Jump to content

Kville's pregame meal. Thank you Frank!

Kville1968

By Kville1968
in SETXsports Archived Threads

 Share

Recommended Posts

Kville1968

Kville1968

Posted
Posted
A lot of athletes have pregame traditions or rituals that they do not break. I just heard that someone is flying the 'Cats in their traditional meal by private plane. How about that for curb service! Anyone from this area knows where its coming from.  Does it make a difference? It does not matter what I think if it makes the boys feel ready more power to 'em.

Thank you to Frank George for all that he does for the team and for the community.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest ~old_wildcat~

Guest ~old_wildcat~

Posted
Posted
[quote name="speedkills" post="727896" timestamp="1260504996"]
Thanks Frank you do help out the team and community a lot
[/quote]

  Thanks frank for all you do,for the Schools and the town of Kirbyville and your avid support of the Wildcat's...We do appreciate you...

                                                      "GO WILDCAT'S"
Link to comment
Share on other sites
grizzly62

grizzly62

Posted
Posted
[quote name="SETEXFan" post="727981" timestamp="1260534697"]
Someone might want to chek out Katy and their team meal a few yeras back and the UIL ruling that took them from a state championship game.  Keep everything on the up and up with the UIL and go win you a state championship!!!
[/quote]

What happend????
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest GCMPats

Guest GCMPats

Posted
Posted
Here's a link to the Katy fiasco.

http://airwolf.lmtonline.com/sports/archive/102898/pageb1.pdf


If it is over $5 and the athletes are not paying for this meal, it is my understanding that they are in violation of the UIL.

Section 441: VALUABLE CONSIDERATION SCHOOL TEAMS AND ATHLETES MAY ACCEPT:

1. Pre-season. School athletic teams may be given no more than one pre-season meal, per sport, per school year such as a fish fry, ice cream supper, etc. provided it is approved by the school and given by a nonprofit organization, usually the booster club, before the team plays in its first contest. It may be given after a scrimmage.

[b]2. Post-season. School athletic teams are limited to no more than one post-season meal or banquet per sport, per school year, and it must be given by a nonprofit organization and approved by the school. Banquet favors or gifts are considered valuable consideration and are a violation if they are given to a student athlete at any time.[/b]

3. Other. School athletic teams and athletes may be invited to and may attend functions where free admission is offered or where refreshments and/or meals are served, provided all students from that high school are invited to attend for the same fee and on the same basis as the athletes or the athletic team. Athletes or athletic teams may be recognized at these functions but may not accept anything that is not given to all other students.
VALUABLE CONSIDERATION THAT SCHOOL TEAMS
Link to comment
Share on other sites
JFC

JFC

Posted
Posted
Just as I have posted on the other thread about this topic: This meal is being billed and paid for by the district just as every other meal that we have served them. It is not about the superstitions or rituals of the team, it is about motivation, and showing our boys that we are behind them. 

BTW- looks like the weather is not going to cooperate for flying so we are going to plan B  "The Ground Game"
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest GCMPats

Guest GCMPats

Posted
Posted
[quote name="biggen" post="728065" timestamp="1260545959"]
Pretty sure that's illegal, you might not want to post that  ???
[/quote]

Nope. Not illegal. Athletic departments can provide meals for thier athletes. Boosters can not. How it gets delivered is not revelant.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,977
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Reagan
      America lost. The Kangaroo Court won.

      By Reagan · Posted

      BOOM!!
    • Mr. Buddy Garrity
      Road to Omaha

      By Mr. Buddy Garrity · Posted

      We'll see. I don't trust us. 
    • PhatMack19
      Road to Omaha

      By PhatMack19 · Posted

      Starting pitching has been shaky the last few weeks due to some injuries outside of Hagen Smith.  He goes tomorrow, so y’all should be fine 
    • tvc184
      West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin leaves Democratic Party, registers as independent

      By tvc184 · Posted

      Manchin may get it but any mention of the radical left that wanted to get rid of the filibuster and end almost 220 years of history because the Democrats are mad?  The House and Senate are obviously different legislative bodies with entirely different election processes and rules for a reason. The House can vote on laws with a simple majority vote. The Senate put rules in place that it would make it much tougher to pass laws. Laws should be difficult to pass. The Senate is often the holdup of the right and left. It takes 60 votes to break the filibuster so any law will almost certainly require agreement at least in part, from opposing sides of an issue. Because they can’t get laws passed, the radical left is like a baby having a tantrum and wants to change over 200 years of history and make it potentially ridiculously easy to pass laws. I have seen current poll maps and it is possible for the Republicans to sweep into complete power in November but by the tiniest margin. That would possibly mean that a single vote margin in both houses could enact what you might call the radical right laws. There would be nothing that the Democrats could do to stop any legislation whatsoever if the left (they are all radical, minus Manchin) got their filibuster rule changed.  That is where the current filibuster comes into play as any new law would require several Democrats to agree with the majority Republicans and vice versa.  Do you want the potential for your radical right to have free rein as the radical left wants by killing the filibuster or is the radical left just as (if not more) dangerous? Let’s see if we have a history in this area? Oh yeah, the Democrats changed the rules in the Senate to allow federal judges to not have to overcome the filibuster. Obama was not getting his federal judge nominations passed and being angry, they changed the rules instead of nominating more moderate justices. They were warned that it would come back to bite them. They didn’t care and chose the nuclear option to change the rules. Oops! Any guess how Trump got all of his Supreme Court nominees passed against strong Democrat opposition? The Democrats got rid of the filibuster for federal judges after another tantrum   So when you are so worried about the radical right, are you equally concerned in what the radical left is always doing by changing rules and history which were put into place just for situations like we are in? So while Manchin gets it, what about his other 50 colleagues (49 + Harris)?  What concerns you more, Abbott and Paxton or the Democrats who want to make it to where if the Republicans do take over, they can go wild… at least in your mind? 
    • Separation Scientist
      Bridgeland vs Tomball

      By Separation Scientist · Posted

      MODS please remove that ISD twitter link! I had no idea it would copy the whole posting. I only highlighted the portion about the venue change. Sorry about that!

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...