this game Saturday. Probably will not broadcast but will blog. Of course, will not rule out a broadcast just yet. ;) Plus, gives me a good reason to go eat at Stingaree's in Crystal Beach. ;D -
How the SETXsports ranked teams fared in week 7
AggiesAreWe replied to AggiesAreWe's topic in SETXsports Archived Threads
Hmmmm.... saw the ranking results that will be posted later tonight. Interesting.... ;) ;D -
[quote name="jkbtjc53" post="1306323" timestamp="1350834779"] Stangs cover the spread and win by 50 and they pitch a shut-out. [/quote] What spread?
-
[quote name="BigRed42" post="1306312" timestamp="1350834117"] [quote author=PhatMack19 link=topic=104998.msg1306310#msg1306310 date=1350833814] [b]Team [/b] [b]Record[/b] [b]Remaining games[/b] Nederland 4 0 Ozen, @ Lum, Central Vidor 3 1 PN-G, Liv, @ LC-M Livingston 3 1 Central, @ Vidor, PN-G LC-M 2 2 Lumberton, @ Central, Vidor Central 2 2 @ Livingston, LC-M, @ Ned Ozen 1 3 @ Nederland, @ PN-G, Lum PN-G 1 3 @ Vidor, Ozen, @ Liv Lumberton 0 4 @ LC-M, Ned, @ Ozen Who gets in? LC-M seems to have the easiest path. Central vs. LC-M could be for a playoff berth in 2 weeks, but they both need to win this week first. [/quote] [b]Team [/b] [b]Record[/b] [b]Remaining games[/b] Nederland 7 0 Ozen(W), @ Lum(W), Central(W) Vidor 6 1 PN-G(W), Liv(W), @ LC-M(W) Livingston 5 2 Central(W), @ Vidor(L), PN-G(W) LC-M 4 3 Lumberton(W), @ Central(W), Vidor(L) Central 2 5 @ Livingston(L), LC-M(L), @ Ned(L) [b]Ozen 3 4 @ Nederland(L), @ PN-G(L), Lum(W)[/b] PN-G 2 5 @ Vidor(L), Ozen(W), @ Liv(L) Lumberton 0 7 @ LC-M(L), Ned(L), @ Ozen(L) This is how I see it ending up [/quote] I am trying to figure out how you have Ozen finishing 3-4 in district when you have them losing to Ned and PNG. Ozen is currently 1-3 and with your scenario they would finish 2-5.
-
5A-3A 1. Dayton (8-0) defeated Porter 49-0 2. WO-S (7-0) defeated Orangefield 54-0 3. PAM (6-1) Off 4. Summer Creek (7-0) defeated Humble 49-5 5. Nederland (6-1) defeated PN-G 37-12 6. La Porte (6-1) defeated Deer Park 20-16 7. Vidor (6-1) defeated Central 40-21 8. Silsbee (6-1) Off 9. Jasper (6-1) defeated Diboll 45-0 10. Barbers Hill (6-1) Off 11. Coldspring (6-2) defeated #13 Huffman 60-21 12. Center (7-1) lost to Carthage 45-29 13. Huffman (5-2) lost to #11 Coldspring 60-21 14. Crosby (4-3) defeated CE King 24-0 15. Livingston (3-4) defeated Lumberton 55-14 others receiving votes: Baytown Lee (4-3) lost to Pearland Dawson 33-7 Central (2-5) lost to #7 Vidor 40-21 Cleveland (6-2) defeated Liberty 49-7 LC-M (3-4) defeated Ozen 21-15 2A-Private 1. Newton (7-0) defeated #8 Kountze 64-10 2. West Sabine (6-1) lost to Alto 40-26 3. San Augustine (5-2) defeated Shelbyville 35-12 4. Woodville (4-3) defeated Hardin 34-7 5. East Chambers (5-2) defeated Kirbyville 42-27 6. Corrigan-Camden (3-4) lost to New Waverly 35-14 7. Deweyville (5-2) defeated Anderson-Shiro 44-13 8. Kountze (5-2) lost to #1 Newton 64-10 9. Anahuac (4-3) defeated Warren 74-34 10. OCC (6-1) defeated Houston Mount Carmel 82-54 others receiving votes: Colmesneil (4-3) Off Groveton (4-3) defeated Hemphill 51-14 Hull-Daisetta (4-3) Off High Island (5-1) defeated Chester 58-6 Legacy (5-2) lost to Cypress Christian 26-6
-
[Hidden Content]