All Activity

Final Hemphill 45 San Augustine 75

Final 81-43 Orangefield

👀 🍿

Update?

Halftime Pineywoods CA 10 Central Heights 28

Paid for by the Ohio Demoncratic party! LOL!

End 1st Pineywoods CA 4 Central Heights 15

The intent of seizing drug money is use it in law enforcement including community youth support programs. The money does have to be turned in to the government (state/federal) but it mostly (or all depending on the state) has to go back to law enforcement. So a city chief as an example, cannot put it in his pocket. Like all funding it has to go through the city council but earmarked for the police. Much or all of it goes to the federal government who divides it up between the police agencies involved in the seizure.

Burkeville 50 Leggett 46 Final

Maybe not, still not gonna waste my time guessing.

This administration is not interested in guilt.

I’m not circling any wagon, I’m simply waiting for proof of guilt, rather than sit around spitballing.

[Hidden Content]

Most enjoyable thing for my father and me is attending a college ball game! Enjoy the season to all the baseball fans. You know we get to do today, Brooks? We get to play baseball!

All I get from all this hogwash is, no matter what happens, democrats are never happy. Who’s watching the videos? Isn’t that pedophilia in and of itself? Sad, someone has to do it.

I'm not the only one apparently. You are circling the wrong wagon.

I do not, but I’m not the one automatically jumping to anti Trump conclusions.

Do you really know? Let's say she was trying to protect the victims. Who on that panel would expose the victims?

How do you know that?

What I keep saying is, there’s a big difference in someone being named, someone even documented as being there, and being able to prove a criminal case without a doubt when it would probably revert to a circumstantial he said/she said against folks who have the ability to hire the best lawyers on the planet—if you could even get them to trial. There’s no way you’re getting the foreign actors here to stand trial. That’s why I keep saying shame and ostracism are probably what we’ll get.

Really? All we know is what is being released. They(congress) are trying to interpret redacted emails, accusations from anonymous sources, etc…… a single do or don’t can change the meaning of a redacted document 100%. Allegations have plagued Trumps terms by Democrats….Russigate….

If she was truly going after those involved there would be no allegations of a cover up.

It’s entirely probable that’s why they’re logging. But, the reason doesn’t really matter. ALL SCIF activity is tracked and logged. That’s the nature of a SCIF. As the Head of the Dept. owning the information, she would have access.

What if she was using it to collect evidence on Congress people that may be involved with the Epstein case? Would you be for or against that?

The DOJ claims it logs searches to protect against the release of victim information within the sensitive, unreacted files. Was Bondi utilizing it it that manner? Probably not.