Jump to content

Scores for Tues, Feb. 2 - UPDATED

HoopInsider_Cooper
 Share

Recommended Posts

HoopInsider_Cooper

HoopInsider_Cooper

Posted
Posted
[font=Courier][b]Straight Up:[/b] 179-36 (.832)
[b]Spread:[/b] 138-77 (.641)

[size=12pt][u][b]Tues, Feb. 2[/b][/u][/size]
[size=12pt][b][i]21-5A[/i][/b][/size]
[b]West Brook 67[/b], @ Channelview 58
WB (17-8, 4-2)
CV (2-4)
PICK: WB (-4)

[b]PA Memorial 70[/b], @ North Shore 64
PAM (21-3, 6-0)
NS (4-2)
PICK: [color=green]PAM (-6)[/color]

[b]@ Lee 67[/b], Sterling 65
S (1-5), L (1-5)

[size=12pt][i][b]20-4A[/b][/i][/size]
[b]@ Ozen 67[/b], Vidor 39
V (13-18, 1-9)
O (16-8, 9-1)
PICK: Ozen (-25)

[b]Central 69[/b], @ Lumberton 63
C (11-14, 7-3)
L (11-20, 1-9)
PICK: Cen [color=red](-16)[/color]

[b]@ LC-M 63[/b], Nederland 51
L (17-13, 5-5)
N (14-14, 7-3)
PICK: [color=red]Ned (-5)[/color]

[b]Livingston 50[/b], @ PN-G 49
L (12-15, 6-4)
P (16-10, 4-6)
PICK: [color=red]PN-G (-3)[/color]

[size=12pt][b][i]19-4A[/i][/b][/size]
[b]Kingwood Park 52[/b], @ Barbers Hill 33
BH (19-20, 4-6)
KP (9-1)
PICK: KP (-4)

[b]@ Crosby 58[/b], GC Memorial 47
C (11-17, 3-7)
GCM (4-6)
PICK: Crosby (-1)

[b]North Forest 69[/b], @ Dayton 65
NF (2-8)
D (5-17, 1-9)
PICK: NF (-2)

[b]CE King 77[/b], @ Galena Park 54
CEK (9-1), GP (8-2)

[b][i][size=12pt]18-3A[/size][/i][/b]
[b]Huntington 45[/b], @ Jasper 41
H (5-5)
J (12-13, 5-5)
PICK: Hunt (-3)

[b]Center 64[/b], @ Rusk 58 OT
C (10-0), R (5-5)

[b]Lufkin Hudson 64[/b], @ Pollok Central 28
LH (9-1), PC (0-10)

[b]@ Diboll 63[/b], Carthage 50
C (3-7)
D (3-7)

[b][i][size=12pt]21-3A[/size][/i][/b]
[b]Hardin-Jefferson 74[/b], @ Bridge City 45
HJ (28-3, 5-1)
BC (12-16, 2-4)
PICK: H-J (-22)

[b]@ Orangefield 64[/b], Hamshire-Fannett 47
HF (6-19, 0-6)
O (15-14, 2-4)
PICK: OF (-14)

[b]@ Silsbee 58[/b], WO-S 44
W (17-9, 3-2)
S (23-2, 6-0)
PICK: Sils [color=red](-19)[/color]

[b][i][size=12pt]22-2A[/size][/i][/b]
[b]@ Woodville 63[/b], Kirbyville 50
K (11-7, 3-3)
W (18-6, 6-0)
PICK: Wood [color=red](-16)[/color]

[b]Newton 60[/b], @ Hemphill 53
N (6-13, 4-2)
H (1-5)
PICK: Newton [color=red](-17)[/color]

Shelbyville (0-5) @ San Augustine (3-2)

[b][i][size=12pt]24-2A[/size][/i][/b]
[b]@ Kountze 92[/b], Anahuac 70
A (11-14, 5-3)
K (27-2, 9-0)
PICK: Ktz [color=red](-30)[/color]

[b]@ Buna 58[/b], Deweyville 56
D (11-13, 3-6)
B (10-9, 3-5)
PICK: [color=green]Buna (-2)[/color]

Warren (5-16, 0-8) @ Hardin (11-12, 3-5)
PICK: Hardin (-20)

[size=12pt][b][i]23-A[/i][/b][/size]
[b]Latexo 58[/b], @ Big Sandy 47
L (2-4)
BS (12-14, 1-5)
PICK: BS (-5)

[b]Lovelady[/b] def. Alto - no score reported
A (1-4), L (5-1)

