LumRaiderFan

Like I said, clueless.

Apparently those unnamed sources carry more weight than the actual source, lol.
He’s absolutely ate up with it.

A message from your Daddy T to you with Love.
 
 
 
 

😂
 
 
 

This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  

Like I’ve said before, libs take their right to kill babies very serious.

👏🙏

So go along and do what you have to do to make sure you get the votes, the unborn kids be damned.
You, sir, are the ultimate sheep.

How did we manage all the unwanted babies and crime before 1973?
smh

So go along and do what you have to do to make sure you get the votes, the unborn kids be damned.
You, sir, are the ultimate sheep.

That is the exact thought I had when you see some of the reactions on this, I remember hearing that there would be blood running in the streets if concealed carry was passed.

Hey y'all, watch this! (in Russian)

How did we manage all the unwanted babies and crime before 1973?
smh

This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up

I think the fools that voted for him are worse, they're still here, still voting, and no smarter than they were when they voted for this idiot.

Biden is getting the same treatment from the right wing media, he deserves it all for his past and the way he's handling things 

Not sure what is worse, the fact that this idiot is president or the people who voted for him.

Incorrect, simply google policies Trump put in place day one to fix the disaster from Obama.  Remember, Obama was the genius that said 7-8% unemployment was the “new normal “.
Trump called him out on that and proved him wrong. 

Trump got hit by Covid, take 5 minutes to read the link, these are all policies imposed by Biden that directly influenced energy costs, and decisions only someone that was anti-fossil fuels would make, the are non-sensical policies AFTER we were energy independent.
Fuel costs go up everything goes up, Biden did that singlehandedly, no help from Trump.

This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up

Supreme Court rulings generally start with a syllabus which gives a relatively brief description of the decision. The syllabus might be 1 to 3 pages.
Then it goes on into as many as 15 pages describing how they came to the official conclusion. In addition to the official ruling, some justices may issue a concurring opinion meaning that they agree with a ruling but for different reasons. Then the justices on the losing side may issue a dissent describing why they disagree.
The syllabus in this case concludes with this paragraph:
The constitutional right to bear arms in public for self-defense is not “a second-class right, subject to an entirely different body of rules than the other Bill of Rights guarantees.” McDonald, 561 U. S., at 780 (plurality opinion). The exercise of other constitutional rights does not require individuals to demonstrate to government officers some special need. The Second Amendment right to carry arms in public for self- defense is no different. New York’s proper-cause requirement violates the Fourteenth Amendment by preventing law-abiding citizens with ordinary self-defense needs from exercising their right to keep and bear arms in public. 
 
It clearly says that other constitutional rights do not require you to justify why you need them. Why should the second amendment?

SCOTUS ruled that people have the right to carry handguns in self-defense and a state cannot set a restriction that the person has to prove a need.

This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Reading the actual case was just released, it appears that states like New Jersey, New York and California will now have to an act of law that requires them to issue a license to people who wish to carry handguns in self-defense. They overturned a New York law that says they don’t have to issue a license unless you can prove a need. The ruling was that the Second Amendment does not require you to prove why you need self defense. 

I feel dumber every time I get on here. 

Sorry if you can't understand what success means, you idea of success is whether or not someone can sway snowflakes and moderates to pay attention and vote for the interest of the country.
If folks would have re-elected Trump, we wouldn't be in the mess we're in now.
You can deny it all you want, but it simply shows your ignorance of current events.

Always deflecting. I thought you were middle of the road.