All Activity

Yes, I would, but not for the reasons you think. The more conservative the commentary on tariffs, the louder the protest against them has been. Allowing such an egregious violation of executive powers would have confirmed them as a kangaroo court. I can handle conservatives, lapdogs I cannot.

If Warren gets a good coach, they should be able to beat Newton. As you indicated multiple times, winning has little to do with talent and primarily comes down to coaching. Speed, coordination and strength meaning very little. I was recently at an event and noticed how the Warren kids looked exactly like the Newton kids and that there is no reason for Warren to not compete with Newton. Still cant figure out why college coaches only recruit athletically dominant players? Seems like they could win with any group of players with good coaching.

This X infinity. POTUS will either have to work with Congress (doubtful—especially with early primaries going already), or find another way. Bad thing is, people will expect prices to come down and they won’t.

Franklin 8 New Waverly 3 final/5.... game called bottom 5 Franklin had 2 on no outs when game called. New Waverly will make some noise this year in their district.

As your buddy JoeBama would say, “Come on Man”! You’d be hollering if it went the other way!

No just one basketball player and he's doing both when he can

What is your deal? This isn’t junior high. This is a victory for the Constitution and affirmation that the court will interpret it collectively. I may not agree with all their interpretations, but this is strong evidence that they will not serve as lapdogs to the Executive branch.

Well, this is true. That’s why you keep trying. A school district either cares or they don’t. Unfortunately maybe Warren is in the don’t care category.

No doubt, if it went the other way they would be screaming to stack the court.

I’m guessing refunds will require another lawsuit.

Yes, and I agree. But since the ruling is against Trump, they will love this conservative SC.

The Constitution just entered the chat.

Everyone should, it confirms our separation of powers. 🙂

Now the libs will love this SC.

If nothing changes, then nothing gonna change.

This should get interesting, I know the commentary from both sides this morning has been.

They didn't mention anything about having to return collected funds. Curious about that issue. FYI... The link is a live update link. So, you can continue to check it for reactions if desired.

Let’s see how he reacts to being told no. With the grace befitting the office, I hope.

Who says they gonna get a good coach? They haven’t had a very good history of it. That’s why you keep trying to find one.

Remember my bee and fly epigram? It applies here.

The Supreme Court justices, in a 6-3 ruling, upheld a lower court's decision that the Republican president's use of this 1977 law exceeded his authority. [Hidden Content]

[Hidden Content]

"wear" it Why do you have to be accusatory because I disagree with you? Is your point that weak?

Learn to spell.