Leaderboard

Can we also find out who shot JFK?

Drop game 3 with a 3-2 score in 10 innings. Left a total of 37 runners on base in the 3 games. Had this same struggle at times last year. Head to Austin Tuesday and then host Kansaas in Wednesday.

Who knows, the FBI and CIA are purposely mucking this up imo.

Throwing out names from random emails is easy.....but did they do anything? Just because they are mentioned does not equate guilt.....but is sure creates clicks for folks that get monetized for activity on social media. We are up to 59 pages here talking about it. Look at Kathryn Ruemmler - She had to resign because she was friends with him - was Obama's white house counsel from 2011 - 2014 - No accusations of any criminal activity.

[Hidden Content] We live in a country where you can get fired for supporting law enforcement. That’s sad.

We live in a time of instant gratification. What once took days to get information now takes seconds. With that said…. This administration has just passed the 1 year mark. Democrats have wisely tied up over 500 DOJ lawyers to redact the Epstein documents. What could 500 attorneys be doing instead of redacting files? Based on what I have seen Trump do, Trump does not back down. I’m still optimistic Trump has the right people in place to go after criminals. It takes time to put together a case against someone, and rushing could screw up the case. He is also dealing with “never Trumpers” buried deep in the DOJ and FBI. So with all that, I’m cautiously optimistic.

If I need a birth certificate to vote, then I won't be able to. My last name on my birth certificate does not match my current last name, because I am married. What is the solution do this problem?

This is narrative warfare. It is designed to delay justice, dilute responsibility, and shield powerful offenders by burying the truth in fog and bureaucracy. If there were any integrity in this process, the full files would already be public—clearly, completely, and honestly without redactions. Show who did what. Show who knew. Show who covered it up. Stop hiding behind redactions and half-truths. @realDonaldTrump must correct this—ASAP. The American people deserve real transparency, real accountability, and real consequences. We are sick and tired of an inefficient DOJ. Over 72 million Americans voted for ACCOUNTABILITY, and we will not be ignored. To all the elite pedos and traitors who despised me for being an honest person who could not be turned into one of their demons—YOU WILL NOT WIN. The truth is coming, and justice will not be denied. General Mike Flynn No doubt IMO

Now, let him rush to explain his name in the files like he thought it was so unimportant for others just to be listed. Let him be on the other end of ‘gotcha.’ He and Khanna were still in grade school when Epstein was already involved. Epstein’s name was known way back in the day. He bought SAT for goodness sake. Rush in based on emotion at your own peril, and I STILL haven’t heard of any evidence DOJ can use to actually prosecute anyone. This will end—as I’ve said—with a very low whimper, people will get a glimpse into how questionable some of the ‘so-called elites’ behavior is if they didn’t already know, and the public won’t be satisfied.

Real talk: If the Epstein hysteria was to evaporate tomorrow never to be heard about again, by far the biggest losses will be the revenue now being realized by all the online influencers who are relying on it for income.

Johnson's stats from Friday night: (missed triple double by 2 assists) 23 Points 10 Reb 8 ast Johnson scored or assisted on 42 of Silsbee's 57 points.

Crazy to think BISD could have 2 state champs in 5A…

First, by Texas law if you are committing a crime act, you generally don’t get self defense. As an example… A guy goes in to rob a store with a gun. He has no intention of using it but as he makes his demand for the money and then grabs it and runs. The clerk pulls his own gun as the robber tries to get away and is running out of the store. The clerk shots the robber who is clearly trying to get away. The robber turns and shoots at the store clerk in “self defense” because the store clerk is shooting at him while he is just trying to get away. The store clerk dies. Self defense? No, it’s Capital Murder and death penalty eligible. The robber trying to flee was still in the act of committing a robbery by trying to escape with the money and the store clerk acted lawfully, whereas the robber did not. There is no self-defense in such a case. In this situation the accused went into a felony drug deal and brought a firearm. Was he an innocent and unwilling bystander or a person willingly participating in a felony (for which he was convicted) where he brought a gun anticipating possible violence? So even if he was defending himself, is it “clearly self defense” while participating in a potential violent felony? Let’s look at the actual law on self defense. Here is the quoted applicable Texas Penal Code law on if self defense is lawful while committing a crime. A person person is justified in using self defense IF; (C) was committing or attempting to commit aggravated kidnapping, murder, sexual assault, aggravated sexual assault, robbery, or aggravated robbery; (2) did not provoke the person against whom the force was used; AND (3) was not otherwise engaged in criminal activity, other than a Class C misdemeanor that is a violation of a law or ordinance regulating traffic at the time the force was used. Notice that it says “was not otherwise engaged in criminal activity, other than a Class C misdemeanor that is a violation of a law or ordinance regulating traffic at the time the force was used”. He was most definitely engaged in criminal activity other that a traffic citation. Obviously the DA didn’t think it was clearly self defense. Read the quote from the law and tell me if self defense is available in Texas while voluntarily committing a felony. With that being the law, I said that the it would be a tough case possibly by the defense attorney doing his/her job of trying to convince the jury to not go by the law that I posted. Oh well, the other guy was a bad guy so let my client go. It worked. That is the system. Notice that the same jury who was almost certainly given the law that I posted above and apparently found that he was “not engaged in a criminal activity” (other than a traffic citation), found that he was engaged in 4 felonies and gave him the maximum sentence. The accused is guaranteed the right to a public trial and a unanimous decision of proof beyond a reasonable doubt before conviction. A jury can be 90% sure that the crime was committed yet that is reasonable doubt. That doesn’t mean innocent. It means the jury didn’t feel that the DA proved the case. That again is the system. So again, read the law that I quoted on self defense. It can be lawful IF stopping certain crimes against the person AND was not committing another crime… which the jury coincidentally found him guilty of 4 felonies. I have no clue what was testified to in court, but I can reasonably believe that DA was looking at the same law that I posted. The jury said that he is not guilty so by law he is not guilty, hard stop. Clearly self defense??