LumRaiderFan
-
Posts
16,499 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
77
Posts posted by LumRaiderFan
-
-
9 minutes ago, OlDawg said:
I was waiting to see how long it took for those who said they didn’t trust a single source—or the government—for data, to realize the X post was partially created using government data.
Truth can come from any source, as can misinformation.
I think most posts are made for discussion, not necessarily to claim without a doubt they are 100% accurate.
Back to my original point, the debate shouldn’t end just because someone doesn’t like the source.
-
18 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:
I meant is it a big deal on who that guy hired?
Should we be surprised?
Not much surprises me when it comes to democrats, but I gotta admit, this one did a little bit.
I never expected New Yorkers to embrace government dependency so much as to vote someone like this in, and he was very honest upfront about his intentions.
- baddog and AggiesAreWe
-
2
-
52 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:
New York elected the man.
That's what they get.
Is this a big deal?
That the largest city in the US elected a democratic socialist (communist) as their mayor is a very big deal. Soon we’re gonna see just how big.
Remember all the dimwits that were surprised at the direction biden took the country, same folks will be shocked, once again.
-
4 minutes ago, Porter said:
No kidding. Look at all the media and government officials that pushed the Russia Hoax and no one of any importance that has been held accountable. Smh
Yep, and the covid lies.
-
8 minutes ago, UT alum said:
So? The pretty skirt Trump used to attempte Comey’s isn’t a prosecutor. Why should unfamiliarity with a job bother you?
No comment on Mamdani’s pick, you know, what the thread is about.
Every response of yours is about Trump, no matter what.
And from the guy that hates whataboutisms, lol.
-
14 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:
I hear ya.
Maybe reagan should have posted that data from a verified media source/govt. entity instead of a social media influencer. You know, those folks that try to INFLUENCE people. lol
Not sure there is such a thing as a single verified source that I would trust, certainly not one from the government or mainstream media.
There are lots of folks on social media that provide solid information backed up by research that lots of folks haven’t heard of.
-
2 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:
See, that's the thing. I am not necessarily disagreeing with the data. Could very much be true and likely pretty close. (see baddog's post above).
I just don't get how some here take it as truth just because they agree with it or it supports their side or comes from anyone on their side.
Until baddog's post, no one was willing to verify Mila Joy. You guys liked that it came from "one of yours" so therefore no reason to dispute,
That's my point.
Just because someone doesn’t challenge a post doesn’t mean they necessarily agree with it, not enough time in the day.
How would verifying who Mila Joy is validate or disqualify hard numbers?
Argue the content, not the source.
-
5 minutes ago, Porter said:
I don’t disagree with you but if the source bothers you then do some research and enlighten us all.
This is an opinion platform. Whatever is posted is a good starting point for an individual to do their own research if they are curious enough to know if it is true. Left or Right everyone should do their own verification.
Agree 100%, been saying this forever.
Don’t agree with a post, prove it wrong instead of wagging your finger at the source.
-
16 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:
I guess my point is has this forum come to the fact that one can post anything from anyone and it's assumed to be fact depending on which side of the fence one stands on?
When this forum starts posting data from someone who is just a wife/mom/MAGA/Trump supporter and that's it? Then I personally believe this forum has gone to "you know what". Same would be the case if it were opposite.
I have spoke to a few folks (both sides) over the last several months that used to post down here that have chosen not to just because it's nothing but personal attacks and bogus, nothing but opinion based data from very one sided sources.
I think this forum could be better and actually was better.
Sad to see it come to this.
No one has said take something for facts simply because they post it, that’s what you said.
I simply said don’t dismiss a post simply because you don’t know or like the source.
That’s sad.
Go to the trouble of looking into yourself and if you can prove it false, great.
And as far as the personal attacks, that’s nothing I can fix, that falls to the moderators.
-
-
3 minutes ago, Porter said:
Personally I don’t care if Elmer Fudd posted these statistics. If they are indeed true that’s very disturbing.
Exactly right, even the National Enquirer scooped big stories, Rush Limbaugh, Tiger Woods and John Edwards.
It’s easier to dismiss the source if you can’t dispute the information.
-
17 minutes ago, UT alum said:
Who is Mila Joy?
Doesn’t matter, if these aren’t facts, prove it.
-
Merry Christmas, everyone!
-
-
-
-
1 hour ago, DCT said:
You are definitely MAGA. Didn’t mean to hurt your feelings.
AI OverviewNo, Venezuela is not American land; it's a sovereign South American country, but recent political tensions, particularly from the Trump administration in late 2025, have involved claims that Venezuela "stole" U.S. oil and assets, leading to threats of blockades and intensified rhetoric, though these claims lack basis in international law. Venezuela became independent from Spain in 1830, and while U.S. companies had major oil interests before nationalization, international law affirms Venezuela's ownership of its resources.🤦♂️
-
43 minutes ago, DCT said:
I’m not listing all his bulls&@t. We currently have a thread on one that will determine his legacy.
His legacy will be a safe border, one of most important responsibilities of the federal government.
That will stand until the next democrat is elected.
-
18 minutes ago, Reagan said:
Here’s your fact checkers: By
, , and !Who says “they” are qualified to be fact checkers? Maybe biased?!
Take a look at the articles from each correspondent you listed (which I’m sure you haven’t bothered to do).
Maybe a little biased, lol.
Trump has supposedly told tens of thousands of lies, surely you guys can recall some without help from media.
-
13 hours ago, DCT said:
Wrong, all the people he pardoned for January, 6 should just about cover it along with the drug trafficker and all the con men he pardoned.
The Epstein files, the economy, healthcare, tariffs, ending 7 wars, DODGE draining the swamp. I could go but not necessary, you see the big picture.List the specific lies associated with each of those. Spell out the big picture for me.
-
6 minutes ago, nappyroots said:
you guys on this board love trump more than melania. I used to have posters of women on my walls during the 80's you guys probably have pics of trump
He’s wearing a cape in the poster I have on my wall.
-
11 minutes ago, nappyroots said:
trump has been talking about his health care plan since before his last election. But we have never seen it. Another big beautiful lie
His plan hasn’t skyrocketed premiums, but I’m sure you won’t criticize that guy.
-
The guy crapped on half the country for decades. Death doesn’t change facts.
-
25 minutes ago, DCT said:
Here’s one for giggles same source.
Early 2021, examined Trump's promotion of "the big lie" for political purposes to subvert the 2020 election, and concluded that the lie encouraged the
. The attack was cited in a resolution to . During , the house managers , , , and discussed how Trump used "the big lie" to repeatedly make the false claim the election was stolen from him. On October 7, a Senate Judiciary Committee report said that Trump attempted to use the Department of Justice to "lay the foundation of the 'Big Lie'" before the general election and remain in power regardless of election results.0 for 1, still tens of thousands to go.
America Spends $7.8B Monthly On SNAP, Remove ILLEGALS From SNAP The Cost Would Reduce 70%!
in Political Forum
Posted
Reagan can make his own argument and IF they weren’t facts, simply dispute them with the real facts.
There are several things that could depress me, but a sports forum (even being the best one ), ain’t one of them, lol.