LumRaiderFan
-
Posts
16,780 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
80
Posts posted by LumRaiderFan
-
-
7 minutes ago, thetragichippy said:
"wear" it
Why do you have to be accusatory because I disagree with you?
Is your point that weak?
Remember my bee and fly epigram?
It applies here.
- thetragichippy, OlDawg and baddog
-
3
-
3 minutes ago, baddog said:
Our friend Hagar (RIP) would have been very interested. He’d say, “It’s about dad blame time they told us”. Lol
Don’t you know everything is a coverup unless it pertains to Epstein? Lmao
You’re exactly right, he would have been all over this, lol.
He would have been saying “I told y’all”.
-
57 minutes ago, Porter said:
WTH?! Alien Files?! Who was asking for that? ……But but but the Dow is over 50,000!!!
Hey look over there!! Lol
http://when was the uap congressional hearing
This started well before Trump’s second term and there is a tremendous amount of interest. Some of the sightings these military pilots claim to have seen is fascinating.
But I’m sure it’s another piece of a massive coverup.
-
-
7 minutes ago, DCT said:
Talking about a woman using the pseudonym Katie Johnson who alleges in 2016 Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epatein raped her at a party in 1994 when she was 13 years old.
🤦♂️
-
12 minutes ago, DCT said:
Keep telling yourself that. You can care less about what the victims have to say. You are more worried about what is on a t-shirt.
Lol, good one. 🙄
-
1 minute ago, DCT said:
Sounds a lot like this administration. Remember the ICE shooting of the alleged domestic terrorist.
This isn’t about the Epstein mess or the victims for you, it’s 100% get Trump, that’s it.
-
5 minutes ago, baddog said:
Would that be to prevent a lawsuit?
That’s probably part of it, but they also know those news snippets are all that’s required for many to run with it like it’s proven facts, the proof is on this very site.
Folks throw out unproven news articles and expect you to condemn someone based on it and if you don’t, you must approve of the “alleged” behavior.
-
7 minutes ago, thetragichippy said:
Donald Trump Jr. reportedly met Jeffrey Epstein months before financier’s death
No where in the article that reads like The National Inquire by the way, does it state Jr. MET with Epstein. This is typical click bait, and because of you, I clicked it to verify. Your headline is a lie right off the bat.
Also, it was reported on X by Ed Krassenstein.....who is a social influencer....and guess how he gets paid......CLICKS - he post outrageous stuff and gets paid by how many people click on it. He purposely trolls Trump and makes a fortune.Headlines that lead with “reportedly”, “it’s alleged” and “according to an anonymous source” have skyrocketed in the Trump era.
-
Just now, DCT said:
You funny 😆
Nope, just truthful.
-
Just now, DCT said:
Do her job and release the files.
No, what’s your option?
Answer, you have none, you have to wait, just like me.
-
7 minutes ago, DCT said:
Despite the assurance that nothing warranted further investigation, Attorney General Pam Bondi nonetheless announced in November that the Justice Department would investigate Epstein’s relationships with prominent Democrats (https://www.nationalreview.com/2025/11/is-bondi-saying-her-dojs-prior-exhaustive-epstein-review-was-a-sham/) like Bill Clinton. The announcement came after Trump called for such probes. Bill Clinton has repeatedly denied wrongdoing related to Epstein.
Fast forward to last week, when Bondi signaled during testimony to the House Judiciary Committee that more investigations were happening.
You want me to wait on Bondi?What’s your option?
-
-
-
4 minutes ago, HangPDFs said:
So many sympathizers and defenders here 🤢🤢🤢
Nah, just Americans waiting on proof without a doubt before assuming guilt.
I’ve heard about that concept somewhere.
Hmmmmm 🤔
-
Just now, thetragichippy said:
You do remember the Biden administration at four years to file charges….
That was not a political talking point back then, was it?
This is the elephant in the room, the excuse you get is Trump brought it up, which he did. Doesn’t change the fact that there was no interest in this or justice for the victims until now. And you’re a supporter of a pedo president if you don’t drop everything and become consumed with this.
Ridiculous
- baddog and thetragichippy
-
1
-
1
-
1 minute ago, SmashMouth said:
You're missing the point. Crime is an expression of self & free will. Plus crime prevention is racist. Plus did anyone consider the feelings of the "individuals with justice system involvement" (previously known as criminals)? I think we as a society need to take a step back and quit trying to defame those "impacted by the justice system" and consider replacing traditional law enforcement with behavioral health and social workers.
😎
lol, welcome back, nice entrance.
And your satirical point would be policy to many if given a choice.
-
-
1 minute ago, Porter said:
Not saying it does but to think he’s incapable of spanking a little teenage girl is just not being realistic.
Why not wait for proof rather than make an assumption like that?
-
4 minutes ago, Porter said:
I don’t know all the inner workings but I am also not so blind to see that Trump has rubbed elbows with some sick people capable of doing sick things.
Hopefully your Epstein Administration will survive this.
Carry on, I’m sure you’ll figure it out.
-
4 minutes ago, DCT said:
He just not buying what MAGA is selling.
👏
-
6 minutes ago, Porter said:
Thank you, there are also other addresses tied to Prince Andrew they are searching also I guess you already know what they found there also. Lol
I don’t, I’m waiting, and I hope they burn anyone involved in any nefarious activity, but I’m not holding my breath.
Folks at a certain level are never held to account, including Andrew, it’s just a sad reality that won’t consume my time.
-
1 minute ago, Porter said:
Well we will see. They didn’t only arrest him they raided his castle what hours ago and you already know what they found and what he’s been arrested for? I’m impressed!
I’m impressed that you know all the inner workings of the Epstein investigation.
-
9 minutes ago, baddog said:
Libs won’t be happy. Chaos is their business, until it affects them. Then they find someone to blame for their misfortune.
I’m afraid you’re probably right, sad that this wouldn’t be good news for everyone.
SCOTUS Rules Against Trump Administration IEEPA Tariffs
in Political Forum
Posted
This should get interesting, I know the commentary from both sides this morning has been.