[b][i][size=12pt]25-A[/size][/i][/b]
[b]@ Evadale 77[/b], West Hardin 47
WH (7-10, 2-5)
E (16-8, 5-1)
PICK: Eva (-28)

[b]@ High Island 52[/b], Hull-Daisetta 51
HI (5-11, 2-5)
HD (4-13, 1-5)
PICK: HI [color=red](-2)[/color]

[b]@ Sabine Pass 58[/b], Spurger 47
Spur (19-5, 5-1)
SP (11-8, 4-2)
PICK: [color=red]Spur (-7)[/color]

[b][i][size=12pt]TAPPS[/size][/i][/b]
[b]@ St. Pius 73[/b], Kelly 38
K (8-16, 2-4): 3rd Place
STP (3-3): 2nd Place
PICK: STP (-9)

[b]@ Legacy Christian 75[/b], Brazosport Christian 36
LC (10-19, 10-0): District champs
PICK: LC [color=red](-45)[/color]

[b]@ Family Christian 67[/b], Community Christian 63
CC (19-5, 11-2): 3rd Place
[/font]
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Alpha Wolf

Alpha Wolf

Posted
Posted
Legacy played the likes of Silsbee, WO-S, H.J., East Chambers, Bridge City, Vidor, Sabine Pass, Jasper, PN-G, Orangefield and Koutze just to name a few.  A lot of schools around here would not put those schools on there schedule.  They have one if not the smallest enrollment in the area.  They choose to stay away from just playing private and 1A and 2A schools in non-district.  If they did that they would probably get some wins but using the approach they do makes them ready for district.  If they go 19-0 prior to district but can't compete in district, what benefit does that have?  So yes they went through district 10-0.  Thats the district they are assigned to based on enrollment numbers and location.  So how did your school do in district this year?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,977
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Reagan
      America lost. The Kangaroo Court won.

      By Reagan · Posted

      BOOM!!
    • Mr. Buddy Garrity
      Road to Omaha

      By Mr. Buddy Garrity · Posted

      We'll see. I don't trust us. 
    • PhatMack19
      Road to Omaha

      By PhatMack19 · Posted

      Starting pitching has been shaky the last few weeks due to some injuries outside of Hagen Smith.  He goes tomorrow, so y’all should be fine 
    • tvc184
      West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin leaves Democratic Party, registers as independent

      By tvc184 · Posted

      Manchin may get it but any mention of the radical left that wanted to get rid of the filibuster and end almost 220 years of history because the Democrats are mad?  The House and Senate are obviously different legislative bodies with entirely different election processes and rules for a reason. The House can vote on laws with a simple majority vote. The Senate put rules in place that it would make it much tougher to pass laws. Laws should be difficult to pass. The Senate is often the holdup of the right and left. It takes 60 votes to break the filibuster so any law will almost certainly require agreement at least in part, from opposing sides of an issue. Because they can’t get laws passed, the radical left is like a baby having a tantrum and wants to change over 200 years of history and make it potentially ridiculously easy to pass laws. I have seen current poll maps and it is possible for the Republicans to sweep into complete power in November but by the tiniest margin. That would possibly mean that a single vote margin in both houses could enact what you might call the radical right laws. There would be nothing that the Democrats could do to stop any legislation whatsoever if the left (they are all radical, minus Manchin) got their filibuster rule changed.  That is where the current filibuster comes into play as any new law would require several Democrats to agree with the majority Republicans and vice versa.  Do you want the potential for your radical right to have free rein as the radical left wants by killing the filibuster or is the radical left just as (if not more) dangerous? Let’s see if we have a history in this area? Oh yeah, the Democrats changed the rules in the Senate to allow federal judges to not have to overcome the filibuster. Obama was not getting his federal judge nominations passed and being angry, they changed the rules instead of nominating more moderate justices. They were warned that it would come back to bite them. They didn’t care and chose the nuclear option to change the rules. Oops! Any guess how Trump got all of his Supreme Court nominees passed against strong Democrat opposition? The Democrats got rid of the filibuster for federal judges after another tantrum   So when you are so worried about the radical right, are you equally concerned in what the radical left is always doing by changing rules and history which were put into place just for situations like we are in? So while Manchin gets it, what about his other 50 colleagues (49 + Harris)?  What concerns you more, Abbott and Paxton or the Democrats who want to make it to where if the Republicans do take over, they can go wild… at least in your mind? 
    • Separation Scientist
      Bridgeland vs Tomball

      By Separation Scientist · Posted

      MODS please remove that ISD twitter link! I had no idea it would copy the whole posting. I only highlighted the portion about the venue change. Sorry about that!

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...