LumRaiderFan

Not a peep out of you over the fake Russia collusion investigations and the impeach, impeach, impeach from the democrats over actual false charges. Now that it's coming down on your folks and there have actually been crimes committed, it's time to just move on and let it go. lol

Not at all, looks like finally someone in Washington, who can do something about it, cares.

Right, nobody cares about a sitting VP cutting deals for his crackhead son and getting a cut. 🤦

I actually think biden's worst nightmare is doing a speech without a teleprompter and depends.

[Hidden Content] These folks are worried about free speech for "marginalized" communities. Always follow the money, from the article: Accountable Tech is not a standalone organization. Instead, it's a fiscally sponsored project of the North Fund, a nonprofit incubator closely tied to a billion-dollar dark money network managed by the Arabella Advisors consulting firm, Washington D.C. business records show. The left-wing group is also closely linked to Hillary Clinton's Onward Together nonprofit, which the failed presidential contender created following her 2016 loss to Donald Trump to allow her to be a part of the resistance. In December 2020, Accountable Tech joined Onward Together as an official partner, according to a press release. "It's a tremendous honor to join the Onward Together family, and to have the opportunity to work alongside such a dynamic coalition of leaders in the fight for a more just future," Accountable Tech co-founder Jesse Lehrich said in a statement at the time. I wonder why some posters on here aren't hammering Clinton and her ilk as lunatics for refusing to accept election results...strange.

I love me some gridlock as well, makes it harder for either side to spend our money.

He pulls a lot of stuff out of thin air, lol.

No, it is not.

The left is nominating buffoons and it seems to be working out. And I'm not griping about how dumb and terrible the left is, that's a given, it's the squishy moderates. Too left or too right, lol, come on people, get some sort of moral compass and stick with it. Do these moderates only want SOME babies killed, SOME of the guns confiscated, SOME money for college but not all, do they only want SOME of the coal miners and pipeline workers fired, SOME parts of Obamacare implemented, only SOME of the military equipment left to the Taliban and only SOME of the people left to fend for themselves to get out? It's literally impossible to appease these fickle fools and what's worse, their numbers are too high to defeat them.

Thank you, you're making my point...it is, without a doubt, feelings over policy. No fixing that. By the way, why don't moderates demand more from the democrat candidates? Seems they are only critical of the Republican candidates...strange. Walker and Oz were much better choices than Fetterman and Warnok for someone that truly was unbiased and trying to make the right choice policy wise, especially if they lean to the right a little. But I guess TDS overrides all these days in the squishy moderate world.

So simply put up more "likeable" candidates that are pushing the exact same policies will be a sure fired way of swaying the moderates away from the candidates that push policies that are destroying the country. Just backing policies that are destroying the country isn't enough to sway them away from those folks, I guess. Do you see how completely asinine that way of thinking is and yes, it is 100% feelings over policy. I'm not pretending there is a fix to the problem we have now with this mindset, I'm simply honest enough to acknowledge what the problem is. It's progressively moving that direction, soon they will get the guns and be able to kill full term babies out of the womb and there be those that say, if we would have just put up the right candidate, these folks would have been content and settled down.

I'll try and address this rambling response, but first, answer this, what ground are we not giving way to that we should?

Yeah, you nailed it, I just want to gripe, what a ridiculous take on it. These aren't Republicans that are choosing democrats, it's the squishy moderates. And tell me, what social issues are so important that you would choose them over trashing our energy sector, swing the borders wide open, usher in inflation and high unemployment and higher taxes. Tell me what social issues are so important, is it the freedom to murder babies at will, free college, what are they?

Are you pro choice?

I agree there are others but we may not have a choice, without a doubt any would be better than what the democrats will serve up. The problem we have was stated very well long ago by John Adams. Liberty cannot be preserved without a general knowledge among the people. Pretty sure he wasn't referring to a general knowledge about the Kardashians or who won American Idol.

Exactly right, Republicans go into panic mode trying to find a candidate that will find favor with the democrats and media, ain't happening. McCain was the darling of the left UNTIL he ran for President. Can't appease the left, we need to stop trying.

Folks have been screaming to have someone step in that wasn't part of the swamp...then we got it. It led to energy independence, lower taxes and unemployment, someone at least wanting to solve the border problem, someone that was tired of being taken advantage of in free trade and NATO...the list goes on. What is much more toxic to me than rhetoric is stuff like Bush doubling down on the DEA and Medicare D...that's what is toxic to me...expanding the federal government. Republicans seem to think that getting back to the more civil but same old swamp politics that brought us Trump in the first place is the way to go, all because the idiotic moderates say so. Personally, I would rather go down fighting for what's right instead of kowtowing to the radical baby killing left. Trump may not be the guy but he's better than any of the folks I see in Washington that will simply play by Washington rules.

Mine either, he'll get my vote again if he's the Republican nominee because he'll be way better for the country than anyone on the democrat side. That is a fact, there's no debate over it, and still, uninformed "swing" voters will vote to the detriment of the country based on feelings.

More like the malnourished kid remaining malnourished because they heard the guy trying to give them steak was tweeting mean stuff.

Bunch of wackos, how dare they question election results.

I will, they filled out the ballot for a poor choice, all the while having a record they could have checked. Maybe they are voting for exactly what they want, which makes them even worse.

News flash, the right will not win today's moderate vote. 30 years ago the moderate vote would not be offended by allowing states to decide whether or not women can indiscriminately kill the unborn, they wouldn't want to see open borders, low taxes and low unemployment was important, they wanted fossil fuel and all the jobs it provided and they weren't crying about free college, it's a different moderate vote that is uninformed and can be swayed by shysters and smooth talkers promising crap they'll never deliver. The democrats have been overtaken by the AOC crowd and the country is heading to a bad place but somehow that can be overlooked because some candidates, in your opinion, are simply too mean-spirited and dare to think Trump did a good job (which he did). Unwoke nailed it, it's feelings over policy, mainly because this moderate swing voter you tout has no clue what the policy is, or doesn't care, or both. Might take a while, but it's game over, trust me.

Are you talking about the energy independence, lower taxes, low unemployment, build the wall, 3 conservative SCJ blueprint? Or are you talking about the crass mean tweet blueprint? I know which one carries more weight in the crowd you continuously make excuses for.

Folks keep electing these democrats that want to defund the police, push the green energy policies while destroying our fossil fuel industry, have open borders, the list goes on....basically voting in candidates with voting records that are detrimental to this country. At what point should we place blame on the voter for making bad choices and quit blaming the better candidate? I would like to hear what her radical policies are as well instead of she was simply a Trump disciple.

Arizona’s loss, you’ll see the same crap show next election cycle, democrats sure aren’t going to clean their mess up. It also helps to have a state with plenty of “sensitive” voters. Arizona is gone.